Guildford pub bombings: New evidence 50 years after IRA attack

Tanya Gupta & Angus Moorat - BBC News, South East
The aftermath of an IRA bomb at the Horse and Groom pub in Guildford, Surrey
The IRA later admitted responsibility to the Guildford bombings in the 1970s [Getty Images]

New evidence on the Guildford pub bombings has emerged 50 years after the IRA detonated two devices in the town.

Surrey Police told a family of one of the five people killed in the attack that the next step "would be a new criminal investigation", lawyers said.

But officers will not launch an inquiry before a new law comes in that would help shield perpetrators, they added.

Police said they would not comment until they had shared information with all the families of victims.

KRW Law said a post-inquest assessment had, according to Surrey Police, "identified a potential forensic line of enquiry and the next step would be a new criminal investigation".

However, the firm said Surrey Police had stated it was not advancing any further investigations before the commencement of the Northern Ireland Legacy Act on 1 May. The act allows those involved with The Troubles to seek immunity from prosecution.

Four soldiers and a civilian died in the blast in Guildford's Horse and Groom pub in October 1974.

Another bomb detonated 30 minutes later at the Seven Stars.

The Guildford Four and Maguire Seven were wrongly-convicted for the attacks in one of the UK's biggest miscarriages of justice. An IRA terror cell later claimed responsibility.

Those who died were 21-year-old civilian Paul Craig and soldiers Ann Hamilton, 19, Caroline Slater, 18, William Forsyth, 18, and John Hunter, 17. Sixty-five people were injured.

Clockwise from top left: Plasterer Paul Craig, 21, and soldiers Caroline Slater, 18, John Hunter, 17, William Forsyth, 18, Ann Hamilton, 19
(Clockwise from top left) Paul Craig, 21, Caroline Slater, 18, John Hunter, 17, William Forsyth, 18, Ann Hamilton, 19, died in an explosion at the Horse and Groom [BBC]

Cassandra Hamilton, Ann's sister, told the BBC: "[The police] said that there was a new piece of evidence that needed to be analysed forensically."

But she said police didn't think they could get the evidence analysed before 1 May.

She said police wrote to the Home Secretary in October but did not get a response until January.

She said: "If they had this evidence in October, then October to May is seven months. If they sent the letter in October, then obviously they had the evidence before that."

(L-R) Gerry Conlon (1991), Patrick Armstrong (1991), Paul Hill (1989), Carole Richardson (1989)
Wrongly convicted Gerry Conlon, Paddy Armstrong, Paul Hill and Carole Richardson served 15 years in jail [PA]

Ms Hamilton added that the family did not know what the evidence was - whether it was a fingerprint, or DNA, or anything else.

"We need answers for my sister," she said.

KRW solicitor Barry O'Donnell said: "The timing by Surrey Police in this matter raises too many questions."

He said there were questions over the nature of this "new" lead, over how long this new evidence has been available to Surrey Police and when decisions were taken not to investigate this "new" forensic evidence, and whether Surrey Police should and could continue its investigation.

According to KRW, police told the family the new lead was something the Independent Commission for Reconciliation and Information Recovery (ICRIR) could possibly advance after 1 May.

A Surrey Police spokeswoman said: "We do not feel it would be appropriate to comment or provide any further information until we have shared the information with all the families involved.

"We will provide further comment as and when it is appropriate to do so."

Follow BBC Surrey on Facebook, and on  X. Send your story ideas to  southeasttoday@bbc.co.uk  or WhatsApp us on 08081 002250.

Advertisement