25 Worst Public Schools in America Methodology

When any study is conducted to compare and rate schools, the methodology is key. The findings reported here use each school's own No Child Left Behind test scores, but standardized by Neighborhood Scout's patent-pending methodology for true national comparison.

It is well known that the quality of education provided by public schools varies greatly across the country. Still further, the quality of a child's education can vary significantly from school district to school district within a state and can even be widely varied between two different schools within the same school district.

In an attempt to quantify student performance and to improve the performance of elementary and secondary schools across America, the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act was signed into law in January of 2002. The NCLB has earmarked billions of dollars that are directed to nationwide educational reform and improvement. Under NCLB each state receives federal dollars for its public and charter schools based on the performance of their schools. One of the main mechanisms for assessing performance is through testing and test scores. As a result, schools have begun placing far more of an emphasis on preparing students for these NCLB standardized tests.

28 PHOTOS
25 Worst Performing Public Schools in the U.S.
See Gallery
25 Worst Public Schools in America Methodology
Neighborhood Scout used their patent-pending school rating algorithm to uncover and identify the 100 worst public schools in America. The calculations used to create this ranking involve the students' proficiency in reading and math as determined by the 'No Child Left Behind' state testing for each school, and the National Assessment for Educational Progress. The worst performing schools are found in 20 different states, some in inner city urban areas, and some in rural America.

Click through our gallery to see the 25 worst.
' See Full Methodology
First Up: No. 25 Worst School
Milwaukee, Wis.
Grades Served: 9-12
Students Enrolled: 114

School's 'State Test' Scores vs. State
(Grade 11)
Proficient in Math: 11% vs. 75%
Proficient in Reading: 0% vs. 71%

' More on This School

Next: No. 24 Worst School
Chicago, Ill.
Grades Served: 9-12
Students Enrolled: 1126

School's 'State Test' Scores vs. State
(Grade 11)
Proficient in Math: 4% vs. 54%
Proficient in Reading: 9% vs. 58%

' More on This School
Next: No. 23 Worst School
Philadelphia, Pa.
Grades Served: 9-12
Students Enrolled: 456

School's 'State Test' Scores vs. State
(Grade 11)
Proficient in Math: 0% vs. 54%
Proficient in Reading: 3% vs. 65%

' More on This School
Next: No. 22 Worst School
Columbia, S.C.
Grades Served: 6-8
Students Enrolled: 344

School's 'State Test' Scores vs. State
(Grade 6)
Proficient in Math: 9% vs. 37%
Proficient in Reading: 12% vs. 31%

' More on This School
Next: No. 21 Worst School
Chicago, Ill.
Grades Served: 10-12
Students Enrolled: 637

School's 'State Test' Scores vs. State
(Grade 11)
Proficient in Math: 3% vs. 54%
Proficient in Reading: 8% vs. 58%

' More on This School
Next: No. 20 Worst School
Columbus, Ohio
Grades Served: 6-8
Students Enrolled: 148

School's 'State Test' Scores vs. State
(Grade 8)
Proficient in Math: 8% vs. 72%
Proficient in Reading: 4% vs. 80%

' More on This School
Next: No. 19 Worst School
Highland Park, Mich.
Grades Served: KG-6
Students Enrolled: 339

School's 'State Test' Scores vs. State
(Grade 4)
Proficient in Math: 0% vs. 82%
Proficient in Reading: 13% vs. 83%

' More on This School
Next: No. 18 Worst School
Chicago, Ill.
Grades Served: 9-12
Students Enrolled: 1261

School's 'State Test' Scores vs. State
(Grade 11)
Proficient in Math: 2% vs. 54%
Proficient in Reading: 8% vs. 58%

' More on This School
Next: No. 17 Worst School
Greenville, S.C.
Grades Served: 6-8
Students Enrolled: 568

School's 'State Test' Scores vs. State
(Grade 8)
Proficient in Math: 4% vs. 22%
Proficient in Reading: 7% vs. 25%

