The Hidden Financial Risk of Buying a Home in a New Development

Buying a house in a new subdivision can be exciting. You're often the first person to live in your home, and it likely will have many of the latest features and amenities. But there's a danger too -- one I know only too well.

In 2009, my wife and I bought a new home in a new neighborhood. Today, with the developer still building more houses in the subdivision, we're finding that we can't easily sell it -- at least, not without losing $20,000 or more in equity.

We've learned the hard way that it's incredibly tough to compete with the developer who built your house, especially when the firm is still building more models nearby.

Here are a few things that you should consider before you make such a purchase.

Homes Are Still Being Built

In my neighborhood, the same builder who sold to us is developing all 80 of the remaining available lots. So why would anyone purchase my home when he or she could buy a brand new one? What do I have to offer that the builder does not? Two new homes for sale have identical floor plans to mine.

This means I'll have to lower my price considerably to attract potential buyers. Beyond that, I'll likely have to pay closing costs, upgrade amenities, offer a home warranty, or agree to some combination of these things to entice a buyer to purchase a 5-year-old home instead of a new one.

I could try to lure buyers with upgrades like granite countertops or incredible landscaping, but there is also a danger in having the most expensive house in the neighborhood. It's often impossible to recoup your costs for those types of upgrades in today's real estate market. I'd have to take a loss on most of them. So, even if I sold the home for close the price I bought it for, I'd still be losing money.

Do You Even Have the Right to Sell?

You may be shocked to learn that, even though you own it, you might not have the legal right to sell your home in a new subdivision for several years. Many homebuilders are adding clauses to contracts that force you to wait -- similar to an employer's non-compete clause

"The first thing a seller needs to do is check any contract terms they had with the builder -- many have a clause prohibiting sale during a certain period except in hardship cases," says Katie Wethman, a licensed Realtor with the Wethman Group in McLean, Va.

Always consider when you could potentially need or want to sell the home you're buying -- preferably before you're in the lawyer's office closing on the purchase. It's almost like playing chess. You've got to think a few moves ahead and ensure that there aren't clauses in your purchase contract that will prevent you from selling when you want. For that matter, it's worth looking for other hidden issues as well. Don't just sign a boilerplate contract without understanding what it means to you.

Comparison Shopping: Not So Simple

A new neighborhood is in many ways a closed environment. It'll be hard to get accurate sales comparison data because there has been so little turnover yet.

Of course, you and your real estate broker can (and will) try to compare similar homes in other neighborhoods. But comparable home sales in your neighborhood are the best indicator of what you can expect your home to resell for. You may have to wait years before you start to see some resales in your new neighborhood and learn what similar houses to yours go for on the open market.

Can You Beat the Builder at His Own Game?

Everyone trying to sell a home must strive to display it in the best possible light, but that is doubly true when you are selling a home in a new subdivision. You'll have to showcase any upgrades you have made. You must have perfect landscaping. You'll need to accentuate any way that your home stands out from the builders' new homes on the market. And you should probably spend the money to stage your home.

%VIRTUAL-article-sponsoredlinks%"A seller in this situation needs to spend extra time making sure the house is in pristine condition. Even normal wear and tear on a house is going to make it seem 'dirty' compared to a new construction home," says Wethman.

Sellers of pre-existing homes may be able to make their homes feel warmer if they choose the right colors and have it appropriately staged. A builder may have to show a less-inviting model home, or even one not quite finished.

If a buyer could move into your home quickly, with a very short escrow period, highlight that. Many builders need time to get new homes ready for people to move in.

Beware of the Fire Sale as Homebuilders Finish

You will have an especially tough job of selling if you're trying to do so at the same time as your homebuilder starts slashing prices to finish the subdivision and move on to the next project.

"Upon starting a subdivision, [developers] have to place hundreds of thousands of dollars or more in escrow with the governing body. This ensures completion of everything from final grades of roads to planned trees and parks," says Jerry Grodesky, managing broker at Farm and Lake Houses Real Estate in southern Illinois. "It is no surprise when they discount the remaining lots or homes in a 'fire sale,' which undermines the established pricing structure of the neighborhood," he says.

The builder receives a large financial windfall when the government returns escrow money -- yet another reason why a company may slash prices on the last few homes in a new neighborhood to finish. Cutting prices ultimately hurts existing home values and comparable sales figures.

Websites like Zillow (Z) and Trulia (TRLA), by the way, can provide you with a wealth of knowledge on home pricing trends and comparable sales figures. But that works both ways. Buyers typically conduct a lot of research before purchasing, and bargain for the best possible price. It's still a buyers' market in America, and this often adds to the nightmare for sellers in a new subdivision.

My wife and I have decided to wait to sell our home, in the hopes that prices will increase over the next few years, and that the developer will finish the neighborhood. In the meantime, since we had to move away for new jobs, we've become accidental landlords. We're losing $300 month renting out our home, but that's better than losing a lot more by selling at the wrong time.

Have you ever tried to sell a home in a new subdivision? What have been some of your struggles? Was it worse than selling a home in a built up, established neighborhood? Hank Coleman is a financial planner and the publisher of the popular personal finance blog Money Q&A, where he answers readers' tough money questions. Follow him on Twitter @MoneyQandA.

