Power-hungry Idaho lawmakers launch another attack on the people’s initiative rights | Opinion

Right now, Idahoans who want to go outside the legislature to change policy have to get signatures from 6% of registered voters in the state, along with 6% in at least 18 of 35 legislative districts. It’s a massive hurdle that only a few have cleared in recent years.

A constitutional amendment proposed by Rep. Doug Okuniewicz on Jan. 25 would make the hurdle practically impossible to clear. Okuniewicz has proposed to turn a law that was ruled unconstitutional by the Idaho Supreme Court in 2021 into a constitutional amendment.

In other words, if the Supreme Court rules something is unconstitutional, the obvious answer is to change the constitution. So thinks the Idaho Legislature, no doubt emboldened by voters’ recent decision to allow it to call itself back into session.

The Idaho Legislature has pushed against the ability of cities, counties and the governor to check its power. Add to the list the judiciary and voters.

The amendment would require that 6% of registered voters in each and every legislative district, rather than just 18 of 35, sign a petition to get a citizens’ initiative on the ballot. It would effectively eliminate the right.

“Rather than evenly distributing power across the state, the Legislature has achieved just the opposite. By requiring a threshold of support from every legislative district in the state, the Legislature has essentially given every legislative district veto power over qualifying initiatives and referenda for the ballot,” wrote Justice Greg Moeller in his memorable opinion striking down the law.

The proposed changes do not protect rural interests, as proponents will no doubt claim. They would silence rural areas forever. Any policy that a rural area wanted to propose could be vetoed by any one of five legislative districts in Boise, or by either of the two districts in Nampa, or by Coeur d’Alene, Idaho Falls, Caldwell or Twin Falls. Any one of these neighborhoods or cities could completely block any rural initiative from the ballot.

In fact, the only way to ensure rural representation is to do the precise opposite of what lawmakers have proposed. If lawmakers reduced the number of districts in which signatures were required, then rural areas could more easily propose initiatives without support from cities. If it took only 10 legislative districts, for example, then south-central and eastern Idaho could band together to propose an initiative. So could the panhandle and central Idaho.

And no matter who proposes the initiative, everyone in the state gets a vote. No initiative can pass without significant support from rural areas in a rural state like Idaho — as happened with Medicaid expansion, which was broadly supported by rural areas and which has helped keep rural hospitals from facing closure.

And there is no evidence that Idaho is being swamped by ballot initiatives. No initiative has appeared on the ballot since 2018. That’s evidence the hurdle is already too high because the Legislature has refused to follow the will of the people.

For example, polling indicates that about two-thirds of Idaho voters support the legalization of medical cannabis, but an initiative along those lines has repeatedly failed to gather enough signatures to make the ballot. It’s simply a massive undertaking.

Lawmakers have remained unwilling to budge on the issue, so people who use marijuana to combat nausea from chemotherapy continue to face possible jail sentences, despite the fact that almost no one thinks they should.

The amendment proposed by Okuniewicz is asking for more power to remain insentient to the will of the people. It is a proposal for the Legislature to cast off checks on its authority, to become more narrow and imperious.

This is nothing new. Without the initiative, Idaho would not have campaign finance disclosure or lobbyist registration laws. The Sunshine Laws were passed by voter initiative, and the Legislature has only moved to narrow them since.

Because the Legislature works to enlarge its own governmental power, and it opposes all measures to rein it in. That’s just the nature of the beast. Voters shouldn’t play into their hands.

Statesman editorials are the unsigned opinion of the Idaho Statesman’s editorial board. Board members are opinion editor Scott McIntosh, opinion writer Bryan Clark, editor Chadd Cripe, newsroom editors Dana Oland and Jim Keyser and community members Johanna Jones and Maryanne Jordan.