Supreme Court rules for Texas death row inmate over IQ claim

WASHINGTON, March 28 (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday ruled in favor of a death row inmate convicted of a 1980 Houston murder, finding that Texas used an obsolete standard to assess whether a defendant has an intellectual disability that would preclude execution.

The justices ruled 5-3 that a Texas court should reconsider whether Bobby Moore, 57, convicted at age 20 of fatally shooting an elderly grocery store clerk during a robbery, is intellectually disabled and thus not eligible for the death penalty.

The Supreme Court ruled in 2002 that the execution of people who are intellectually disabled violates the U.S. Constitution's ban on cruel and unusual punishment. In Moore's case, in a ruling authored by liberal Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, the court held that the state's system for assessing the intellect of defendants is deficient.

RELATED: States with the death penalty

33 PHOTOS
States with the death penalty
See Gallery
States with the death penalty

Alabama

(Photo via Alamy)

Arizona

(Photo by Jaap Hart via Getty Images)

Arkansas

(Photo by Wesley Hitt via Getty Images)

California

(Photo via Alamy)

Colorado

(Photo by David Parsons via Getty Images)

Florida

(Photo via Getty Images)

Georgia

(Photo by Sean Pavone via Getty Images)

Idaho

(Photo via Alamy)

Indiana

(Photo via Getty Images)

Kansas

(Photo by Danita Delimont via Getty Images)

Kentucky

(Photo by Henryk Sadura via Getty Images)

Louisiana

(Photo via Alamy)

Missouri

(Photo via Shutterstock)

Montana

(Photo via Getty Images)

Nebraska

(Photo via Getty Images)

Nevada

(Photo via Getty Images)

New Hampshire

(Photo Getty Images)

North Carolina

(Photo via Getty Images)

Ohio

(Photo via Shutterstock)

Oklahoma

(Photo via Shutterstock)

Oregon

(Photo via Alamy)

Pennsylvania

(Photo via Shutterstock)

South Carolina

(Photo via Getty Images)

South Dakota

(Photo by Dave and Les Jacobs via Getty Images)

Tennessee

(Photo via Getty Images)

Texas

(Photo by Dan Huntley via Getty Images)

Utah

(Photo via Getty Images)

Virginia

(Photo via Getty Images)

Washington

(Photo by Sankar Raman via Getty Images)

Wyoming

(Photo via Getty Images)

U.S. Federal Government

(Photo via Getty Images)

U.S. Military

(Photo by Carl Johnson via Getty Images)

HIDE CAPTION
SHOW CAPTION
of
SEE ALL
BACK TO SLIDE

The lower court that upheld Moore's sentence wrongly used a 24-year-old definition employed in Texas when it determined Moore was not intellectually disabled, violating the prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment, the court ruled.

Ginsburg noted that the Supreme Court had previously said that consideration of intellectual disability must be based on medical expertise.

"That instruction cannot sensibly be read to give courts leave to diminish the force of the medical community's consensus," Ginsburg said.

SEE ALSO: Texas executes man for crime spree that left four dead, including infant

Three of the court's conservatives, Chief Justice John Roberts, Justice Clarence Thomas and Justice Samuel Alito, dissented. Conservative Justice Anthony Kennedy joined the court's four liberals in the ruling.

Moore's appeal focused on how judges should weigh medical evidence of intellectual disability. His lawyers said that a lower court found that Moore's IQ of 70 was "within the range of mild mental retardation."

Moore, a repeat offender at the time of the murder, shot store clerk James McCarble in the head with a shotgun after entering the Birdsall Super Market with two other robbers wearing a wig and sunglasses, according to prosecutors. Authorities apprehended him in Louisiana 10 days later.

Read Full Story

Sign up for Breaking News by AOL to get the latest breaking news alerts and updates delivered straight to your inbox.

Subscribe to our other newsletters

Emails may offer personalized content or ads. Learn more. You may unsubscribe any time.