Judge mulls arguments in border wall lawsuit

SAN DIEGO (KSWB) --  A San Diego federal judge listened to two and a half hours of arguments Friday about a lawsuit challenging the Trump administrations plan to bypass environmental laws to build a new security wall along the U.S. Mexico border.

The case, which is being brought by the state of California and multiple groups, challenges the Department of Homeland Security's power to waive environmental laws in their construction of a border wall.

The plaintiffs, the state of California and lawyers for the Trump administration presented their arguments to District Court Judge Gonzalo Curiel in his San Diego courtroom. He took the arguments under submission and is expected to make a ruling on the case next week.

Outside the courtroom, a couple of dozen demonstrators gathered holding signs protesting the wall.

The plaintiffs argue that the Trump administration is violating the Constitution and state laws because it is not "conducting any environmental review or complying with any environmental protection laws." But the federal government, citing a 1996 immigration law, says it has the authority to waive environmental laws in order to build the wall, a top campaign promise of President Donald Trump.

RELATED: California judge mulls arguments in border wall lawsuit  

5 PHOTOS
California judge mulls arguments in border wall lawsuit
See Gallery
California judge mulls arguments in border wall lawsuit
A San Diego federal judge, who Trump had once called biased because of his heritage, listened to arguments Friday about a lawsuit challenging President Trump’s proposed border wall.
A San Diego federal judge, who Trump had once called biased because of his heritage, listened to arguments Friday about a lawsuit challenging President Trump’s proposed border wall.
A San Diego federal judge, who Trump had once called biased because of his heritage, listened to arguments Friday about a lawsuit challenging President Trump’s proposed border wall.
A San Diego federal judge, who Trump had once called biased because of his heritage, listened to arguments Friday about a lawsuit challenging President Trump’s proposed border wall.
A San Diego federal judge, who Trump had once called biased because of his heritage, listened to arguments Friday about a lawsuit challenging President Trump’s proposed border wall.
HIDE CAPTION
SHOW CAPTION
of
SEE ALL
BACK TO SLIDE

The administration notes that previous challenges to this law have been unsuccessful, saying it "has been repeatedly upheld in the face of legal challenges."

California Supervising Deputy Attorney General Michael Cayaban disagreed with the Trump Administration's position that the court did not have jurisdiction to decide the issue.

Curiel said he thought he did and asked for more briefing on the case. A decision is expected next week.

Brian Segee, an attorney representing the Center for Biological Diversity, said the government's power to waive certain state laws was being used "unfairly.''

Read Full Story

Sign up for Breaking News by AOL to get the latest breaking news alerts and updates delivered straight to your inbox.

Subscribe to our other newsletters

Emails may offer personalized content or ads. Learn more. You may unsubscribe any time.