Obama's Nobel Prize fell short of hopes: committee insider

Before you go, we thought you'd like these...
Before you go close icon
Obama's Nobel Prize Fell Short of Hopes

OSLO (Reuters) -- The effect of giving the 2009 Nobel Peace Prize to U.S. President Barack Obama fell short of the nominating committee's hopes, and several awards in the past 25 years were even more questionable, the committee's former secretary says in a new book.

Geir Lundestad, lifting a veil on the secretive five-member panel, also reveals that former German chancellor Helmut Kohl, late Czech president Vaclav Havel and several rock stars were among those who were considered for the award but never won.

Lundestad writes in "Secretary of Peace" that the prize to Obama was the most controversial during his time as director of the Norwegian Nobel Institute from 1990-2015. He attended committee meetings but had no vote.

"Even many of Obama's supporters thought the prize was a mistake," Lundestad wrote, adding that many Americans viewed the award as making Obama a spokesman for international peacemaking values rather than their own interests.

"In that sense the committee did not achieve what it hoped for," he wrote, noting Obama himself rarely mentioned the prize.

4 PHOTOS
Obama - 2009 Nobel Peace Prize
See Gallery
Obama's Nobel Prize fell short of hopes: committee insider
US President Barack Obama works in the Oval office in White House in Washington, DC, on October 9, 2009. Obama won the Nobel Peace Prize just nine months into his term in office, prompting world leaders to urge him to use the accolade to step up efforts for global peace. AFP PHOTO/Jewel SAMAD (Photo credit should read JEWEL SAMAD/AFP/Getty Images)
Nobel Peace Prize laureate, US President Barack Obama (C) and First Lady Michelle Obama arrive for the Nobel Peace prize award ceremony at the City Hall in Oslo on December 10, 2009. The president faces a tricky task of reconciling the revered honor with his decision just last week to send 30,000 troops to escalate the war in Afghanistan, a move which tripled the US force there since he took office. AFP PHOTO / OLIVIER MORIN (Photo credit should read OLIVIER MORIN/AFP/Getty Images)
A couple display placards congratulating US President Barack Obama on winning Nobel Peace Prize outside the White House in Washington, DC, on October 9, 2009. Awarding Obama the Nobel Peace Prize so soon after taking office is a 'controversial' decision aimed at encouraging him to achieve his goals, analysts said. AFP PHOTO/Jewel SAMAD (Photo credit should read JEWEL SAMAD/AFP/Getty Images)
HIDE CAPTION
SHOW CAPTION
of
SEE ALL
BACK TO SLIDE

The award, made by the committee in particular recognition of Obama's vision of ridding the world of nuclear weapons, was widely criticized in the United States as premature. It came just nine months after he took office.

Lundestad, a professor of American history, said he had strong doubts before the award but denied Norwegian media reports that he regretted it. The five-member committee was unanimous in awarding the prize.

In the past 25 years "there were no obvious mistakes," Lundestad said. But two or three were questionable, such as the 2004 award to late Kenyan environmental activist Wangari Maathai, he added.

Maathai was the first to get an award for environmental protection, with a campaign to plant millions of trees across Africa, but "it's far from given that she was the best candidate," he wrote.

He said former Canadian Foreign Minister Lloyd Axworthy should perhaps have shared the 1997 prize awarded to the International Campaign to Ban Landmines and its coordinator, Jody Williams. It was Canada that launched the process that led to a treaty to eliminate landmines, signed in Ottawa that year.

Lundestad noted that campaigning rock stars such as Bono, Bob Geldof and Sting had all enjoyed a high profile in international politics. "In the 2000s several such names were in fact considered, but the conclusion was that these artists were better suited to receiving Grammy prizes than Nobel Prizes," he wrote.

He said he wanted to push for greater openness around the prize, which has a 50-year secrecy rule.

"We plan to read the book first before making any comment," said Annika Pontikis, spokeswoman of the Nobel Foundation in Stockholm which oversees prizes from Chemistry to Literature.

Earlier on AOL.com:

How To Win A Nobel Prize:  Epic How To

More from AOL.com:
Computer use might be hurting students' reading skills
Now arriving: airport control towers with no humans inside
More than 2,000 enslaved fishermen rescued in 6 months

Read Full Story

Sign up for Breaking News by AOL to get the latest breaking news alerts and updates delivered straight to your inbox.

Subscribe to our other newsletters

Emails may offer personalized content or ads. Learn more. You may unsubscribe any time.

From Our Partners

Large Numbers Of Horses Are Being Stuffed Into These Crates For A Despicable Reason Large Numbers Of Horses Are Being Stuffed Into These Crates For A Despicable Reason
13 People Recount Their First Kiss Horror Stories 13 People Recount Their First Kiss Horror Stories
Man Suspects His Wife Is Cheating On Him - Then His Daughter Reveals What's Really Going Man Suspects His Wife Is Cheating On Him - Then His Daughter Reveals What's Really Going