Google blames humans for self-driving car crashes -- again

Google Blames Humans for Self-Driving Car Crashes -- Again

In the video above, it shows Google's first self-driving car accident that hurt humans. Passengers were treated for whiplash and minor injuries. But as Google would like to point out -- the self-driving car stopped. It was the car behind it that "slammed into the back of us at 17 mph --  and it hadn't braked at all."

According to Google, the reason its self-driving cars are getting into crashes is ... us. Humans. You know, the ones who are doing things like texting and driving.

Since 2009, Google's cars have been involved in 14 crashes. In 11 of those crashes, the car was rear-ended. Google says other drivers were the cause of all of those incidents.

"In 1885, Carl Benz invented the automobile. Later that year he took it out for the first public test drive and, true story, crashed into a wall. For the last 130 years we've been working around that least reliable part of the car, the driver," said Chris Urmson, the head of Google's driverless car program.

Take a look at technology with potentially dangerous side effects:

2 PHOTOS
Potentially harmful technologies: drones, self driving cars, hoverboards
See Gallery
Google blames humans for self-driving car crashes -- again
KNUTSFORD, ENGLAND - OCTOBER 13: A youth poses as he rides a hoverboard, which are also known as self-balancing scooters and balance boards, on October 13, 2015 in Knutsford, England. The British Crown Prosecution Service have declared that the devices are illegal as they are are too unsafe to ride on the road, and too dangerous to ride on the pavement. (Photo by Christopher Furlong/Getty Images)
HIDE CAPTION
SHOW CAPTION
of
SEE ALL
BACK TO SLIDE

But even though the head of Google's driverless car program says that humans are the safety problem ...

Safety is actually the main reason people wouldn't want a driverless car, according to a recent study.

SurveyMonkey and the University of Michigan found just 15.6 percent of respondents said they would prefer a fully autonomous car, compared to 40.6 percent who want a partially autonomous vehicle and 43.8 percent who said they have no interest in autonomous vehicles.

So companies making self-driving cars have their work cut out for them. They have to convince humans that humans are actually the problem.

Which is why Chris Urmson, the same guy from the TED talk, wrote about the crashes on Medium: "Our self-driving cars can pay attention to hundreds of objects at once ... and they never get tired, irritable or distracted. ... The clear theme is human error and inattention."

Google Inc. (GOOGL) | FindTheCompany

More from AOL.com:
New seaweed tastes just like bacon and is healthier than kale
Ancient tooth provides evidence of prehistoric dentistry
'Star Wars' calls Amy Schumer risqué GQ cover 'inappropriate'

Read Full Story

Sign up for Breaking News by AOL to get the latest breaking news alerts and updates delivered straight to your inbox.

Subscribe to our other newsletters

Emails may offer personalized content or ads. Learn more. You may unsubscribe any time.