Why Disney Buys All the Premium Character Collections It Can Find


Every so often, Walt Disney faces an uncomfortable dilemma. The copyright on Disney's most prized character, Mickey Mouse, won't last forever, and the expiration date is drawing close again. The Mouse is slated to enter the public domain in 2023.

That's why Disney spent $4.1 billion on Star Wars studio Lucasfilm last year. It's also a big reason behind the $4 billion Marvel deal in 2009. Mickey's copyright woes may even have played a part in the crucial 2006 buyout of Pixar for $7.6 billion.

Mickey Mouse doesn't exactly jump out and greet you at this Disney store. It's a sign of the times.

Disney CEO Bob Iger is busy constructing a framework of top-shelf characters to replace Mickey's iconic profile at the heart of the company. Buzz Lightyear can't do it alone, nor can Spider-Man or Wolverine. Even Luke Skywalker is a stretch.

So Disney is diversifying into a number of clearly defined niches. Each one comes with a central cast of characters that can carry Disney's branding flag when Mickey steps aside. In-house princesses from Snow White to Merida cater to a mostly young, female audience. Marvel's superheroes and villains do the heavy lifting for older boys, with Darth Vader and Yoda coming up behind them. The Pixar stable has something for everyone.

I don't know if you've noticed, but Mickey's stature is already shrinking. Disney hasn't even made a direct-to-video feature starring him since 2004. These days, the Mouse only stars in video games and Disney Channel TV shows. And it's for good reason. When Mickey's copyright expires in 2023 the market may (and probably will) be flooded with knock-offs. Disney also holds a fiercely protected trademark on Mickey, so nobody can pull off a complete rip-off job, but the iconic character may become fair game. Compare this to how anybody can make and sell adhesive bandages, but only Johnson & Johnson can use the Band-Aid brand.

Barring another miraculous fourth-quarter save, which doesn't seem likely this time, Disney needs to adjust to this upcoming legal reality. Mickey copies will be everywhere under a variety of new names, diluting the character's value.

But Disney plans to remain relevant and profitable, with or without Mickey Mouse in the spotlight. Disney became a Dow member in 1992, purely on the strength of its homebrew (and old public-domain) characters. The stock largely kept pace with its Dow peers in the early years of index membership, but it has absolutely crushed the Dow recently.

DIS Chart
DIS Chart

DIS data by YCharts.

That's Mickey's scheduled replacements flexing their muscles. I think they'll be more than ready when the baton is passed in 2018.

The World Can't Get Enough of Superheroes
Disney didn't just buy a future brand base in the Marvel deal, but also boosted its immediate business prospects in a big way. Super-powered movies have been some of the highest-grossing films of all time, and as these franchises continue to grow, the numbers are only going to get more impressive. The Motley Fool's new free report "Your Ticket to Cash In on the Superhero Battle of the Century" details what you need to know to profit from your favorite superheroes. Click here to read the full report!

The article Why Disney Buys All the Premium Character Collections It Can Find originally appeared on Fool.com.

Fool contributor Anders Bylund holds no position in any company mentioned. Check out Anders' bio and holdings or follow him on Twitter and Google+. The Motley Fool owns shares of Walt Disney. Motley Fool newsletter services have recommended buying shares of Johnson & Johnson and Walt Disney. Motley Fool newsletter services have recommended buying calls on Johnson & Johnson. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days.

Copyright © 1995 - 2013 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Originally published