A mass murderer responsible for killing 77 people in Norway just won part of a human-rights case against the government

Norway's Mass Killer Sues to End Prison Isolation
Norway's Mass Killer Sues to End Prison Isolation

A Norwegian mass murderer has won part of a human-rights case against the government.

Anders Behring Breivik, a right-wing extremist who was responsible for the deaths of 77 people in Norway in July 2011, sued the Norwegian government after his arrest and imprisonment for having violated his human rights.

SEE ALSO: Trump's 'wig farm' in Norway has the internet ablaze

An Oslo district court has now ruled that the Norwegian government did indeed violate Breivik's rights as they breached an article prohibiting degrading treatment of prisoners under the European Convention on Human Rights.

The ruling cited that authorities did not give enough attention to Breivik's mental health when determining his conditions in prison. The court also ordered the Norwegian government to pay Breivik's legal costs of $41,000 (331,000 kroner).

During his 2011 killing spree, Breivik detonated a bomb in Oslo and then went on a shooting spree on a nearby island in which dozens of teenagers at a camp were killed.

Breivik claimed during his initial trail in 2012 that he was "a military commander in the Norwegian resistance movement and Knights Templar Norway."

His attacks were aimed at stopping the spread of multiculturalism and Muslim immigration into the country.

RELATED: See photos from Anders Behring Breivik's unfolding case:

After his initial trial in 2011, Breivik has been held in isolation in a luxurious prison cell.

According to Agence France Presse, Breivik's cell has three rooms, "one for living, one for studying, and a third for physical exercise — as well as a television, a computer without internet access and a game console. He is able to prepare his own food and do his own laundry."

However, Breivik and his lawyer are suing Norway, claiming the state has violated two clauses of the European Convention on Human Rights, thus violating his human rights in prison.

Breivik maintains that Oslo's treatment of him violates the clauses against "inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment," and also the clauses guaranteeing prisoners the right to respect for "private and family life" and "correspondence," AFP notes.

A Norwegian court supported Breivik's case of suffering under "inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment," but the court dismissed his claim or having his right to see and correspond with his family as having been violated.

As Fusion notes, his complaints stemmed from the fact that Breivik is essentially being kept in isolation. His cell is set off from the rest of the prison complex, isolating him from the other prisoners. He also infrequently has guests, causing his main human interaction to be with his guards. His mail is also censored.

This isolation has apparently taken a psychological toll on him, Breivik's lawyer told AFP.

Breivik has previously stated that he has been forced to strip 880 times in total while a prisoner, Reuters reports.

However, Breivik has had a history of complaining about his life in prison. As The New Yorkerreported in 2015, Breivik has complained about everything in prison, ranging from how his room had a PlayStation 2 instead of a PlayStation 3 and the quality of the rubber pen he is allowed to write with in his cell.

Breivik's complaints, including his near complete isolation, would be hard to square with the American view of prisons. Prisons in Norway are nearly unimaginably luxurious, with the aim being rehabilitation instead of penalization. The prisons include vocational classes, video-game consoles, well-prepared kitchens, and in some cases even recording studios with instruments.

Many of these luxuries are unavailable to Breivik, however. Still, he is currently serving only a 21-year sentence for his crime, which is the maximum sentence under Norway's penal system.

In 2033, at the end of his sentence, Breivik will be evaluated to see if rehabilitation has been successful. If it is judged to have not been, his sentence can be extended for five-year increments indefinitely.