Men's Wearhouse Turns Tables with Bid for Jos. A. Bank

Men's Wearhouse turns tables with bid for Jos. A. Bank
Mati Milstein/Bloomberg via Getty Images
By Aditi Shrivastava

Men's Wearhouse struck back at Jos. A. Bank Clothiers with a $1.5 billion bid to acquire the suit and tuxedo retailer, only weeks after rejecting a takeover offer from its smaller rival.

Men's Wearhouse (MW), under pressure from activist shareholders to merge, offered $55 a share in cash for Jos. A. Bank, an unusual counter-offer that values the smaller retailer's stock at a 9 percent premium to its close Monday.

Jos. A. Bank's (JOSB) shares rose as much as 12 percent Tuesday to a 2½-year high of $56.91, topping the offer in a sign investors might be expecting a higher bid. Men's Wearhouse shares rose as much as 10 percent to a year-high.

"For the shareholders of Men's Warehouse and for Joseph A. Bank, Christmas has come early. They will see huge benefits to the merging of these two companies," said Jerry Reisman, an M&A expert at law firm Reisman Peirez Reisman & Capobianco.

The combined company would have 1,700 stores that hire tuxedos and sell suits, a scale that has in the past raised antitrust questions about a merger.

The retaliatory offer from Men's Wearhouse, %VIRTUAL-article-sponsoredlinks%which the company says implies an enterprise value of about $1.2 billion for Jos. A. Bank, follows pressure from its largest shareholder, New York-based hedge fund Eminence Capital.

Eminence, along with other hedge funds that hold about 30 percent of Men's Wearhouse shares, had tried to persuade other investors to pressure the company into accepting the takeover offer from Jos. A. Bank.

"We are pleased to see that the board of Men's Wearhouse agrees with us and recognizes the substantial benefits of merging with Jos. A. Bank," said Eminence Capital CEO Ricky Sandler.

The last person to push Men's Wearhouse to sell itself was its founder, George Zimmer, known to U.S. television audiences for his advertising catch phrase, "You're gonna like the way you look -- I guarantee it."

Zimmer was ousted by the board in June after arguing for a sale of the company to an investment group. At the time, he accused the board of trying to silence him for expressing concerns about the direction of the company he founded 40 years ago.

Men's Wearhouse is serious about acquiring Jos. A. Bank and isn't simply trying to force the company to raise its bid for Men's Wearhouse, according to sources familiar with the process.

"Viewed in the most favorable light, by making this offer, Men's Wearhouse is agreeing with Jos. A. Bank that combining the companies makes sense, but is trying to capture the upside for its own shareholders rather than giving it to Jos. A. Bank's shareholders," said Spencer Klein, co-head of mergers and acquisitions at law firm Morrison & Foerster.

"Viewed in a more unfavorable light, it can be perceived as another in a line of defensive moves designed to keep the existing board and management of Men's Wearhouse entrenched in place," Klein said.

Jos. A. Bank confirmed that it had received the acquisition proposal and said it was evaluating it with its advisers. As of Aug. 3, the company had cash and cash equivalents of about $333.2 million and no long-term debt.

Pac-Man Defense

The unusual tactic of a target firm turning around to try and buy a previous suitor is known as a Pac-Man defense, named after a 1980s video game where Pac-Man turns on the ghosts trying to kill him.

Other situations in which the Pac-Man defense was used include French oil company TotalFina's $43 billion bid for rival Elf Aquitaine, which countered with a $50 billion offer in 1999, and the takeover battle between aerospace companies Bendix and Martin Marietta in 1982.

Men's Wearhouse swiftly rebuffed Jos. A. Bank's offer in October to buy it for $2.3 billion, or $48 a share. Jos. A. Bank walked away from the bid on Nov. 15, although it didn't rule out another bid.

In a statement Tuesday, Men's Wearhouse said it had the "advantage in scale, growth and performance" to combine the two chains.

"We believe we are the right acquirer for this combination and that our experienced management team is best positioned to execute the integration of our companies," said Bill Sechrest, lead director of the board of Men's Wearhouse.

Men's Wearhouse, based in Fremont, Calif., operates more than 1,100 stores under the Men's Wearhouse, Moores and K&G banners.

Jos. A. Bank, a century-old seller of men's tailored and casual clothing, has more than 600 stores in the United States.

"Men's Wearhouse's leadership was not only personally offended by the efforts of Jos A. Bank to try to take them over, but they see this as an opportunity to strengthen their business by eliminating the competition," Reisman said.

After rejecting the October offer, Men's Wearhouse also adopted a poison pill to prevent a hostile takeover. It also said at the time that a combination of the two companies raised antitrust issues.

Jos. A. Bank shares were up 11 percent to $56.21 in afternoon trading on the Nasdaq, while Men's Wearhouse shares were up more than 9 percent to $51.58 on the New York Stock Exchange.

-Additional reporting by Olivia Oran and Nadia Damouni; writing by Robin Paxton.

