Nate Silver: 'There really was a liberal media bubble'

FiveThirtyEight editor-in-chief Nate Silver published an analysis on Friday of the "liberal media bubble" that led to people underestimating President Donald Trump's chances of winning the 2016 election.

The post, headlined "There Really Was A Liberal Media Bubble," concluded that "groupthink produced a failure of the 'wisdom of crowds' and an underestimate of Trump's chances."

"Much of The New York Times's coverage, for instance, implied that Clinton's odds were close to 100%," Silver wrote. "In an article on Oct. 17 — more than three weeks before Election Day — they portrayed the race as being effectively over, the only question being whether Clinton should seek a landslide or instead assist down-ballot Democrats."

He contended that the failure in predicting the outcome of the 2016 presidential election was "not so much with the polls but with the people who were analyzing them."

Silver has made a name for himself by predicting elections using data analysis. He predicted that Hillary Clinton, the Democratic nominee for president, would win, but put Trump's chances higher than other outlets did.

8 PHOTOS
Never-before-seen photos of First Lady Hillary Clinton released in book
See Gallery
Never-before-seen photos of First Lady Hillary Clinton released in book
(Photo by Robert McNeely via Briscoe Center for American History at the University of Texas at Austin)
(Photo by Robert McNeely via Briscoe Center for American History at the University of Texas at Austin)
(Photo by Robert McNeely via Briscoe Center for American History at the University of Texas at Austin)
(Photo by Robert McNeely via Briscoe Center for American History at the University of Texas at Austin)
(Photo by Robert McNeely via Briscoe Center for American History at the University of Texas at Austin)
(Photo by Robert McNeely via Briscoe Center for American History at the University of Texas at Austin)
(Photo by Robert McNeely via Briscoe Center for American History at the University of Texas at Austin)
HIDE CAPTION
SHOW CAPTION
of
SEE ALL
BACK TO SLIDE

Silver discussed "unthinkably bias" that seemed to be present in the predictions for the 2016 election.

"Political experts aren't a very diverse group and tend to place a lot of faith in the opinions of other experts and other members of the political establishment," Silver wrote. "Once a consensus view is established, it tends to reinforce itself until and unless there's very compelling evidence for the contrary position. Social media, especially Twitter, can amplify the groupthink further. It can be an echo chamber."

NOW WATCH: Here's how Attorney General Sessions could shut down the legal marijuana industry overnight

See Also:

SEE ALSO: 'There are no sacred cows': Breitbart's honeymoon with establishment wing of Trump White House may be over

Read Full Story

Sign up for Breaking News by AOL to get the latest breaking news alerts and updates delivered straight to your inbox.

Subscribe to our other newsletters

Emails may offer personalized content or ads. Learn more. You may unsubscribe any time.