England's King Richard III identified with DNA

Before you go, we thought you'd like these...
Before you go close icon
Richard III DNA Questions Royal Family's Legitimacy

LONDON (AP) - Scientists say there is "overwhelming evidence" that a skeleton found under a parking lot is that of England's King Richard III, but their DNA testing also has raised questions about the nobility of some of his royal successors.

The bones of the 15th-century king were dug up in the city of Leicester in 2012, and experts have published initial data suggesting they belong to Richard, including an analysis of his curved spine and the injuries that killed him.

Richard was the last English monarch to die on a battlefield, in 1485.

In the new study - probably the oldest forensic case ever solved - scientists compared DNA from the skeleton to living relatives and analyzed DNA data identifying eye and hair color, which they matched to the earliest known portrait of the king.

9 PHOTOS
King Richard III identified with DNA
See Gallery
England's King Richard III identified with DNA
portrait King Richard III, Leicester Cathedral, Leicester, England, UK
Richard III of England (1452-1485) on engraving from 1830. King of England during 1483-1485.
Bosworth Battlefield, near Hinckley, Leicestershire, UK. 18th Aug, 2013. The Wars of the Roses Federation re-enact the 528th Anniversary of the Battle of Bosworth (22nd August 1485) King Richard III watches the battle prior to his defeat when he lost the throne of England to Henry Tudor. He was the last English king to die in Battle. This battle was the last significant battle in the Wars of the Roses a civil war between the houses of York and Lancaster © eye35/Alamy Live News
Guide booklets about King Richard the Third displayed inside Leicester Cathedral.
A stone inside Leicester Cathedral acknowledging that King Richard the Third maybe be buried nearby.
Stone marking the spot where King Richard III fell, Bosworth Field, Leicestershire. Artist: Graham Easby
A portrait of King Richard the Third inside Leicester Cathedral.
A road sign in City Centre, Leicester.
HIDE CAPTION
SHOW CAPTION
of
SEE ALL
BACK TO SLIDE

"The probability that this is Richard is 99.999 percent," said Turi King, a geneticist at the University of Leicester who led the research. When she and colleagues compared the skeleton's DNA obtained from the ground-up powder of one tooth and a leg bone to samples provided by a 14th cousin on Richard's maternal side, they found a perfect match.

Based on the skeleton's DNA, King and colleagues hypothesized that Richard had blue eyes and blond hair in childhood, which darkened with age. With no contemporary paintings of the king available, they compared their findings to the earliest known painting of him, which depicts the monarch with light brown hair and blue eyes, painted about 25 years after his death.

The research was published Tuesday in the journal, Nature Communications.

Scientists also compared the skeleton's DNA to samples from living relatives on Richard's father's side. They found no match, a discovery that could throw the nobility of some royals into question.

While researchers weren't able to say where on the family tree the adultery occurred, they said the findings potentially raise questions about the legitimacy of Henry V, Henry VI and the entire Tudor dynasty, including Henry VIII and Elizabeth I.

Still, Kevin Schurer, pro vice chancellor of the University of Leicester and another study author, said claims to the throne are based on more than simply having royal blood and also rest on other things such as battlefield victories and royal marriages.

He said England's current royal family - which has a line of descent from the House of Tudor - should not be worried. "We are not in any way indicating that Her Majesty (Elizabeth II) shouldn't be on the throne," Schurer said.

Researchers said it was the first time there was scientific evidence that questioned medieval lines of succession in the monarchy.

Other academics said history is littered with claims and counter-claims of royal legitimacy.

"When Richard took the throne, he said his brother Edward should never have been king because he was illegitimate," said Steven Gunn, a tutor in history at Oxford University.

Gunn said it was unlikely anyone would ever learn the truth behind the most damaging rumors about Richard - that he murdered his young nephews to hang onto his crown. Still, Gunn said, a more complex picture of the king is now emerging.

"This opens up a new posthumous discussion about Richard's legacy," the historian said. "He has been misrepresented as just a king with scoliosis."

___

Online:

www.nature.com

___

Associated Press writer Jill Lawless in London contributed.

See more about the new finding:
DNA Proves Car Park Remains Are Richard III, Scientists Say

More on AOL:
Reporter dodges bullets during interview about local shooting
Burt Reynolds reacts to rumors that he's 'broke'
Rare Shakespeare folio discovered in French town
Read Full Story

Sign up for Breaking News by AOL to get the latest breaking news alerts and updates delivered straight to your inbox.

Subscribe to our other newsletters

Emails may offer personalized content or ads. Learn more. You may unsubscribe any time.

From Our Partners

12 Facts That Will Make You Smarter Than Your Friends 12 Facts That Will Make You Smarter Than Your Friends
Nature Gets Revenge On Safari Hunter Who Killed Elephants And Lions For Sport Nature Gets Revenge On Safari Hunter Who Killed Elephants And Lions For Sport
Man Is Horrified To Learn His Biological Father's Identity - But A Look In The Mirror Man Is Horrified To Learn His Biological Father's Identity - But A Look In The Mirror