Senate Republicans now favor taxing the rich. Wait, whaaat?

A group of Republican senators, including one who has until now not been a major voice in the debate over the chamber's efforts to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act, are proposing what amounts to heresy within the broader GOP: retaining tax increases on the wealthy that the ACA put in place, fund more access for the poor.

The idea they are floating is to continue with the plan to abolish the various taxes imposed when the ACA was put in place, except for one: a 3.8 percent surcharge on investment income that targets individuals with income over $200,000 and families with income over $250,000. Doing so would preserve revenues worth about $172 billion over the next ten years, creating room in the bill to scale back proposed reductions in federal Medicaid spending and perhaps to help reduce out-of-pocket health care spending for low-income Americans.

Related: Rand Paul's Health Care Wish List Could Be a Deal Breaker for the GOP

Maine Sen. Susan Collins has been one of the most visible opponents of the bill that Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell was forced to pull back from an expected floor vote this week. She has criticized it for its treatment of Planned Parenthood as well as cuts that she says would reduce access to care for her disproportionately old and low-income constituency.

In an interview Wednesday, she told Bloomberg News that she couldn't justify eliminating that tax because it doesn't drive up the cost of health care. "So I distinguish between those tax increases that were part of Obamacare that increase premiums and the cost of health care versus those that do not."

Lawmakers, politicians react to Republicans pulling health care bill
See Gallery
Lawmakers, politicians react to Republicans pulling health care bill
Today was a victory for all Americans.
I want to thank @POTUS, @VP, @SecPriceMD, & @HouseGOP members. There remains so much we can do to help improve peop…
Today is a great victory but we have a lot more work to do. We are going to go forward and guarantee health care to…
My statement on the #AHCA
Ultimately the #Trumpcare bill failed because of two traits that have plagued the Trump presidency: incompetence & broken promises.
#TrumpCare was about spite. It was brought up because they loved the optics of a vote on ACA's 7th annv -- not because it was a good idea.
I applaud House conservatives for keeping their word to the American people. I look forward to passing full repeal
.@HouseGOP I hope this means you're finally ready to get serious and work with us to improve the Affordable Care Ac…
I remain wholeheartedly committed to keeping the promise I made to my NC-11 constituents--to fully repealing and re…
This is why we fight. When we get out there & fight, we can make a real difference.
Can't throw @POTUS under the bus. He is the BUS. My fellow republicans are figuring that out.
Hey Republicans, don't worry, that burn is covered under the Affordable Care Act
Art of the Squeal: I blame Democrats for a bill Republicans couldn't pass. I blame Obama. I blame Australian Prime…
.@realDonaldTrump, @SpeakerRyan: we're not tired of winning yet. Ready when you are to talk real solutions to fix A…
Here's my statement on the cancellation of the House vote on the American Health Care Act:

On Thursday morning, South Dakota Sen. Mike Rounds, who took office in 2015, expressed a similar view in an interview with National Public Radio.

"There are a number of taxes that are being repealed, appropriately so because they impact everybody and they're driving up the cost of healthcare," he said. "But there is one particular tax that was imposed by Obamacare that was on the incomes of individuals and families who earn more than $250,000 per year. If that particular one was not repealed, it would allow us about $172 billion of additional revenue coming in over this 10-year-period of time that could be used to make some improvements in the benefits under the bill."

Related: Why State Governors Are Freaking Out About the GOP Health Plan

Asked if he was speaking for a large number of senators, Rounds demurred, saying the legislators could speak for themselves individually. But he held out at least the possibility that the issue is on the table.

"I can tell you that both privately and as a general group, we have talked about this issue," he said. "There is no consensus yet -- it wouldn't be fair to call it that, but that's why we wanted more time."

Collins and Rounds aren't alone in signaling that the relentless criticism of the distributional effects of both the Senate plan and a related bill passed by the House of Representatives last month, both of which enormously benefit the very wealthiest Americans while reducing benefits for low-income and the middle class, is affecting GOP lawmakers' thinking.

Tennessee Sen. Bob Corker on Wednesday also spoke favorably about retaining the 3.8 percent tax on investment income.

Related: Here Are Five Reasons Why the GOP's Health Bill is Doomed

He said he was uncomfortable with the Senate bill because it took a step "backward" in terms of making health care affordable for low-income Americans. "It's something that's important to me that lower-income citizens have the ability to actually purchase plans that give them healthcare or insure them, and I know there are other members that have expressed the same," he told reporters following a meeting with McConnell.

"At the same time, the 3.8 percent tax on the wealthy was being done away with. That's not an equilibrium that to me is appropriate," he said. "That's not a trade-off that's appropriate. That's not an equation that is appropriate."

Even Republicans who have been opposed to the bill from the right, arguing that it is not conservative enough, are starting to get uncomfortable with the optics of a massive tax deduction for wealthy families that translates into little benefit for everyone else.

Utah Sen. Mike Lee complained this week that the Senate bill "included hundreds of billions of dollars in tax cuts for the affluent, bailouts for insurance companies and subsidies for lower-income Americans."

Related: Senate Health Bill Would Drive Coverage Down by 22 Million: CBO

It's important to note that even if there is significant support for keeping the 3.8 percent investment income tax, adding that change is no guarantee that the bill will pass. There is considerable opposition to the bill on the far right of the GOP, where elimination of ACA-related tax cuts is practically a sacred obligation. Adding back $172 billion in tax revenue could easily push just as many Republican votes away from the bill as it adds.

Because Senate Democrats are united in opposition to the bill, Republicans' slim majority gives them little room for error, even though the bill is expected to be passed in an expedited budget reconciliation process that protects it from the filibuster.

If McConnell loses more than two of his 52 votes, the bill cannot pass, and right now the math doesn't look good.

Top Reads from The Fiscal Times

Should I Include a Dependent's Income on My Tax Return?

It may be easier and less expensive to include dependents' income on your tax return rather than have them file their own return—in certain circumstances.

Read More

Brought to you by

Great Ways to Get Charitable Tax Deductions

Generally, when you give money to a charity, you can use the amount of that donation as an itemized deduction on your tax return. However, not all charities qualify as tax-deductible organizations. While there are many types of charities, they must all meet certain criteria to be classified by the IRS as tax-deductible organizations. There are legitimate tax-deductible organizations in many popular categories, such as those listed below.

Read More

Brought to you by

Tax Tips After January 1, 2019

TurboTax gives you ten tax saving tips for the new year. Find strategies to lower taxes, save money when preparing your tax return, and avoid tax penalties.

Read More

Brought to you by

Should You and Your Spouse File Taxes Jointly or Separately?

Married couples have the option to file jointly or separately on their federal income tax returns. The IRS strongly encourages most couples to file joint tax returns by extending several tax breaks to those who file together. In the vast majority of cases, it's best for married couples to file jointly, but there may be a few instances when it's better to submit separate returns.

Read More

Brought to you by
Read Full Story