The rich get richer, and the rest of us muddle along.
A new report on executive compensation shows the financial crisis has actually been very good to many of the people occupying those cushy corner offices.
While many of us benefit from the recent rally in stocks, those execs often get paid partly in company stock, and they are making out like bandits. And there's nothing shady or nefarious about it.
Here's what's happening: in the wake of the financial crisis, many companies decided to link executive compensation to the performance of the company's bottom line or its stock. Those decisions were made after stock prices had collapsed. So the stock options that were awarded are now worth a small fortune -- or in some cases, a not so small fortune.
An annual report from Equilar found that companies with the highest pay figures last year granted large stock options back in 2010, when the market was low. The compensation research firm says the value of those awards is now much higher than the companies had anticipated.
For example, McKesson's (MCK) CEO was the highest paid in the survey, with what Equilar terms "realizable pay" of more than $150 million dollars in the last fiscal year. That's double what the company had targeted for him.
Ralph Lauren earned $109 million. In all, there were 20 execs that made more than $31 million.
But the average worker is not feeling so excited by his or her pay: CNNMoney reports people in seven of the 10 occupations with the most workers earn less than $30,000 a year.
There are about 4.3 million people working in retail sales. Their average pay last year: $25,300. Food preparation workers, the third most common job, were paid less than $19,000.
Of the 10 most common jobs on a government list, only nurses took home significantly more – an average of nearly $68,000 last year.
CEOs to Fire in 2013
Midday Report: Executives Paid in Stock Rake It In as Workers Struggle
Company: Chesapeake Energy (CHK) Stock Price Change in 2012: -25%
It is nearly impossible to understand how Chesapeake CEO and co-founder Aubrey McClendon has kept his job. In April, an investigation found that he had borrowed $1.1 billion against personal interests he had in oil and gas wells held by his firm. Most analysts viewed this as a serious conflict of interest. The Securities and Exchange Commission started an "informal inquiry" into the matter shortly thereafter. In May, his board forced him out as chairman, and in June, McClendon hired an ex-SEC lawyer to represent his interests.
As if all this wasn't enough to trigger his dismissal from the CEO post, revenue in the most recently reported quarter dropped to $3 billion from $4 billion in the same period a year ago. Even more telling, Chesapeake suffered a loss of $2 billion, compared to a $922 million profit a year earlier.
The board of this oil and natural gas giant was shaken up in June with the arrival of a new chairman and four new members. Odds are, McClendon has run out of time.
Company: Groupon (GRPN) Share Price Change in 2012: -76%
Groupon's falling share price and weak operating results are keeping the pressure on Mason, and there are already rumors that the board may replace the man who has been the CEO since he co-founded the company in 2008.
His fate could rest in the hands of a very small group of people. Eric P. Lefkofsky, Groupon's executive chairman and another co-founder, owns shares that represent 27.7% of the voting power of the board. Accel Partners and New Enterprise Associates also hold a substantial number of voting shares, and could swing a vote against Mason.
One of the criticisms of Mason is that he has allowed both smaller companies and larger ones such as Amazon (AMZN) and Walmart (WMT), to siphon off so much market share from Groupon. In part because of Mason's failures to defend the business from competition, Groupon's financial results have been horrible, causing concerns it will not survive as an independent company. In the most recent quarter, revenue rose to $569 million from $430 million. That growth rate of 32% is below what would be expected of a dominant Web 2.0 company. Despite top line growth, Groupon lost $54 million in 2011. The revenue improvement for the latest quarter was a slowdown from the overall 52% rate for the first three-quarters of the year.
Read joined the troubled chip company in April 2011 with the idea that he could engineer a badly needed turnaround. AMD shares have plunged 72% since then, and there is virtually no case to be made that his tenure has not done more to harm than good to the company.
At the end of the third quarter of 2012, AMD's share of the microprocessor market worldwide was less than 17%. Intel (INTC) had nearly the entire balance of the market and was gaining ground.
One major factor in AMD's decline is entirely beyond its control: The PC market to which its fortunes are so intimately linked has been on a long decline, with shipments falling 8% in the third quarter alone, according to industry research firm Gartner. Where AMD has some measure of control over its fate is in its diversification beyond PCs into the fast-growing tablet and smartphone markets, currently dominated by Qualcomm (QCOM) and Samsung. Intel has begun to gain sales in those markets with its Atom x86 chip. AMD, on the other hand, under Read, has made no headway in this important sector.
Company: Electronic Arts (EA) Share Price Change in 2012: -29%
Riccitiello joined EA as CEO in April 2007, and the game company's fortunes have run very much downhill since then. EA shares are off more than 75% in the past five years, and it had a combined net loss of almost $2.5 billion over fiscal years 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011.
