Trump administration seeks to limit court's 'sanctuary cities' order

WASHINGTON, June 18 (Reuters) - The Trump administration, escalating its fight with so-called sanctuary cities, asked the U.S. Supreme Court on Monday to narrow a lower court's nationwide order preventing the federal government from denying public safety grants to municipalities that limit cooperation on immigration enforcement.

SEE ALSO: A Getty photographer tells the story behind a heartbreaking photo he took of a migrant girl sobbing while agents questioned her mom at the border

The Justice Department asked the high court to make the injunction issued by a federal judge in Chicago cover only that city and not the entire country. Republican President Donald Trump's administration has gone on an offensive against Democratic-governed cities and states that protect undocumented immigrants as part of his hard-line immigration policies.

The Justice Department said the injunction "strays far beyond the traditional, proper role of federal courts." The justices likely will ask the city of Chicago for a response before deciding on the request.

Attorney General Jeff Sessions has criticized lower courts for imposing nationwide injunctions against some of the administration's most contentious policies.

Chicago sued the administration last year after Sessions said he would cut off cities from certain grants unless they allowed federal immigration authorities unlimited access to local jails and provided advance notice before releasing anyone wanted for immigration violations.

32 PHOTOS
Sanctuary cities in the United States
See Gallery
Sanctuary cities in the United States

Washington, DC

(Danita Delimont via Getty Images)

New York City, New York

(Photo: Getty Images) 

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 

(Photo: Rudolf Balasko)

Los Angeles, California

(Photo: Chris Pritchard)

San Francisco, California

(Photo: Noah Clayton)

San Diego, California

(Photo: Aleksey Butov)

Detroit, Michigan 

(Photo: Jumper)

Chicago, Illinois 

(Photo: Shutterstock)

Minneapolis, Minnesota 

(Photo: Rudy Balasko)

Denver, Colorado

(Photo: Chris Rogers)

Baltimore, Maryland

(Photo: Getty Images)

Seattle, Washington

(Photo: Alamy)

Portland, Oregon

(Photo: Alamy)

Cambridge, Massachusetts

(Photo: Cassandra Hubbart, AOL)

Berkeley, California

(constantgardener via Getty Images)

Watsonville, California

(Mark Miller Photos via Getty Images)

 East Haven, Connecticut

(Photo by Spencer Platt/Getty Images)

Hartford, Connecticut

(SeanPavonePhoto via Getty Images)

West Palm Beach, Florida

(ddmitr via Getty Images)

Louisville, Kentucky

(hstiver via Getty Images)

New Orleans, Louisiana 

(donvictorio via Getty Images)

Amherst, Massachusetts

(DenisTangneyJr via Getty Images)

Boston, Massachusetts

(SeanPavonePhoto via Getty Images)

Lawrence, Massachusetts

(DenisTangneyJr via Getty Images)

Somerville, Massachusetts

(DenisTangneyJr via Getty Images)

Jackson, Mississippi

(SeanPavonePhoto via Getty Images)

Newark, New Jersey

(Mary A. Brown via Getty Images)

Albany, New York

(cbell7153 via Getty Images)

Ithaca, New York

(Photo by John Greim/LightRocket via Getty Images)

Springfield, Oregon

(Joshua Rainey via Getty Images)

Providence, Rhode Island

(sgoodwin4813 via Getty Images)

Burlington, Vermont

(DenisTangneyJr via Getty Images)

HIDE CAPTION
SHOW CAPTION
of
SEE ALL
BACK TO SLIDE

Since the injunction was issued last year, the Justice Department said it has not issued grants to the nearly 1,000 state and local jurisdictions that have applied, amounting to more than $250 million in funds.

The Chicago-based 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the injunction in April, saying Sessions likely exceeded his authority in imposing the conditions on the grants. The 7th Circuit said that because nationwide injunctions have such a powerful effect, judges should rarely grant them, but doing so was proper in this case.

Nationwide injunctions also have blocked Trump's bid to wind down a program protecting immigrants brought into the United States illegally as children from deportation, and to exempt more religious-based employers from a requirement that health insurance provided to employees covers birth control for women.

(Reporting by Andrew Chung; Editing by Will Dunham)

Read Full Story