' More on This School
Next: No. 16 Worst School
Editor's Correction:
Dorman High Freshman Campus (Roebuck, S.C.) was originally included as No. 16. based on incorrect No Child Left Behind (NCLB) raw data provided by SchoolDataDirect. Dorman should not have been included at all, because there is insufficient test data to include them, given that it's a 9th grade only school in a state where 9th graders do not take the state-specific NCLB. Our apologies to the Dorman High Freshman Campus.
Next: No. 15 Worst School
Sacaton, Ariz.
Grades Served: 6-12
Students Enrolled: 67

School's 'State Test' Scores vs. State
(Grade 10)
Proficient in Math: 0% vs. 69%
Proficient in Reading: 9% vs. 74%

' More on This School
Next: No. 14 Worst School
Columbia, S.C.
Grades Served: 6-8
Students Enrolled: 494

School's 'State Test' Scores vs. State
(Grade 8)
Proficient in Math: 3% vs. 22%
Proficient in Reading: 5% vs. 25%

' More on This School
Next: No. 13 Worst School
Florence, S.C.
Grades Served: 7-12
Students Enrolled: 21

School's 'State Test' Scores vs. State
(Grade 7)
Proficient in Math: 8% vs. 32%
Proficient in Reading: 8% vs. 26%

' More on This School
Next: No. 12 Worst School
Charleston, S.C.
Grades Served: KG-5
Students Enrolled: 94

School's 'State Test' Scores vs. State
(Grade 5)
Proficient in Math: 0% vs. 34%
Proficient in Reading: 7% vs. 34%

' More on This School
Next: No. 11 Worst School
Poughkeepsie, N.Y.
Grades Served: KG-8
Students Enrolled: 90

School's 'State Test' Scores vs. State
(Grade 8)
Proficient in Math: 8% vs. 54%
Proficient in Reading: 0% vs. 49%

' More on This School
Next: No. 10 Worst School
Columbia, S.C.
Grades Served: 4-8
Students Enrolled: 76

School's 'State Test' Scores vs. State
(Grade 6)
Proficient in Math: 10% vs. 37%
Proficient in Reading: 5% vs. 31%

' More on This School
Next: No. 9 Worst School
North Charleston, S.C.
Grades Served: 6-8
Students Enrolled: 582

School's 'State Test' Scores vs. State
(Grade 8)
Proficient in Math: 4% vs. 22%
Proficient in Reading: 4% vs. 25%

' More on This School
Next: No. 8 Worst School
North Charleston, S.C.
Grades Served: 6-8
Students Enrolled: 814

School's 'State Test' Scores vs. State
(Grade 8)
Proficient in Math: 3% vs. 22%
Proficient in Reading: 5% vs. 25%

' More on This School
Next: No. 7 Worst School
St. Francis, S.D.
Grades Served: PK-8
Students Enrolled: 92

School's 'State Test' Scores vs. State
(Grade 5)
Proficient in Math: 0 vs. 76%
Proficient in Reading: 42% vs. 85%

' More on This School
Next: No. 6 Worst School
Chicago, Ill.
Grades Served: 9-12
Students Enrolled: 1258

School's 'State Test' Scores vs. State
(Grade 11)
Proficient in Math: 2% vs. 54%
Proficient in Reading: 5% vs. 58%

' More on This School
Next: No. 5 Worst School
North Charleston, S.C.
Grades Served: 9-12
Students Enrolled: 37

School's 'State Test' Scores vs. State
(Grade 9)
Proficient in Math: 0% vs. 36%
Proficient in Reading: 9% vs. 38%

' More on This School
Next: No. 4 Worst School
Milwaukee, Wis.
Grades Served: 9-12
Students Enrolled: 120

School's 'State Test' Scores vs. State
(Grade 10)
Proficient in Math: 5% vs. 71%
Proficient in Reading: 0% vs. 75%

' More on This School
Next: No. 3 Worst School
Milwaukee, Wis.
Grades Served: 9-12
Students Enrolled: 145

School's 'State Test' Scores vs. State
(Grade 10)
Proficient in Math: 0% vs. 71%
Proficient in Reading: 4% vs. 75%

' More on This School
Next: No. 2 Worst School
Aiken, S.C.
Grades Served: 5-8
Students Enrolled: 61

School's 'State Test' Scores vs. State
(Grade 7)
Proficient in Math: 0% vs. 32%
Proficient in Reading: 6% vs. 26%

