Why Darden Kept Olive Garden and Dumped Red Lobster

Darden Restaurants has been running a victory lap with investors, bragging about how it just dumped the Red Lobster business for a cool $2 billion despite the fact that the chain is shedding customers and profits. But the same could well be said for Olive Garden, and yet Darden is determined to try to turn that restaurant around. 

Olive Garden suffered a 6% decline in customer traffic in March. Source: Darden Restaurants.

In the video below, Fool contributor Demitrios Kalogeropoulos discusses a few reasons Darden has a better shot at reviving Olive Garden than it did with Red Lobster. For one, food costs trends are much kinder on the Italian restaurant chain, given that seafood prices are climbing while bread and pasta costs are shrinking. Darden's management can also engineer an easy win by remodeling the Olive Garden locations that badly need a facelift, which will bring sales growth levels for that group back in line with the rest of the chain. And finally, while Red Lobster tends to attract a narrow demographic of diners, Olive Garden is more popular with exactly the demographic showing the most growth in the casual-dining sector. Watch the video below for Demitrios' full take.

This coming device has every company salivatingThe best investors consistently reap gigantic profits by recognizing true potential earlier and more accurately than anyone else. Let me cut right to the chase. There is a product in development that will revolutionize not just how we buy goods, but potentially how we interact with the companies we love on a daily basis. Analysts are already licking their chops at the sales potential. In order to outsmart Wall Street and realize multi-bagger returns, you will need The Motley Fool's new free report on the dream-team responsible for this game-changing blockbuster. CLICK HERE NOW.

The article Why Darden Kept Olive Garden and Dumped Red Lobster originally appeared on Fool.com.

Demitrios Kalogeropoulos has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Copyright © 1995 - 2014 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Read Full Story