Women sue California hospital that put cameras in delivery rooms

Scores of women have gone back to court alleging that a Southern California hospital that installed hidden cameras in three labor and delivery rooms violated their privacy while they were "emotionally and physically exposed, and at their most vulnerable."

The claim was first filed as a class action in 2016 but was denied class action status. It was refiled last week by 81 women who underwent procedures from July 2012 to June 2013, when the cameras were rolling at the Women's Center at Sharp Grossmont Hospital in La Mesa, a northeastern suburb of San Diego.

As it did in 2016, Sharp HealthCare, the hospital's nonprofit parent company, acknowledged in a statement Tuesday that it installed the motion-activated cameras and computer monitors, saying they were meant to catch the thief or thieves responsible for the disappearance of a powerful anesthetic from drug carts.

"Although the cameras were intended to record only individuals in front of the anesthesia carts removing drugs, others, including patients and medical personnel in the operating rooms, were at times visible to the cameras and recorded," the medical company said.

"We sincerely regret that our efforts to ensure medication security may have caused any distress to those we serve," it said, adding that images taken by the cameras "were used for this particular case only and have not been used again."

Related: Best Hospitals: 2018-2019

20 PHOTOS
Best Hospitals: 2018-2019
See Gallery
Best Hospitals: 2018-2019

20. Brigham and Women's Hospital

Where: Boston
Honor Roll points: 177
Last year's Honor Roll rank: Not ranked

See all of this hospital's rankings and ratings.

19. Duke University Hospital

Where: Durham, North Carolina
Honor Roll points: 178
Last year's Honor Roll rank: 17th

See all of this hospital's rankings and ratings.

18. Mount Sinai Hospital

Where: New York
Honor Roll points: 192
Last year's Honor Roll rank: 18th

See all of this hospital's rankings and ratings.

17. Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Where: Nashville, Tennessee
Honor Roll points: 198
Last year's Honor Roll rank: Not ranked

See all of this hospital's rankings and ratings.

15 (tie). UPMC Presbyterian Shadyside

Where: Pittsburgh 
Honor Roll points: 208
Last year's Honor Roll rank: 14th

See all of this hospital's rankings and ratings.

15 (tie). NYU Langone Hospitals

Where: New York
Honor Roll points: 208
Last year's Honor Roll rank: 19th

See all of this hospital's rankings and ratings.

14. Hospitals of the University of Pennsylvania-Penn Presbyterian

Where: Philadelphia 
Honor Roll points: 225
Last year's Honor Roll rank: 10th

See all of this hospital's rankings and ratings.

13. Northwestern Memorial Hospital

Where: Chicago 
Honor Roll points: 228
Last year's Honor Roll rank: 13th

See all of this hospital's rankings and ratings.

11 (tie). Mayo Clinic Phoenix

Where: Phoenix
Honor Roll points: 241
Last year's Honor Roll rank: 20th

See all of this hospital's rankings and ratings.

11 (tie). Barnes-Jewish Hospital

Where: St. Louis 
Honor Roll points: 241
Last year's Honor Roll rank: 12th

See all of this hospital's rankings and ratings.

10. New York-Presbyterian Hospital

Where: New York
Honor Roll points: 242
Last year's Honor Roll rank: 8th

See all of this hospital's rankings and ratings.

9. Stanford Health Care-Stanford Hospital

Where: Stanford, California
Honor Roll points: 250
Last year's Honor Roll rank: 9th

See all of this hospital's rankings and ratings.

8. Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

Where: Los Angeles 
Honor Roll points: 252
Last year's Honor Roll rank: 11th

See all of this hospital's rankings and ratings.

7. UCLA Medical Center

Where: Los Angeles 
Honor Roll points: 267
Last year's Honor Roll rank: 7th

See all of this hospital's rankings and ratings.

6. UCSF Medical Center

Where: San Francisco
Honor Roll points: 296
Last year's Honor Roll rank: 5th

See all of this hospital's rankings and ratings.

5. University of Michigan Hospitals-Michigan Medicine

Where: Ann Arbor
Honor Roll points: 324
Last year's Honor Roll rank: 6th

See all of this hospital's rankings and ratings.

4. Massachusetts General Hospital

Where: Boston 
Honor Roll points: 354
Last year's Honor Roll rank: 4th

See all of this hospital's rankings and ratings.

3. Johns Hopkins Hospital

Where: Baltimore 
Honor Roll points: 355
Last year's Honor Roll rank: 3rd

See all of this hospital's rankings and ratings.

2. Cleveland Clinic

Where: Cleveland 
Honor Roll points: 385
Last year's Honor Roll rank: 2nd

See all of this hospital's rankings and ratings.

1. Mayo Clinic

Where: Rochester, Minnesota
Honor Roll points: 414
Last year's Honor Roll rank: 1st

See all of this hospital's rankings and ratings.

HIDE CAPTION
SHOW CAPTION
of
SEE ALL
BACK TO SLIDE

The new suit, which was filed Friday in San Diego County Superior Court, seeks unspecified damages at a jury trial for invasion of privacy, unlawful recording of confidential information, negligent infliction of emotional distress and breach of fiduciary duty involving as many as 1,800 women.

It alleges that patients' "most sensitive genital areas" were visible at times and that the cameras were positioned where they could sometimes record the women's faces.

"I am a mom of four girls. I lead by example," Jessica Lincoln, the lead complainant, told NBC San Diego. "I'm a pretty black-and-white person as far as what is right and what is wrong, and this is wrong."

Another complainant, Melissa Escalera, said she was secretly recorded while giving birth to her daughter by emergency cesarean section.

"When I arrived in an ambulance and was wheeled into the operating room on a gurney, my concern was with my daughter, who was in distress and coming six weeks early," Escalera said.

"I was not planning on having a baby that September 4th day," she said. "It was a highly stressful and emotional time for my family and my doctor. No one ever asked me to record one of my most tender, life-changing moments.

"I would have never agreed to be recorded in that vulnerable moment," she said.

Sharp said it couldn't comment further because of the litigation.

Read Full Story

Sign up for Breaking News by AOL to get the latest breaking news alerts and updates delivered straight to your inbox.

Subscribe to our other newsletters

Emails may offer personalized content or ads. Learn more. You may unsubscribe any time.