Uber agrees to settle safety lawsuits for $28.5 million

Updated
Uber Class-Action Lawsuit: What's at Stake
Uber Class-Action Lawsuit: What's at Stake

SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) -- Uber has agreed to pay $28.5 million to settle litigation brought by customers who alleged the ride hailing service misrepresented the quality of its safety practices and the fees it charged passengers, the company said on Thursday.

SEE ALSO: The Oregon militia standoff is finally over

two proposed class action lawsuits said Uber charged passengers a "Safe Rides Fee" of as much as $2.30 per trip to support its "industry leading background check process." However, Uber does not use fingerprint identification which is required by taxi regulators, court filings said.

The cases, filed in a Northern California federal court, were brought after district attorneys in Los Angeles and San Francisco made similar allegations in separate 2014 litigation. Uber's request to dismiss most of the prosecutors' civil lawsuit is scheduled for a hearing on Thursday in San Francisco state court.

How much Uber drivers make in different states:

Uber says the prosecutors are improperly seeking "tens of millions of dollars" in penalties and restitution.

The cases are part of a range of legal and regulatory issues facing Uber. A lawsuit filed by Uber drivers seeking to be classified as employees and entitled to benefits is scheduled for trial in June.

As part of the $28.5 million rider settlement, Uber also agreed to rename the "Safe Ride Fee" a "Booking Fee." Around 25 million riders could qualify to participate in the settlement, Uber said. A San Francisco federal judge will have to approve the deal.

Uber said technology helps safety efforts but no means of transportation is 100 percent safe.

"Accidents and incidents will happen," the company said in a statement. "That's why it's important to ensure that the language we use to describe safety at Uber is clear, precise and accurate."

The consolidated class action lawsuit in U.S. District Court, Northern District of California is Matthew Philliben et al vs. Uber Technologies Inc and Rasier LLC, 14-5615.

More from AOL.com:
Whole Foods CEO predicts an explosive change in how Americans eat
Twitter has rolled out the product change everyone was freaking out about -- and it's no big deal
Macy's is adopting a strategy from more than 100 years ago to save its business

Advertisement