11 Stocks Warren Buffett Owns That You Should Buy Now, Too
See Gallery
Men's Wearhouse Turns Tables with Bid for Jos. A. Bank
(DE) trades at close to $86, and the $97.89 consensus price target implies upside of almost 14%. Deere comes with a 2.3% dividend yield. The 4 million shares in Buffett's war chest are worth about $344 million, but will be worth almost $400 million or so if you include the dividends in a year, if Wall Street is right. Buffett might agree with the most optimistic analyst target out there of $120 per share, since this machinery giant trades at only about 10 times earnings.
GM (GM) is still a fairly new position for Team Buffett. Buffett probably thought he would get an index-related bounce, and his 25 million share are worth about $850 million. GM's stock has risen to more than $34, which still leaves more than 15% upside to the consensus price target of $39.53. Buffett likely foresees years of auto sales growth ahead, and GM's forward earnings multiple of 10 times earnings is just a tad cheaper than the dividend-paying Ford Motor (F) at almost 11 times earnings. The highest analyst target out there is actually above $50, although we would caution that GM pays no dividend.
J.P. Morgan (JPM) is a personal stock holding of Buffett, even though Wells Fargo & Co. (WFC) keeps becoming a larger and larger stake for Berkshire Hathaway every quarter. We are not sure how much money Buffett has put into J.P. Morgan himself because it has not been disclosed. With shares just under $53, the implied upside is close to 8% here, and that was the most upside in the Buffett banking and financial giants. Buffett himself likely agrees more with the highest consensus target of $66, since this top bank trades at less than 10 times earnings and yields almost 3%.
Coke (KO) has retreated to under $41 from $43 in this latest market pullback, but the implied upside to the $46.20 price target is now about 13.5%. Buffett has been a long-term holder here, and his position is worth close to $16 billion. The top analyst target is $50 and the dividend yield is about 2.8%. Buffett has had a stake in Coca-Cola so long that he likely couldn't care less that a beverage stock trades at about 19 times expected earnings.
IBM (IBM) is still somewhat new to the Buffett portfolio, and it's a larger position, worth close to $14 billion, for more than 68 million shares. The $203 share price implies almost 10% upside to the $222 price target. IBM keeps buying back stock at a rapid pace but only pays a 1.8% dividend yield. It trades at about 12 times earnings, and the highest price target from the analyst community is $250.
Berkshire Hathaway's position in National Oilwell Varco (NOV) has grown to almost 7.5 million shares, with a current market value of more than $500 million. It trades at about $69.25, and that implies about 19% upside to the $82.58 consensus price target. The dividend yield here is lower than most Buffett stocks at only about 1.5%, but its valuation in the oil infrastructure market is not excessive at about 12 times expected earnings. Buffett's new portfolio managers probably think that the highest analyst price target of about $93 is closer to the truth, considering its dominance oil and gas infrastructure.
Buffett's stake in Precision Castparts (PCP) is worth about $420 million, but the $211 share price implies upside of about 13.5% to the consensus $239.60 price target. Its dividend is too small to matter, although it was hard to not notice the street-high price target of $280 for the metal components and products player.
Berkshire has a lot riding on it's stake in Procter & Gamble (PG), which is valued at about $4 billion, although this is a lower stake than it had been in the past. Now that shares have pulled back to about $76.85, the implied upside that remains here is just over 10% to the consensus target of $84.78. Buffett likely agrees with the activists that the CEO change may help, and Buffett probably would think that the street-high target price of $95 is perhaps better for the long-term, as the consumer products giant recently tried to break out to higher prices. Buffett might also say that he is happy to get that 3.1% dividend yield while he waits. He might agree that 19 times earnings is too much in general to own a consumer products stock, but he has said over and over again that he'll pay up for quality.
Berkshire Hathaway's stake in Phillips 66 (PSX) was added to after the Conoco spin-off, its 27.16 million shares are worth more than $1.7 billion. The $63.75 share price implies upside of more than 13% to the $72.15 share price. Buffett went out of the way to talk up this holding in 2012, and the dividend is about 1.9%. This refiner and marketer trades at only eight times earnings, and the street-high target price is $85.
Berkshire has a rather small position in Verisk Analytics (VRSK) --  less than $100 million, making it one of the new portfolio manager's positions. Now that shares are down around $58, this implies about 12% upside to the $65.18 consensus price target. This analytics outfit for financial, insurance and health care decision-making does not pay a dividend, but the highest analyst target is up at $71 here.

(USG) is a strange position for Berkshire because the equity value of the stake of more than $400 million is undercounted to the actual control that the company has here. The $24.25 share price has corrected from more than $30, but that means there's a 27% implied upside to the $30.82 consensus price target. The common stock pays no dividend, but there is over 50% implied upside to the street-high $39 price target. The home builder products company still trades at a very high multiple of about 40 times earnings, but this has been a stake for years and years, while shares have been both much higher and much lower.


Some of the stocks from the Buffett portfolio have quite a lot of implied upside, and other upside winners are only about at-market upside risks. Stocks have pulled back in recent days and volatility has returned with a vengeance.
Read Full Story