Obama: Senate Republicans' decision to oppose SCOTUS nomination 'dangerous'

Obama: Republicans Risk Eroding Public Morale Over Supreme Court Row

President Obama is growing increasingly frustrated with Senate Republicans' refusal to hold a hearing for Merrick Garland, his pick for the Supreme Court following the sudden death of Justice Antonin Scalia. And during an appearance at the University of Chicago on Thursday, Obama made the case for conservatives to end their unprecedented blockade of Garland and get on with the nomination process.

SEE ALSO: Pope calls for compassionate Church open to 'imperfect' Catholics

But more than that, he foreshadowed a future, stemming from conservatives' insistence that the next president choose the new justice, in which the nomination process becomes entirely political -- "a majoritarian exercise of who controls the presidency and who controls the Senate."

"Nobody has plausibly made the argument that this is not the kind of person we'd want on the Supreme Court," Obama said during an question-and-answer session with faculty and students. "The question then becomes: Why is it so hard for the guy just to get a hearing and a vote?"

RELATED: Obama appoints new Supreme Court justice Merrick Garland:

9 PHOTOS
Obama appoints new Supreme Court justice Merrick Garland
See Gallery
Obama: Senate Republicans' decision to oppose SCOTUS nomination 'dangerous'
FILE PHOTO -- U.S. President Barack Obama annnounces Judge Merrick Garland (R) of the United States Court of Appeals as his nominee for the U.S. Supreme Court in the Rose Garden of the White House in Washington March 16, 2016. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque/File Photo
Judge Merrick Garland, President Obama's Supreme Court nominee, meets with Senator Barbara Boxer (D-CA) on Capitol Hill in Washington, U.S., May 25, 2016. REUTERS/Joshua Roberts
Judge Merrick Garland, President Obama's Supreme Court nominee, meets with Senator Barbara Boxer (D-CA) (unseen) on Capitol Hill in Washington, U.S., May 25, 2016. REUTERS/Joshua Roberts
WASHINGTON, DC - MARCH 16: U.S. President Barack Obama and Judge Merrick Garland, the president's nominee to replace the late Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, walk into the Rose Garden at the White House, March 16, 2016 in Washington, DC. Merrick currently serves on the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, and if confirmed by the US Senate, would replace Antonin Scalia who died suddenly last month. (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
WASHINGTON, DC - MARCH 16: Judge Merrick Garland speaks after being introduced by U.S. President Barack Obama as his nominee to the Supreme Court in the Rose Garden at the White House, March 16, 2016 in Washington, DC. Garland currently serves as the chief judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit and if confirmed by the US Senate, would replace the late Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia who died suddenly last month. (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
U.S. President Barack Obama, left, shakes hands with Merrick Garland, chief judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, following the announcement of his nomination for the Supreme Court in the Rose Garden at the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., on Wednesday, March 16, 2016. The nomination escalates a battle that will dominate the final 10 months of Obama's presidency, as the White House is locked in an unprecedented dispute with Senate Republican leaders who have pledged to ignore the president's choice. Photographer: Joshua Roberts/Bloomberg via Getty Images
U.S. President Barack Obama, center, announces his nominee for the Supreme Court, Merrick Garland, chief judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, right, as Vice President Joseph 'Joe' Biden looks on in the Rose Garden of the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., on Wednesday, March 16, 2016. The nomination escalates a battle that will dominate the final 10 months of Obama's presidency, as the White House is locked in an unprecedented dispute with Senate Republican leaders who have pledged to ignore the president's choice. Photographer: Joshua Roberts/Bloomberg via Getty Images
US President Barack Obama joins his Supreme Court nominee, federal appeals court judge Merrick Garland (L), during the nomination announcement the Rose Garden of the White House in Washington, DC, March 16, 2016. Garland, 63, is currently Chief Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. The nomination sets the stage for an election-year showdown with Republicans who have made it clear they have no intention of holding hearings to vet any Supreme Court nominee put forward by the president. / AFP / SAUL LOEB (Photo credit should read SAUL LOEB/AFP/Getty Images)
HIDE CAPTION
SHOW CAPTION
of
SEE ALL
BACK TO SLIDE

He went on, "what you have here is, I think, a circumstance in which those in the Senate have decided that placating [their] base is more important than upholding their constitutional and institutional rules in our democracy in a way that is dangerous." He warned that, if he's succeeded by a Republican, Democrats in the senate might retaliate against any future nominee by blocking them in kind, which could leave the seat empty for a prolonged period.

Americans are already beginning to see the Supreme Court through a partisan lens, and if the nomination process gets even messier, Obama said it could "erode the integrity of the judicial branch." "The courts will be just an extension of our legislatures and our elections and our politics," he said. "At that point, people lose confidence in the ability of the courts to fairly adjudicate cases and controversies."

Senate Republicans, of course, deny that their refusal to acknowledge Obama's nominee is about politics at all. But in a speech to the Senate on Tuesday, Senator Chuck Grassley, the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, equated "following the law" with "advancing conservative policy." "Justices appointed by Republicans are generally committed to following the law," he said. "But some of the Justices appointed by Republicans often don't vote in a way that advances conservative policy." He went on:

If we want the confirmation process to be less divisive, if we want the public to have more confidence that the Justices haven't exceeded their constitutional role, then the Justices need to demonstrate that in politically sensitive cases, their decisions are based on the Constitution and the law and not on their political preferences.

No doubt the Republican base -- the one Obama fears Grassley and others are seeking to placate -- would agree.

Read Full Story

Sign up for Breaking News by AOL to get the latest breaking news alerts and updates delivered straight to your inbox.

Subscribe to our other newsletters

Emails may offer personalized content or ads. Learn more. You may unsubscribe any time.