More from Hank Coleman

10 Weird Ways States Tax You (and Don't)
See Gallery
The Hidden Financial Risk of Buying a Home in a New Development
The Aloha State legislature, in an effort to preserve the uniqueness of their island paradise, has an "Exceptional Tree" tax allowance. Landowners can deduct up to $3,000 from their income for expenses such as pruning and fertilization for any tree designated as rare, big, old or a combination thereof. That's per tree. Top-bracket earners taxed at the state's highest rate (11 percent) would save $330 via the deduction.

The work must be done by a certified arborist, and the deduction can be claimed only every third year. The deduction was enacted in 2004. Hawaii has had a list of "Exceptional Trees" since 1975, and there are now estimated to be more than a thousand thus designated.
Maine legislators, a flinty bunch, don't see the harm in taxing anyone who deals in their official state fruit -- blueberries, at the rate of 1.5 cents per pound. The resulting revenues -- more than $1.6 million to state coffers in the fiscal year that ended in June 2013 -- are used to promote the crop and agricultural research.

The state also taxes harvesters and processors of hard-shell clams (known in the state as mahogany quahogs) at $1.25 a bushel, but state revenues for that are much lower. The taxes are levied at the wholesale level, but naturally, they end up being passed on to the consumer.
The Yellow Hammer State is the last in the union to tax a deck of cards as if it were a "vice," like alcohol and tobacco.

Taxing decks of cards, associated with gambling, was once fairly common, but most states have since set up separate control boards to regulate liquor and tobacco, and have let the cards slide.

But in Alabama, you'll still pay a 10 cent sales tax on any pack of cards you purchase. Retailers also have to pay $2 to the state each year for the privilege of selling playing cards.
"Merlyners" love their pollution-beleaguered Chesapeake Bay, the largest marine estuary in the U.S. In 2013, in part to meet federal pollution-control mandates, Free State legislators enacted fees on property owners in Baltimore and nine other Maryland counties, aimed at curbing storm water runoff. The fees were meant to fund programs to improve the water quality of the Bay.

Sounds simple enough, but the way Maryland legislators wrote the law has led to an angry backlash in some corners against this so-called "Rain Tax."

One way localities can calculate the tax is by measuring how much of a landowner's tract is "impervious" to precipitation seeping into the ground. So the more you've developed it with buildings, driveways, tennis courts and the like, the less it will absorb and the more you pay. That's how the tax is being implemented (through aerial and satellite photos) in Montgomery County, Md., a heavily developed suburb of Washington, D.C., and landowners are up in arms.

Other counties have rebelled, opting to pay for the pollution control programs out of general funds rather than pass the cost onto landowners. Maryland’s Republican candidate for governor, David Craig, has made the law's repeal part of his platform for the 2014 election.
The Sunflower State is among a bevy of jurisdictions that allows sale of lower-alcohol beer (the term of art is "cereal malt beverage") in convenience and grocery stores.

But Kansas also taxes "3.2" beer differently—and there lies the rub. At a liquor store, all products, including, say, a conventional six-pack of Budweiser (with 5 percent alcohol by volume), are taxed at a special rate of 8 percent. At the convenience store down the street, however, ordinary sales tax is levied on the lower-alcohol, cereal malt beverage bottle of Bud. That often ends up being more than the 8 percent alcohol tax. In Pomona, Kans., for example, the effective rate on the weaker beer would be 9.7 percent. Go figure.
When it comes to taxation, the rule is generally the stronger the booze, the higher the tax (that's why Kansas's beer tax scheme is an anomaly). California follows that curve, but at 100 proof, you better be ready to pay through the nose.

Distilled spirits are taxed at $3.30 a gallon if below 100 proof, or 50 percent alcohol. Go over that, like with Bacardi 151, and the tax doubles to $6.60. Maryland also notes the 100 proof point, but it only adds 1.5 cents per proof, per gallon to the relatively modest liquor tax of $1.50 per gallon, taking the Bacardi 151 to $2.27 per gallon.
Entertainment venues pay a business tax to the Silver State ranging from 5  to 10 percent on admissions fees (and food, drink and merchandise sales) whenever there’s live entertainment going on.

There are exemptions, however, including this one, for businesses that provide " ... Instrumental or vocal music, which may or may not be supplemented with commentary by the musicians, in a restaurant, lounge or similar area if such music does not routinely rise to the volume that interferes with casual conversation and if such music would not generally cause patrons to watch as well as listen."

So your piano player can play "Feelings" softly and even crack a few jokes, tax-free, for your business. Just make sure they're not funny enough to attract attention.
Want to own a plush or fuel-thirsty ride? That’ll cost you extra in the Garden State.

Cars that cost $45,000 or more or have a combined EPA fuel-mileage average of 19 or below pay an additional 0.4 percent on top of New Jersey’s 7 percent sales tax.
Businesses in D.C. that sell food or alcohol are required to charge customers 5 cents for every paper or plastic disposable bag they take. The store gets to keep a penny, and the balance goes to a government fund dedicated to cleaning up the Anacostia River.

Consumers and storekeepers grumbled at the program's debut in 2010. It has raised about $7 million so far, below expectations, but the program’s designers see this as a positive sign -- that shoppers have opted to bring their own reusable bags.
Read Full Story
  • DJI25886.01306.611.20%
  • NIKKEI 22520418.8113.110.06%
    Hang Seng25734.22238.720.94%
  • USD (PER EUR)1.110.00000.00%
    USD (PER CHF)1.02-0.0008-0.08%
    JPY (PER USD)106.440.08000.08%
    GBP (PER USD)1.21-0.0000-0.00%