Chicago debates giving cops ‘textalyzers’ to test drivers’ smartphones

CHICAGO (WGN) -- Could Chicago cops soon have the technology to tell if distracted drivers were texting or using their smartphone before getting in an accident?

A new piece of technology called a “textalyzer” debated at Chicago City Hall Thursday would make it possible for officers to scan drivers' phones after pulling them over. State legislatures in New York and Tennessee are also considering the technology, but so far Chicago is believed to be the first city to discuss it.

The City Council's Public Safety Committee discussed the growing issue of distracted driving Thursday. According to experts, distracted driving is blamed for the biggest spike in traffic deaths in 50 years. In some studies, as many as 50 percent of teenagers admit to texting or emailing while driving.

Ben Lieberman's 19-year-old son Evan was killed in a distracted driving accident in New York in 2011, and now he's pushing for using technology to prevent similar fatal accidents.

RELATED: 25 cities with best drivers 

21 PHOTOS
25 cities with best drivers
See Gallery
25 cities with best drivers

Top 25 Best Drivers: Rockford, Illinois

This year: #25
Last year: #28

(Henryk Sadura via Getty Images)

Top 25 Best Drivers: Cary, North Carolina

This year: #24
Last year: #37

(Dougtone/Flickr)

Top 25 Best Drivers: Eugene, Oregon

This year: #23
Last year: #10

(Photo by Brad Sloan via Getty Images)

Top 25 Best Drivers: Mesa, Arizona

This year: #22
Last year: #11

(Richard Cummins via Getty Images)

Top 25 Best Drivers: Omaha, Nebraska

This year: #21
Last year: #39

(Walter Bibikow via Getty Images)

Top 25 Best Drivers: Gilbert, Arizona

This year: #20
Last year: #29

(donut2D/Flickr)

Top 25 Best Drivers: Lakewood, Colorado

This year: #19
Last year: N/A

(Photo By Helen H. Richardson/ The Denver Post)

Top 25 Best Drivers: Reno, Nevada

This year: #17
Last year: #6

(Marvin E. Newman via Getty Images)

Top 25 Best Drivers: Wichita, Kansas

This year: #16
Last year: #27

(Davel5957 via Getty Images)

Top 25 Best Drivers: Cape Coral, Florida

This year: #15
Last year: #40

(dconvertini/Flickr)

Top 25 Best Drivers: Colorado Springs, Colorado

This year: #14
Last year: #15

(Doug Pensinger via Getty Images)

Top 25 Best Drivers: Kansas City, Missouri

This year: #12
Last year: #13

(RudyBalasko via Getty Images)

Top 25 Best Drivers: Cedar Rapids, Iowa

This year: #11
Last year: #16

(Stijn Debrouwere/Flickr)

Top 25 Best Drivers: Olathe, Kansas

This year: #10
Last year: #14

(John Sleezer/Kansas City Star/MCT via Getty Images)

Top 25 Best Drivers: Madison, Wisconsin

This year: #9
Last year: #5

(Henry Lederer via Getty Images)

Top 25 Best Drivers: Laredo, Texas

This year: #8
Last year: #30

(Photo By Hyoung Chang/The Denver Post via Getty Images)

Top 25 Best Drivers: Visalia, California

This year: #7
Last year: #8

(Ray Bouknight/Flickr)

Top 25 Best Drivers: Montgomery, Alabama

This year: #6
Last year: #9

(John Coletti via Getty Images)

Top 25 Best Drivers: Huntsville, Alabama

This year: #5
Last year: #7

(Toddmedia/Getty Images)

Top 25 Best Drivers: Boise, Idaho

This year: #3
Last year: #2

(Darin Oswald/Idaho Statesman/MCT via Getty Images)

HIDE CAPTION
SHOW CAPTION
of
SEE ALL
BACK TO SLIDE

“More Americans will die from distracted driving than from the Vietnam war," Lieberman said while testifying before the committee. “To understand the problem is to implement deterrents, to create the appropriate social stigma.”

Among the solutions Lieberman supports is a device or software program that functions like a breathalyzer for smartphones.

Jody Wacker, an executive with the company Cellebrite, says the company's prototype "textalyzer" can be used to detect whether drivers had been distracted by their cellphones before an accident.

“It would be used by law enforcement, depending on how the law is written," Wacker said. "It would plug into the driver’s phone, the phone would never leave the driver’s hand and it scans just the operating system logs to see the activity on the phone.”

Advocates of the technology say it wouldn’t download data like phone numbers, e-mails or photos, but would only show if the device had been in use. But privacy advocates like Ed Yohnka at the ACLU of Illinois say the idea raises concerns.

"What we don’t know is how much information is gathered and under what circumstances," Yohnka said.

He says any information needed is available through the use of court-approved warrants. Both the company and proponents of such devices argue that they can be designed not to collect any personal information.

"This is showing typing and swiping without any ability to get to the personal content like phone conversations – it’s jumping through hoops to respect privacy," Lieberman said.

Either way, the technology is far from becoming adopted in Chicago, as the Public Safety Committee just approved a resolution asking Chicago police to review the technology.

Read Full Story

Sign up for Breaking News by AOL to get the latest breaking news alerts and updates delivered straight to your inbox.

Subscribe to our other newsletters

Emails may offer personalized content or ads. Learn more. You may unsubscribe any time.