Why Stocks Aren't as Risky as You Think
Stocks are risky, right? In this segment of The Motley Fool's financials-focused show, Where the Money Is, banking analysts Matt Koppenheffer and David Hanson discuss the notion that investors with decades in front of them may be better off without bonds and cash in their portfolio.
David cities that the annualized total return for the S&P 500 from March 1989 to March 2009 (the bottom of the market's crash during the financial crisis) was still over 7%.
The stock vs. bond debate: What's the best investing strategy?
It's no secret that investors tend to be impatient with the market, but the best investment strategy is to buy shares in solid businesses and keep them for the long term. In the special free report "3 Stocks That Will Help You Retire Rich," The Motley Fool shares investment ideas and strategies that could help you build wealth for years to come. Click here to grab your free copy today.
The article Why Stocks Aren't as Risky as You Think originally appeared on Fool.com.Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Copyright © 1995 - 2014 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.