' More on This School
Next: No. 1 Worst School
East St. Louis, Ill.
Grades Served: 9-12
Students Enrolled: 181

School's 'State Test' Scores vs. State
(Grade 11)
Proficient in Math: 0% vs. 54%
Proficient in Reading: 3% vs. 58%

' More on This School
' See All 100 Worst Schools
' See Full Methodology
Next: More From AOL
HIDE CAPTION
SHOW CAPTION
of
SEE ALL
BACK TO SLIDE

While theoretically, the concept of a national NCLB standardized test should provide a milestone by which to compare the performance of all of the schools in the country relative to one another, the actual test is not truly standardized. This is because while the federal government passed down guidelines and standards for the creation of a testing mechanism, the states themselves were left to develop, implement and administer the actual NCLB tests. As a result, despite the federal guidelines and standards, there is still a wide variation in the difficulty and content of the actual tests that have been implemented from state to state. Therefore any school comparison system that employs strictly the NCLB results as a basis for comparison is likely skewed due to the widespread differences in the underlying tests.

Accordingly, there is a need for a method and system that provides normalization of the performance data for all schools across the nation, and which can provide a meaningful basis for comparison of school performance on a national basis.

NeighborhoodScout has invented a patent-pending method and system to directly compare school districts and individual schools across state lines based on their reported NCLB test scores, even though the tests are entirely different in each state.

The methodology operates on the basis that all students attending public elementary and secondary schools must take the NCLB offered within their state. While the NCLB test results can provide a meaningful comparison between any students and schools that were administered the same test, since the tests are different state-to-state, a comparison on this basis is generally inaccurate and unreliable. To normalize the NCLB test results based on the differences, Scout's methodology employs an additional factor that is employed as a modifier of the NCLB test results.

In addition to the NCLB testing, a population of randomly selected students in each state also takes the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) test. The NAEP test is the closest thing to a gold standard national test and it is administered in the same form to every student who takes the test. The difficulty in using this test as a basis for comparison on its own is that there are not enough students in any one school or school district that take the test to make it statistically significant for comparison. It is of note however that although the NAEP is the same in every location the results reported by the NAEP often differ significantly from the NCLB results for any given state.

For example, the average percentage of students who passed the NAEP in a recent year in Mississippi was 16% while in Massachusetts the pass rate was 45%, even though the test is the same. In contrast, Mississippi's recent state-specific NCLB testing scores show that nearly 75% of their students were proficient or advanced, making it look like Mississippi has an outstanding public school system. The reality however is that Mississippi's NCLB scores are high because their NCLB test is less challenging then the NAEP.

As a result neither of the available tests provides an ideal set of data for the comparison of schools on a nationwide basis. The NCLB is often skewed because of local test development bias and the NEAP is not administered on a widespread enough basis.

NeighborhoodScout's method takes the average percentage of students testing as proficient or advanced in reading and math on the NCLB state-specific test and subtracts the percentage of students in that same state who passed the NAEP, either in total or for these specific subjects. This subtraction produces a state-specific gap value that is then subtracted from each school and school district's NCLB proficiency percentages. Once the NCLB results are adjusted, the schools and the school districts nationwide are then ranked relative to one another. As a result, the methodology provides a curve that brings all individual schools and every school district to a nationally comparable rating based on the NCLB testing results.

From this research, the 100 Worst Public Schools in America have been identified. They are found in twenty different states, some in inner city urban areas, and some in rural America. All schools, regardless of the grade-levels served, have a charge of preparing their students for the next level, which is assessed by grade-appropriate testing, mandated by the federal government and developed and applied by the state department of education. Some schools do exceptionally well in preparing their students for the next step, and some do far less well. When we examine the schools using this yardstick of assessing how well the schools prepare their students for the next step, we end up with a mix of elementary, middle, and high schools as worst performers across the nation.

Read Full Story

Can't get enough personal finance tips?

Sign up for Finance Report by AOL and get everything from consumer news to money tricks delivered directly to your inbox daily!

Subscribe to our other newsletters

Emails may offer personalized content or ads. Learn more. You may unsubscribe any time.