Microsoft, Motorola Head to Court Again Over Patents

Steve Ballmer, CEO of Microsoft, discusses Nokia's newest smartphone, the Lumia 920, equipped with Microsoft's Windows Phone 8, Wednesday, Sept. 5, 2012 in New York. Nokia revealed its first smartphones to run the next version of Windows Wednesday, a big step for a company that has bet its future on an alliance with Microsoft. (AP Photo/Mark Lennihan)
Mark Lennihan/APMicrosoft CEO Steve Ballmer at last year's unveiling of the Nokia 920 smartphone.
By Bill Rigby and Dan Levine

SEATTLE -- Microsoft takes on Google's Motorola Mobility unit this week in the second of two landmark trials between the companies that delve into hot disputes over the patents behind smartphone and Internet technology.

The jury trial, starting Monday in federal court in Seattle, is set to resolve whether Motorola breached its contract with Microsoft to license on reasonable terms its so-called standard essential patents, covering wireless and video technology used in the Xbox game console.

The proceeding comes days after Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer unexpectedly announced his retirement. It also follows a complex trial last November that decided what the appropriate fee for Microsoft's use of Motorola-patented technology should be.
Sponsored Links

After five months of deliberation, U.S. District Judge James Robart came down heavily in Microsoft's favor, saying it owed only a fraction of the royalties Motorola had claimed, suggesting the appropriate rate was about $1.8 million, above Microsoft's estimate of $1 million, but well below Motorola's demand for as much as $4 billion a year.

Motorola cannot appeal Robart's April ruling until after the jury decides the second phase of the case.

In a court filing, Microsoft said it had offered to pay Motorola $6.8 million in past royalties, based on its application of Robart's order. However, Motorola rejected the money, the filing said.

In the forthcoming trial, starting with jury selection on Monday, Microsoft will argue that Motorola's initial demand was exorbitant and a clear breach of its agreement to charge reasonable and non-discriminatory terms -- commonly referred to as "RAND" -- for technology that is an industry standard.

Microsoft (MSFT) and Google (GOOG) declined comment on the trial.

After the result of the first trial, Motorola may have an uphill task in persuading a jury that it did not breach its contract. But Microsoft might not be able to recover huge damages, either.

"I think the interesting question is, assuming the court finds that Motorola breached its obligation to offer a RAND license, what is the remedy?" said Mark Lemley, a Stanford Law School professor who has been following the litigation. "No court has addressed that issue before."

In its quest for damages, Microsoft will introduce evidence about how much it had to spend to relocate a facility in Germany as a result of an injunction that Motorola won in Europe, according to court filings. Robart later ordered Motorola not to enforce that injunction, and Microsoft claims it should be reimbursed.

Global Patent War

Microsoft will also seek legal fees resulting from the injunction fight.

The argument between Microsoft and Motorola -- and by extension Google, which now owns it -- is just one facet of a wide-ranging global patent war surrounding smartphone and Internet technology that has drawn in Apple (AAPL), Samsung Electronics, Nokia (NOK) and others.

At heart, the companies are arguing over who owns the technology and design features behind smartphones, which are now essentially small computers.

More particularly, Microsoft has been locked in a battle with Google to ensure that handset makers using Google's free Android phone operating system pay Microsoft a license fee. Most large handset makers, such as Samsung, LG and HTC, have agreed to pay Microsoft a royalty on Android handsets that Microsoft believes may infringe on its patents. Motorola, which was bought by Google last year for $12.5 billion, is the last big holdout.

Robart gave each side 16 hours of trial time to present their case to a jury.

The case in U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington is Microsoft Corp. vs. Motorola Inc., 10-cv-1823.

Tech's Highest-Paid CEOs
See Gallery
Microsoft, Motorola Head to Court Again Over Patents
Company: Oracle
Cash compensation: $5.5 million
Stock and options: $90.7 million
Total compensation 1-year change: 24%

Despite his $1 salary, Ellison is not only the highest paid tech CEO this year, but the highest paid of all CEOs.
Most of Ellison's pay comes from his stock grants. In June of 2011 he was given an option to purchase 7 million shares of Oracle (ORCL) common stock.
Company: Yahoo
Cash compensation: $1.6 million
Stock and options: $35 million
Total compensation 1-year change: N/A

Mayer left Google (GOOG) to join Yahoo (YHOO) as its CEO, president and a board member in July of 2012. Her base salary was set at $1 million with an annual bonus target set at $2 million a year.
Though she only took home $6 million last year, Mayer reached No. 2 on this list because she was also offered a one-time retention award when she was hired, consisting of stock grants that could total $30 million when they vest over the next five years.
Company: eBay
Cash compensation: $4 million
Stock and options: $25.7 million
Total compensation 1-year change: 81%

The 81% jump in in Donahoe's salary this year is largely due to a one-time award of about $14.9 million paid in stock. According to a regulatory filing, Donahoe got the grant because he led eBay (EBAY) "successfully through a difficult turnaround ... and positioned it well for additional growth."
Cash compensation: $3.2 million
Stock and options: $18.9 million
Total compensation 1-year change: 25%

Benioff's base salary has been set at $1 million for the past two years. He received a $1.3 million cash bonus last year and almost $19 million in (CRM) stock options and awards. He also received $650,000 to cover costs related to his personal security, which is "of paramount importance to the company," according to a regulatory filing.
Company: AT&T
Cash compensation: $8.4 million
Stock and options: $12.6 million
Total compensation 1-year change: 12%

Stephenson, who has served as CEO and president of AT&T (T) since 2007, was paid a $6 million bonus on top of his $1.6 million base salary in 2012. About $13 million of his pay came in the form of stock and awards.
Company: Qualcomm
Cash compensation: $5.7 million
Stock and options: $15 million
Total compensation 1-year change: -5%

Jacobs was given a $3.4 million cash bonus on top of his $1.2 million salary. Other compensation for the CEO included more than $280,000 for personal use of Qualcomm's (QCOM) corporate aircraft and more than $4,000 for things such as home office costs, personal travel and entertainment.

Read Full Story