Intel's Mobile Group Loses Over $3 Billion in 2013
For the longest time, it wasn't quite clear just how much Intel's mobile group was losing. Indeed, since the mobile group's results were part of the "Other Intel Architecture" group for the past several years, it was hard to separate that division from the more profitable "intelligent systems" group. Intel has now reorganized its reporting to give investors more clarity on what exactly is going on.
During 2013, Intel's Mobile and Communications group generated $1.375 billion in revenue. On that revenue base, Intel lost $3.15 billion. Now, without knowing the gross margin profile of that division, it's hard to get a handle on the operating expenses. That being said, if we assume that the division (which mostly consists of low-end 2G/3G modems and a handful of apps processors) does gross margins in the 40% range, then this would suggest operating expenses of about $3.7 billion.
For Intel to break even -- assuming that operating expenses stay roughly flat -- at about the 50% gross margin level, the company would need to do about $7.4 billion annually. Now, do keep in mind that this represents a pretty serious chunk of the mobile market (modems, connectivity, and apps processors), so it'll take quite a bit to get to breakeven, let alone profitability.
According to Strategy Analytics, the smartphone apps processor market is set to be worth a whopping $30 billion by 2018. The tablet processor market should be worth a cool $7.2 billion by 2018, again according to Strategy Analytics. If Intel can capture 35% of the tablet apps processor market and about 25% of the smartphone apps processor markets, that works out to over $10 billion in sales for the company -- not even including discrete cellular modems.
That may seem aggressive, but given the trajectory Intel is on with both its tablet and smartphone offerings, getting this kind of share in tablet/phone apps processors actually seems quite reasonable. This is a long-term game, however, and investors shouldn't expect wild profitability over the next few years (although the massive losses should come down nicely over the next couple of years).
Many will rightly note that Intel's mobile group losses are so wide that they wipe out over half of the operating profit of the company's datacenter business. However, focusing on short-term profits and ignoring the long-term strategic goals is the key to failure. Intel knows it needs to be a big player in both smartphones and tablets; otherwise it risks irrelevance. Intel is spending what it needs to in order to win, and long-term investors should understand that these "big losses" are a necessary move.
Indeed, with mobile-chip giant Qualcomm investing probably at over $3 billion a year and given its first-mover advantage, it's neither easy nor cheap to catch up with such a behemoth. Qualcomm's mobile IP is best-in-class from the CPU to the modem, and developing all of that and building upon it requires a large investment. But if Intel's investments are successful, there will be a great long-term payoff.
While you wait for Intel to catch up in mobile, this stock could explode
If you thought the iPod, the iPhone, and the iPad were amazing, just wait until you see this. One hundred of Apple's top engineers are busy building one in a secret lab. And an ABI Research report predicts 485 million of them could be sold over the next decade. But you can invest in it right now, for just a fraction of the price of Apple stock. Click here to get the full story in this eye-opening new report.
The article Intel's Mobile Group Loses Over $3 Billion in 2013 originally appeared on Fool.com.Ashraf Eassa owns shares of Intel. The Motley Fool recommends Apple and Intel and owns shares of Apple, Intel, and Qualcomm. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Copyright © 1995 - 2014 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.