The $5.7 billion 'pink slime' lawsuit against ABC was just settled, leaving beef company feeling 'vindicated'

ABC News and Beef Products Inc. reached a settlement in a $5.7 billion lawsuit that claimed a story ABC ran in 2012 misled viewers and caused hundreds of layoffs.

On Wednesday, ABC announced it had reached an "amicable resolution" with BPI. The terms of the settlement are confidential, the Sioux City Journal reported.

BPI's attorney, Dan Webb, said that the settlement "vindicates" the company and its production of "lean finely textured beef," the product that ABC dubbed "pink slime" in its 2012 reports, Sioux City Journal's Nick Hytrek reported.

"Although we have concluded that continued litigation of this case is not in the Company's interests, we remain committed to the vigorous pursuit of truth and the consumer's right to know about the products they purchase," ABC said in a statement.

13 PHOTOS
'Pink Slime' trial pits ABC against South Dakota meat processor
See Gallery
'Pink Slime' trial pits ABC against South Dakota meat processor

The welcome sign is seen for the town of Elk Point, South Dakota, U.S. June 3, 2017.

(REUTERS/Ryan Henriksen)

A drive-through food truck, which is one of the few options for food along Main Street, is seen in Elk Point, South Dakota, U.S. June 3, 2017. 

(REUTERS/Ryan Henriksen)

A grain elevator is seen just behind the Union County Courthouse in Elk Point, South Dakota, U.S. June 3, 2017. 

(REUTERS/Ryan Henriksen)

A view shows Main Street in Elk Point, South Dakota, U.S. June 3, 2017. 

(REUTERS/Ryan Henriksen)

The Union County Courthouse on Main Street, where the defamation lawsuit of South Dakota meat processor Beef Products Inc. against ABC Broadcasting will be heard, is seen in Elk Point, South Dakota, U.S., June 3, 2017. 

(REUTERS/Ryan Henriksen)

A reflection is seen along Main Street after a passing storm in Elk Point, South Dakota, U.S. June 3, 2017. 

(REUTERS/Ryan Henriksen)

The water tower is seen along Main Street in Elk Point, South Dakota, U.S. June 3, 2017. 

(REUTERS/Ryan Henriksen)

The Union County Courthouse on Main Street, where the defamation lawsuit of South Dakota meat processor Beef Products Inc. against ABC Broadcasting will be heard, is seen at Elk Point, South Dakota, U.S., June 3, 2017.

(REUTERS/Ryan Henriksen)

The Union County Courthouse on Main Street, where the defamation lawsuit of South Dakota meat processor Beef Products Inc. against ABC Broadcasting will be heard, is seen at Elk Point, South Dakota, U.S., June 3, 2017. 

(REUTERS/Ryan Henriksen)

The BPI v. ABC trial schedule posted on the door of the Union County Courthouse, where the defamation lawsuit of South Dakota meat processor Beef Products Inc. against ABC Broadcasting will be heard, is seen in Elk Point, South Dakota, U.S., June 3, 2017. 

(REUTERS/Ryan Henriksen)

Modular buildings that have been placed in town to support the legal staff that will arrive in Elk Point, South Dakota, U.S. are seen on June 3, 2017. The defamation lawsuit of South Dakota meat processor Beef Products Inc. against ABC Broadcasting is set to begin on Monday, June 5, 2017. 

(REUTERS/Ryan Henriksen)

The Union County Courthouse on Main Street, where the defamation lawsuit of South Dakota meat processor Beef Products Inc. against ABC Broadcasting will be heard, is seen at Elk Point, South Dakota, U.S., June 3, 2017.

(REUTERS/Ryan Henriksen)

HIDE CAPTION
SHOW CAPTION
of
SEE ALL
BACK TO SLIDE

The news comes less than a month after lawyers made their opening statements in a trial that could have resulted in a verdict of as much as $5.7 billion if BPI had won.

In the suit, BPI alleged that ABC misled viewers by calling "lean finely textured beef" (LFTB) "pink slime." LFTB is a commonly used ingredient in beef products and is safe to eat, which ABC noted in its report. However, even with assurances that the ingredient, which is made from the trimmings of a cow and treated with ammonia to kill bacteria, wasn't dangerous, the phrase "pink slime" allegedly turned off customers.

"They ignored the proper name," BPI's lawyer, Dan Webb, said in his opening argument, according to the Hollywood Reporter. "When you have a major news organization that is calling the product 'slime,' witnesses will say they can't imagine anything worse. It connotes something disgusting, inedible."

BPI said it had to close three plants and lay off 700 workers due to "pink slime" backlash.

Meanwhile, ABC's attorney argued that the "pink slime" reports brought light to the fact that BPI and other ground beef producers had been using an mostly-unknown beef product that most shoppers and customers were unaware they were eating.

NOW WATCH: 9 items you shouldn't buy at Costco

See Also:

SEE ALSO: Darden shares hit all-time high after CEO says millennials are not actually killing chains like Olive Garden

Read Full Story

Can't get enough business news?

Sign up for Finance Report by AOL and get everything from retailer news to the latest IPOs delivered directly to your inbox daily!

Subscribe to our other newsletters

Emails may offer personalized content or ads. Learn more. You may unsubscribe any time.