Is IBM Compromising the Quality of Its Earnings?


There are two key conclusions to be drawn from International Business Machines' recent results. First, for the third quarter running, they were disappointing, and second, the stock is still cheap. Growth-oriented investors probably won't be turned on by such considerations, but value-based speculators may see IBM as too good to pass up.

IBM disappoints, but reaffirms targets
To put these results in context, here is a graph of its major business segments.

Source: company accounts.

Clearly, the last six quarters have been difficult for revenue growth. However, it is understandable because IBM's focus has been on exiting lower-margin businesses and focusing on reshaping the business toward higher-margin software and services sales. Moreover, its stated aim is to hit $16.90 in non-GAAP adjusted EPS for 2013, and ultimately hit $20 in EPS by 2015. Eagle-eyed readers will note that these earnings would put IBM on P/E of 10.2 and 8.8 times its 2013 and 2015 forecasts, respectively. Since management reinstated these targets, should investors just ignore the falling revenue and buy a cheap stock?

Believing the numbers
Ultimately, your decision will boil down to how much you believe in the numbers. The latest evidence suggests that the underlying picture is getting murky.

  • Diluted EPS rose 10.5% in the quarter, but pre-tax income actually fell 5.2%. The difference is due to a large reduction in the tax rate.

  • Buybacks played a part, too. If you assume that the tax rate and share count remained constant, IBM's EPS actually fell 5.2% for the quarter.

  • Last quarter, IBM predicted low single-digit growth for its global technology services, or GTS, but they came in at -1% on constant currency basis.

  • Last quarter's weakness in the BRICs continued, with Chinese sales down 22% (with hardware sales falling 40%) and they are not expected to grow again until the first quarter of 2014.

  • The weakness in software continues, with sales up just 2% in constant currency. Indeed, last quarter's strength was arguably due to rollover deals that were delayed from the first quarter.

In fact, the only segment that really performed well was its global business services segment, or GBS, which delivered constant currency sales growth of 5%. This was in-line with IBM's forecast of mid single-digit growth.

All told, this was a weak quarter for IBM. In common with its major rival, Oracle , IBM reported good growth in business analytics (up 8% year-to-date) and proudly trumpeted that it delivered $1 billion of cloud revenue in the quarter.However, cloud revenue only represents 4.2% of total sales, and the strength in business analytics highlights the fact that there is growth in IT spending, just not in the areas where IBM gets most of its revenue.Trends in software spending clearly favor software as a service companies like .

Comparing IBM with Oracle
The analogy with Oracle is a strong one. Both are highly cash-generative tech giants with cheap valuations. Both are facing some structural challenges to their hardware offerings due to an increasing willingness among firms to outsource technology infrastructure to the cloud. As usage of software as a service, or SaaS, increases, hardware margins could come under pressure for IBM and Oracle because corporations will not need to buy hardware systems to run their on-premise on-license software. In their defense, IBM and Oracle are trying to migrate toward cloud-based solutions, but it's going to take time to work through the pressures on their existing sales.

However, there is one key difference between the two companies. IBM has set its stall out to achieve the $20 EPS target in 2015, while Oracle has much more flexibility to adjust to changing market conditions. It's good for IBM to laud the $8 billion it used to make buybacks (and there is still $5.6 billion remaining in buyback authorization), but investors surely wouldn't want the company to rack up debt just to hit the $20 EPS target. Moreover, IBM may be using resources that it could instead use to make strategic investments in growth opportunities.

How the deal demonstrates Oracle's flexibility
IBM's net debt stands at nearly $27 billion (14.3% of its market cap), while Oracle has $15.2 billion (10.1% of its market cap) in net cash and liquid instruments. Simply put, Oracle is in a better financial position to make the kind of game-changing acquisitions that can help accelerate SaaS-based growth.

Moreover, with its recent strategic partnership with, Oracle is demonstrating its willingness to work with a former rival. With Oracle now integrating into its infrastructure, its mutual customers should benefit from being able to use Oracle infrastructure to run's CRM applications, while also using Oracle's financial and HR applications. The deal should provide synergy for both companies.

The bottom line
Cost-cutting, buybacks, and foregoing revenue growth at the expense of profit growth are noteworthy. However, IBM is going to need a couple of solid quarters in order to convince the market that its long-term earnings objectives aren't affecting the way it reacts to changing market conditions. This is the third quarter in a row in which IBM has given disappointing results, and the company is running out of excuses.

Don't let the revolution pass you by
Interested in the next tech revolution? Then you'll need to learn about the radical technology shift some say forced the mighty Bill Gates into a premature retirement. Meanwhile, early in-the-know investors are already getting filthy rich off of it... by quietly investing in the three companies that control its fortune-making future. You've likely heard of one of them, but you're probably never heard of the other two... to find out what they are, click here to watch this shocking video presentation!

The article Is IBM Compromising the Quality of Its Earnings? originally appeared on

Lee Samaha has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool owns shares of International Business Machines and Oracle.. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Copyright © 1995 - 2013 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Originally published