Trump's team is considering a controversial plan that could make his promise to cut taxes harder to keep
The Trump administration is considering a major shift to tax deductions, new reports have suggested, in a move that could make it even harder to pass tax reform.
According to Axios' Jonathan Swan, Trump's top economic adviser and former Goldman Sachs executive Gary Cohn is "warming" to a plan that would eliminate the ability to deduct state and local taxes from federal tax returns. This plan has long been favored by conservative groups.
But the move would likely be a deal breaker for many Democrats and even some Republicans, potentially hampering any bipartisan cooperation on the tax overhaul.
Currently, the money Americans pay toward some state and local taxes can be taken as a deduction from their federal return, lowering their overall tax bill. Itemized filers can subtract the cost of state and local sales, property, and income taxes for their federal returns.
Based on an estimate by the Congressional Budget Office and Joint Committee on Taxation, the deduction could cost roughly $1.3 trillion in forgone revenue to the federal government between 2017 and 2026. In 2017 alone, the JCT and CBO said, the federal government will miss out on $96 billion.
The two largest beneficiaries of his deduction (also called the SALT deduction), according to the Tax Policy Center, are higher earners and certain states with a lot of high-income residents.
"About 10 percent of tax filers with incomes less than $50,000 claimed the SALT deduction in 2014, compared with about 81 percent of tax filers with incomes exceeding $100,000," said the analysis from the Tax Policy Center. "The latter group, which made up about 16 percent of tax filers, accounted for about 75 percent of the total dollar amount of SALT deductions claimed. The average claim in this affluent group was of about $12,300."
Tax Policy Center
Most of the claimants that benefit from the SALT deduction live in traditionally Democratic states, primarily California and New York. Those two states receive around 30.5% of the total benefits from the deduction, according to the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget.
According to Bloomberg's Sahil Kapur, many conservatives are in favor of eliminating the deduction, including tax reform advocate Grover Norquist, the Club for Growth, and the Heritage Foundation.
Why it could be helpful for Trump's tax reform
Trump's team and the GOP have advocated for deficit-neutral tax reform — meaning that in order to slash the tax rate for corporate and middle-income Americans, revenue would have to be made up in other ways.
Eliminating the state and local deduction would seem like an attractive option. It hits high-income Americans primarily in states that did not vote for Trump in the election and fulfills Trump's promise to fill tax loopholes to finance his cuts.
According to Axios, the White House said it is "still in listening mode, hearing from key stakeholders" on any aspects of a tax plan.
The political reality
Though it may be popular among certain segments of the GOP, there are several problems with its potential inclusion in a final package.
For one thing, Trump officials have suggested that they want to bring forward a bipartisan tax reform plan, and this move would threaten alienating blue states.
And some more Republican-leaning states have a larger number of SALT deduction beneficiaries and lawmakers from those areas could also be against the change. Texas, Tennessee, and Florida benefit significantly from the ability to deduct sales taxes since they have no income taxes.
Taking away the deduction could set up another intra-party divide for Trump between states that rely more heavily on the deduction and those that do not.
Such a situation would shape up similarly to the problems that faced the American Health Care Act in March: Democrats across the board fighting against the plan and a subset of Republicans against the provision, making it a potential political landmine.
- MARK CUBAN: Gary Cohn is leading a 'Democratic invasion' of Trump's White House
- A Yale history professor explains how governments can use disasters and tragedies to control society
- Trump attacks 'disaster' Democrat candidate ahead of today's crucial special election