Congress Asked to Approve $404 Million Missile Sale to Korea

Congress Asked to Approve $404 Million Missile Sale to Korea

The U.S. Defense Security Cooperation Agency notified Congress Friday of plans to sell to the Republic of Korea Patriot air-defense missile systems in a defense contract that could be worth as much as $404 million to primary contractor Raytheon .

Specifically, DSCA says that the ROK is requesting that the U.S. sell it 112 Patriot Anti-Tactical Missiles (ATM) plus related test equipment, spare parts, and provide necessary personnel training, publications and technical data, U.S. Government and contractor technical and logistics support services, and other related elements of logistics support. At a date subsequent to this initial sale, DSCA anticipates that Korea will contract for upgrades to the purchased missiles, putting them in the "Guided Enhanced Missile-Tactical" (GEM-T) configuration through a Direct Commercial Sale from the contractor.

DSCA notes that this sale "will contribute to the foreign policy goals and national security objectives of the United States by meeting the legitimate security and defense needs of an ally and partner nation," providing the ROK with "an enhanced capability to defend against ballistic missile, aircraft and cruise missile threats."

DSCA further assures Congress that if approved, this defense contract "will not alter the basic military balance in the region." Nor will it have any "adverse impact on U.S. defense readiness."


The article Congress Asked to Approve $404 Million Missile Sale to Korea originally appeared on

Fool contributor Rich Smith has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool owns shares of Raytheon. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Copyright © 1995 - 2013 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Originally published