How Shareholders Could Force Chipotle to Lower Co-CEOs' Pay
Chipotle's annual meeting looks set to court controversy over excessive pay. The California State Teachers' Retirement System (CalSTRS), the Florida State Board of Administration, and the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) Pension Plan have all disclosed that they will vote against executive pay at the annual meeting on May 15.
Companies are required each year to propose a resolution, known as Say on Pay, to seek shareholder approval of the way the CEO and other executives are paid.
Not only that, but both major proxy advisory firms - Institutional Shareholder Services and Glass Lewis, who advise large shareholders on how they should vote - have also recommended that their clients oppose executive pay at the company. As I wrote earlier, another shareholder group, CtW, had already written to the SEC complaining about pay at the company.
Pay not linked to performance
Normally companies come under fire for excessive pay because they are performing badly. And indeed, all of the shareholders and advisory firms criticize Chipotle for what they call a pay-performance disconnect, as well as excessive use of equity.
But Chipotle's performance has not been poor. Over the last five years, the shares have risen from around $80 to over $600, before dropping back to just over $500 today.
However, Chipotle employs two co-CEOs, founder Steve Ells and Montgomery Moran, so even if they weren't paid excessively, they would still cost twice as much as a normal CEO.
In 2013, the two earned a combined $93 million, including large stock option profits and around $20 million each in performance shares. And despite being founders of the company who already own just over 1% of outstanding shares each, the compensation committee awards them stock option and other equity grants annually at considerable cost to shareholders.
The shareholders are additionally opposing a request by the company to increase the number of shares it can award executives, because of costs. In contrast, at many companies, such as Microsoft , founders do not receive any equity awards at all because they are already effectively aligned with shareholders.
While institutional shareholders get irate about the pay-performance disconnect, retail shareholders can get even more angry about excessive perks. There are plenty here. As I wrote earlier, for some reason the company is paying for schooling for CEO Moran's children. In addition, the company pays income taxes on perks for all executives, including the two CEOs. Three executives receive special housing expenses, and CFO Jack Hartnung, despite being with the company 12 years, receives commuting expenses between his "home" and company headquarters.
Chipotle has already experienced significant disapproval of its Say on Pay proposal in previous years. With this level of opposition announced before the annual meeting, the outcome of the vote may be a foregone conclusion.
How to get even more income during retirement
Social Security plays a key role in your financial security, but it's not the only way to boost your retirement income. In our brand-new free report, our retirement experts give their insight on a simple strategy to take advantage of a little-known IRS rule that can help ensure a more comfortable retirement for you and your family. Click here to get your copy today.
The article How Shareholders Could Force Chipotle to Lower Co-CEOs' Pay originally appeared on Fool.com.Paul Hodgson has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends Chipotle Mexican Grill. The Motley Fool owns shares of Chipotle Mexican Grill and Microsoft. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Copyright © 1995 - 2014 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.