During the most recently reported quarter, revenue fell from $715 million to $711 million. EA's net loss was $381 million compared to a loss of $340 million in the same quarter a year earlier. Wall Street was further disappointed by the company's outlook for the next quarter.
The case against Riccitiello is easy to make. He has been unable to move a significant share of the company's revenue to new social media and mobile platforms -- where the action in the gaming business is . In July, 2011, EA bought PopCap Games for $650 million plus earn outs to move further into the social game and smartphone sectors. It bought Playfish in November 2009, paying as much as $400 million, to reach the Facebook online game sector. But EA continues to be flanked by companies such as Zynga Inc. (ZNGA), and its revenue does not show that it has made much progress with its diversification efforts beyond legacy platforms like game consoles.
Company: Avon Products Inc. (AVP) Share price YTD: -38%
McCoy joined Avon Products as CEO on April 12. Avon's share price is down 38% since then, a remarkably poor record. McCoy was brought in to turn around a company almost ruined by her predecessor, Andrea Jung. In the third quarter, revenue dropped 8% to $2.6 billion. Net income dropped 81% to $32 million. Results for the first three-quarters of the year were not any better. If strong leadership is highlighted by the ability to articulate the plans that will make the company successful in the future, McCoy has failed. Among the comments in the most recent quarterly report was: "Management has the team fully aligned around actions that will accelerate top-line growth, reduce costs and improve working capital." Shortly after Avon released its quarterly results, it announced it would cut 1,500 jobs and close its South Korea and Vietnam operations. This was part of a program to save $400 million annually. McCoy explained these moves "begin the process of returning Avon to sustainable growth." She did not explain how cutting costs brings about better sales.
Company: Dell (DELL) Share price YTD: -30%
It is usually hard to fire a founder who is also the CEO of the company he started. Michael Dell may be the most powerful case for breaking this precedent. Dell's shares are not only down 30% this year, but they have fallen 59% over the past five years. For the most recent quarter, revenue fell from $15.4 billion to $13.7 billion. Net income fell to $475 million from $893 million in the same quarter a year ago. For the first nine months of the fiscal year, results were equally disappointing. The most damning evidence against Michael Dell is that he has been much too slow to diversify his company into either the enterprise markets, which are controlled by such companies as International Business Machines Corp. (IBM) and Oracle Corp. (ORCL), or into the smart device business, as Apple and Google Inc. (GOOG) have. M&A activity has included deals such as the recent one to buy Gale Technologies. The company is not large enough to give Dell critical mass in the enterprise, consulting, software and services business, which drives the strong results at industry leader IBM.
Gardner became Windstream CEO in late 2005. One of Gardner's great accomplishments as head of Windstream, according to the company, is that he "has completed nine acquisitions since its 2006 spinoff from Alltel Corp." Windstream's stock performance has been weak so far this year, as well as over the longer term of five years. Wall St. has shied from the Windstream shares because, although revenue has risen because of M&A, the bottom line has not. Revenue has gone from $3 billion in 2006 to $4.3 billion in the most recent fiscal year. Net income has dropped from $545 million in 2006 to $172 million in the most recent fiscal year. Matters have gotten even worse recently. In the most recently reported quarter, pro forma revenue was $1.55 billion, a drop of about 1% from the same period a year ago. Net income on the same basis was $54 million, down from of $78 million a year ago. Where has Gardner failed shareholders? He has diversified into very weak businesses, particularly in the disappearing landline sector. Gardner's efforts in high-speed Internet and competition from alternate broadband offerings continues to damage Windstream.
Company: J.C. Penney Co. Inc. (JCP) Share price YTD: -42%
Johnson became CEO of J.C. Penney in November 2011. In a little over a year, he has crippled what was already a vulnerable retailer. Johnson, the former retail chief at Apple Inc. (AAPL), serves at the pleasure of William Ackman of Pershing Square, which owned, as of the last proxy, 18% of J.C. Penney. Vornado Realty Trust also owns nearly 11%, which means the two groups together control much of the sentiment of the board. Ackman will get tired of losing money, or perhaps the holders of Pershing fund will. It is amazing Ackman has stayed with Johnson as long as he has, given J.C. Penney's performance. In the most recently reported quarter, revenue fell from $4 billion to $2.9 billion. J.C. Penney posted a loss of $123 million. The figures for the first three-quarters of the year were just as bad. Revenue fell from $11.8 billion in the same nine months a year ago period to $9.1 billion. The loss for the nine months was $433 million. Johnson will not make it through 2013. The question is whether J.C. Penney will, or will the board need to sell the retailer off in pieces.