Stockton, California: The Bleeding Edge of a Scary Economic Trend
Municipal bankruptcies are nothing new -- as The San Francisco Chronicle reported earlier this week, there have been 42 since 1981. In recent years, though, the number of bankruptcies has sharply increased; since 2008, 10 municipalities have sought court protection to help them discharge their debts.
Ending Up in Court
Towns, cities and counties end up in bankruptcy court for a variety of reasons: Desert Hot Springs, Calif., got there in 2001 because of a huge housing discrimination lawsuit, while Orange County, Calif., ended up filing due to an investment fund meltdown that eventually led to the prosecution of the county's treasurer. Millport, Ala.'s 2005 failure was the result of a loss of sales tax revenue, and Washington Park, Ill., went to bankruptcy court in 2009 when a topless bar successfully fought against the city's five-figure licensing fees.
But these day, more municipalities are declaring bankruptcy for a far less interesting reason: They simply aren't bringing in enough tax money. That was the problem for Vallejo, Calif., which ended up in court in 2008 because it couldn't afford to fund its employee pensions. The same thing happened to Prichard, Ala., in 2009 and Central Falls, R.I., in 2011.
And beyond a few minor details, that's what happened to Stockton on Thursday.
From Prosperity to Poverty
Stockton's problems began in the mid-2000s, with what appeared to be a massive windfall. From 2000 to 2006, property values went through the roof, flooding the city's coffers and promising a bright future. The city, flush with cash, borrowed money for huge building projects and agreed to employee contracts that guaranteed generous yearly raises. The future looked bright.
In California, cities like Stockton don't have the power to increase property taxes when property values drop, leaving them only one option to balance budgets: cutting labor costs. Over the past two years, the city has laid off 40% of its employees, 25% of its policemen, and 33% of its firefighters. Unfortunately, these layoffs have come at a high cost: Stockton currently has the nation's second-highest foreclosure rates, one of its highest violent crime rates, and a 20.1% unemployment rate -- more than double the national average. According to city officials, Stockton's public safety is at a "crisis level."
With no approval for a tax increase on the horizon, it doesn't look like these problems will go away any time soon. Bankruptcy -- Stockton's last hope -- will allow it to renegotiate many of its contracts and adjust its payment schedule for creditors. What it won't do is bring in more money, which the city desperately needs if it hopes to restore its municipal services.
An All Too Common Problem
Stockton's situation is hardly rare. Across the country, municipalities that tied their tax revenues to the real estate market are facing shortfalls. Some, like Vallejo, Calif., -- which filed for bankruptcy in 2008 -- were also tied down by tough union contracts, but plenty of towns and cities that didn't offer particularly generous deals to public employees are nonetheless now scrambling to make ends meet.
Even areas that have managed to keep their fiscal houses in order are feeling the blow back from the recession. For example, Birmingham, Ala., which has an outstanding credit rating, tons of cash, and a low unemployment rate, is facing fiscal problems simply because of its proximity to Jefferson County, which declared bankruptcy in 2011. And, while municipal employee layoffs offer short-term solutions, they don't address the longer-term financial problems. Renegotiating contracts will help many governments get closer to solvency, but without a significant increase in revenue, an ever-growing number of towns, cities and counties will find themselves joining Stockton in bankruptcy court.
Bruce Watson is a senior features writer for DailyFinance. You can reach him by e-mail at firstname.lastname@example.org, or follow him on Twitter at@bruce1971.