Google Beats Apple and Baidu to $1,000

Updated
Google Beats Apple and Baidu to $1,000

Google broke through $1,000 on Friday.

You've probably tired of hearing about this milestone. It's huge! It means nothing! Everyone's talking about it, but there doesn't seem to be a lot of agreement as to what it means exactly.

I guess one can say that I took it personally. I singled out four stocks that could get to $1,000 before Google back in February. It was a novel concept at the time, but the original article did find me on CNBC defending some of my choices.


I argued that homebuilder NVR , travel portal operator priceline.com , consumer tech giant Apple , and Chinese search engine leader Baidu could hit four figures before Google.

Two of the picks did beat Big G to the $1,000 club. NVR did it shortly after the article, but it was also the highest priced of the stocks. It didn't last. NVR eventually slipped below $1,000 -- where it remains today -- as investors have taken profits on real estate developers. NVR continues to grow, but it actually missed Wall Street's profit targets in its two most recent quarters.

I was right about Priceline, too. This was a gutsier call, since it was trading below $700 at the time. Google was breaking through $800. Priceline's healthy growth -- spearheaded more by the success of its international properties than its namesake "name your own price" site -- has delivered the kind of financial performance that investors don't mind paying up for.

The long shots at the time were Apple and Baidu, and they continue to trade well below $1,000. This doesn't mean that those stocks have been disappointments. Apple has only risen 13% in that time, but that's not too shabby for a company that has seen sales grow flat, profitability decline, and every product line outside of the iconic iPhone slip in popularity.

Baidu has held up far better. It's actually been the best performer of the five -- soaring 88% since the February article -- but it was also the only stock trading in double digits at the time. Making it into the triple digits was going to be a challenge, and it cleared it. It was naturally going to be a lot harder to break through $1,000.

Baidu has managed to bounce back as strong growth and a push into mobile have helped ease competitiveness concerns. However, it wasn't a realistic call. Then again, Baidu did declare a 10-for-1 split three years ago. So, in a sense, one can argue that it would've broken into the equivalent of four figures when it busted through the $100 barrier in May.

None of this should take away from Google's achievements. A strong quarterly report last week -- fueled by a huge uptick in the volume of paid clicks generated -- warranted the boost to the meaty milestone that NVR enjoyed temporarily, Priceline is now sharing, and Apple and Baidu will eventually hit if they continue to do things the right way.

Good tech translates into great gains
The amount of data we store every year is growing by a mind-boggling 60% annually! To make sense of this trend and pick out a winner, The Motley Fool has compiled a new report called "The Only Stock You Need to Profit From the NEW Technology Revolution." The report highlights a company that has gained 300% since first recommended by Fool analysts but still has plenty of room left to run. To get instant access to the name of this company transforming the IT industry, click here -- it's free.

The article Google Beats Apple and Baidu to $1,000 originally appeared on Fool.com.

Longtime Fool contributor Rick Munarriz has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends Apple, Baidu, Google, and Priceline.com. The Motley Fool owns shares of Apple, Baidu, Google, and Priceline.com. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Copyright © 1995 - 2013 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Originally published