New Stonehenge theory redefines site as 'mecca on stilts'

Updated
New Stonehenge Theory Redefines Site As A 'Mecca On Stilts'
New Stonehenge Theory Redefines Site As A 'Mecca On Stilts'



The theories surrounding Stonehenge are many, but according to one noted curator and critic, for the most part they have one significant flaw -– they're not looking up.

Says Julian Spalding, "The current theories about Stonehenge are based on looking across the ground, which is a modern, materialistic standpoint, not up to heaven, which was our ancient, mind-elevated perception."

It's his belief that the stone pieces that are typically regarded as being the main feature of the site served as nothing more than supports for a raised area of worship.

That wooden platform would have served as both an altar and a beacon for pilgrims traveling to it for worship purposes, operating much like a 'mecca on stilts.'



Spalding points out that at the time Stonehenge was built ground-level worship would have been considered an insult to the divine, as it would have required that they lower themselves to the level of humans.

His theory, however, is a tough one to prove as it involves the existence of several wooden structures, which, unlike their stone counterparts, do not appear to have survived the last 4-and-a-half or so millennia.

More on AOL:
Chicago's tallest building Willis Tower sells for $1.3 billion
Rare albino kangaroos call Australian race track home
Meteorologist explains what a 'fogbow' is

Advertisement