Twitter's Bonehead Move a Sign of Things to Come
Imagine you're fed up with the crazy rants your "friend" continually posts on Facebook . What do you do? You block him or her from seeing your posts, and you from seeing theirs, then you aren't subjected to their craziness in the future. Seems simple enough.
Twitter took a different tack when it decided on Thursday what constitutes privacy for its 232 million monthly active users (MAUs) by changing its policy when tweeters wanted to block their posts from those they'd gotten tired of. Sure, you could block them, but after Twitter's policy change, they'd still see every post you tweeted. In an age of heightened awareness surrounding privacy issues thanks to Edward Snowden and the NSA, what in the world was Twitter thinking?
According to Twitter, the problem with the old, and now new, policy was that blocked tweeters were alerted when a user opted to cut them off. That, Twitter said, was the impetus for those who were blocked to begin a tweeting rampage of abuse against the person doing the blocking. That sort of makes sense; no one wants to be cut off, and it's not hard to imagine some angry tweets as a result.
To fix the possibility of user retaliation after being ostracized, Twitter updated its policy so that blocked folks wouldn't know they were being blocked. Problem was, the updated policy allowed the blocked users to still receive all the tweets sent from the person who blocked them, and that struck a nerve that resonated across the Twitter universe on Friday. Within hours, nearly 2,000 users had signed an online petition to do away with the new policy, and to its credit, Twitter listened -- albeit grudgingly.
The tip of the iceberg
Just like the early days of Facebook, Twitter investors are betting on its ability to monetize its growing MAUs, and that means pushing the privacy and user data envelope to lure advertisers. Facebook is hardly immune to user backlash when privacy issues arise. When Facebook bought Instagram earlier this year for a cool $1 billion, CEO Mark Zuckerberg was forced to address privacy concerns surrounding Instagram's policy allowing it to employ user data in advertising initiatives without their permission.
Improved advertising click-through rates equate to increased revenues, which Facebook can attest to. The 66% jump in Facebook's advertising revenues in the recently announced Q3 compared to last year isn't an accident. Facebook is learning more and more about the habits of its 1.2 billion MAUs and using that information to lure its bread-and-butter: advertisers. Twitter has to do the same thing, sooner as opposed to later, to even come close to justifying its crazy valuation.
Final Foolish thoughts
The notion, as some in the media have suggested and apparently investors bought into, that Twitter's quick response to fixing its monumental mistake is indicative of what a great company it is, doesn't fly. Twitter's statement made it clear that it changed back to its original policy grudgingly, and that should speak volumes to users going forward.
The scary part? Twitter's policy change, and the manner in which it responded to user backlash, is just a precursor of things to come. Twitter, like Facebook, may not be in the same league as the now infamous NSA, but you can be certain tweeters everywhere haven't heard the last about user privacy. Shareholders demanding increased advertising revenues to warrant its nearly $33 billion valuation will make certain of that.
A few alternatives to Twitter
Interested in the next tech revolution? Then you'll need to learn about the radical technology shift some say forced the mighty Bill Gates into a premature retirement. Meanwhile, early in-the-know investors are already getting filthy rich off it, by quietly investing in the three companies that control its fortune-making future. You've heard of one of them, but probably not of the other two. To find out what they are, click here to watch this shocking video presentation!
The article Twitter's Bonehead Move a Sign of Things to Come originally appeared on Fool.com.Fool contributor Tim Brugger has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Facebook. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Copyright © 1995 - 2013 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.