States attempt to bypass Trump and take on the fight to make sure Obamacare doesn't 'explode'

A group of 15 states, along with Washington, DC, is stepping into the fight to save Obamacare's insurance exchanges.

The states have filed a motion to intervene in a court case that could decide whether or not critical payments, called cost-sharing reduction (CSR) payments, are made to insurers in the Affordable Care Act's individual insurance exchanges.

RELATED: A look at the Senate's all-male health care working group

13 PHOTOS
A look at the Senate's all-male health care working group
See Gallery
A look at the Senate's all-male health care working group
U.S. Senator Tom Cotton (R-AR) (L) and Senator David Perdue (R-GA) (R) unveil legislation aimed at curbing legal immigration by halving the number of legal immigrants admitted into the United States, at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, U.S. February 7, 2017. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst
U.S. Senator Cory Gardner (R-CO) smiles after he was ceremonially sworn-in by Vice President Joseph Biden in the Old Senate Chamber on Capitol Hill in Washington January 6, 2015. REUTERS/Larry Downing (UNITED STATES - Tags: POLITICS HEADSHOT)
U.S. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) speaks during a media briefing on Capitol Hill in Washington, U.S. April 25, 2017. REUTERS/Joshua Roberts
U.S. Senator Rob Portman (R-OH) speaks during a session called "The New Congress" at the Wall Street Journal's CEO Council meeting in Washington December 2, 2014. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque/File Photo
U.S. Senator Pat Toomey (R-PA) speaks to the 38th annual Conservative Political Action Conference meeting in Washington DC, U.S. February 10, 2011. REUTERS/Larry Downing/File Photo
U.S. Senator John Thune addresses the media during the 2017 "Congress of Tomorrow" Joint Republican Issues Conference in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, U.S. January 25, 2017. REUTERS/Mark Makela
U.S. Senator John Cornyn (R-TX)questions Supreme Court nominee judge Neil Gorsuch during a Senate Judiciary Committee confirmation hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington March 21, 2017. REUTERS/Joshua Roberts
Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) questions Supreme Court nominee judge Neil Gorsuch during his Senate Judiciary Committee confirmation hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington March 21, 2017. REUTERS/Joshua Roberts
Chairman of the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee Lamar Alexander speaks during Rep. Tom Price's (R-GA) nomination hearing to be Health and Human Services secretary in Washington, U.S., January 18, 2017. REUTERS/Joshua Roberts
Senator Orrin Hatch (R-UT) during the second day of confirmation hearings on Senator Jeff Sessions (R-AL) nomination to be U.S. attorney general in Washington, U.S. January 11, 2017. REUTERS/Joshua Roberts
Sen. Mike Lee (R-UT) speaks at a rally for nominee Neil Gorsuch outside the Supreme Court in Washington, D.C., U.S. March 29, 2017. REUTERS/Aaron P. Bernstein
UNITED STATES - APRIL 4: Sen. John Barrasso, R-Wyo., speaks as Senate Republican leaders hold their media availability focusing on the confirmation of Neil Gorsuch as associate justice of the Supreme Court following their policy lunch on Tuesday, April 4, 2017. (Photo By Bill Clark/CQ Roll Call)
HIDE CAPTION
SHOW CAPTION
of
SEE ALL
BACK TO SLIDE

In 2015, the House of Representative filed a lawsuit against the Obama administration to prevent the White House from funding the CSR payments in their current fashion. The GOP-led House argued that since the payments were not appropriated by Congress as part of the ACA, they were unconstitutional.

(Check out a full explanation of the CSR payments »)

In 2016, a federal judge ruled in favor of the House, putting CSR payments in jeopardy. The Obama administration filed an appeal. Now, President Donald Trump's administration must decide whether to continue or drop the appeal.

Trump has repeatedly threatened to drop the case and end the payments, which experts say would cause premiums to skyrocket and likely lead to even more insurers ditching the Obamacare exchanges. The states say his threats are why they decided to step in by filing a motion to intervene, allowing them to continue the appeal even if Trump drops it.

SEE ALSO: Poll: Americans overwhelmingly like Obamacare more than Trumpcare

"If successful, the suit could — to use the President's expression — 'explode' the entire Act," the filing says. "Until recently, States and their residents could rely on the Executive Branch to respond to this attack. Now, events and statements, including from the President himself, have made clear that any such reliance is misplaced."

The states argued that pulling the payments would endanger the health insurance of millions of people on the exchanges.

From the filing (emphasis added):

"The loss of funds and financial uncertainty threatened by this case would lead at least to higher health insurance costs for consumers, and more likely to many insurers abandoning the individual health insurance market. The number of uninsured Americans would go back up, hurting vulnerable individuals and directly burdening the States. The wrong decision could trigger the very system-wide 'death spirals' that central ACA features, such as stable financing, were designed to avoid."

The states also argued that the rise in the uninsured population would put a financial burden on state budgets, since they would have to cover more hospital costs when uninsured get care. Thus, they argued they should be able to carry on the case even if the Trump administration drops the appeal.

The filing says the need to step in is urgent, since insurance companies are already leaving the exchanges due to uncertainty. States including Virginia, Iowa, and Nebraska have all seen insurers ditch their exchanges over the past month.

"Meanwhile, the President has increasingly made clear that he views decisions about providing access to health insurance for millions of Americans—including the decision whether to continue defending this appeal—as little more than political bargaining chips," the filings said. "The States and their residents cannot continue to rely on the Executive Branch to represent them in this appeal."

The intervention must be approved by the court in order for the states to become part of the case.

Here's a rundown of the states (and DC) on the filing:

  • California
  • New York
  • Connecticut
  • Delaware
  • Hawaii
  • Illinois
  • Iowa
  • Kentucky
  • Maryland
  • Massachusetts
  • Minnesota
  • New Mexico
  • Pennsylvania
  • Vermont
  • Washington
  • The District of Columbia

NOW WATCH: 'Really?': A reporter calls out Huckabee's claim that 'countless' FBI employees were happy with Comey's firing

More from Business Insider:

Read Full Story

Sign up for Breaking News by AOL to get the latest breaking news alerts and updates delivered straight to your inbox.

Subscribe to our other newsletters

Emails may offer personalized content or ads. Learn more. You may unsubscribe any time.