Paying a Premium for Terrible Performance?

Paying a Premium for Terrible Performance?

It makes perfect sense to pay a premium for outstanding performance. Superior performers are rewarded in all walks of life from sports, to sales, to stock analysts. Unfortunately, some investors get so enamored with certain stocks that they continue to pay a premium even when the results no longer warrant the price they are paying. If you own BJ's Restaurants you need to look at the company's results and ask yourself, is this premium performance?

You have to read past the headlines
If you look at the BJ's Restaurants story, on the surface it seems like there is opportunity here. The company only operates about 136 restaurants, so in theory it has plenty of room to grow. Analysts are calling for EPS growth of better than 17% over the next few years as well.

However, when you dig a little deeper into the company's results, there are serious problems with this growth story. Not the least of these issues is that BJ's faces serious competition that has better name recognition, and in many cases superior financial performance as well.

Some of the companies that BJ's counts as competition are names like Brinker International , which owns the Chili's and Maggiano's chains. Darden Restaurants is another established competitor with names like Olive Garden and Red Lobster. In addition, it makes sense to compare BJ's Restaurants to faster-growing concepts like Buffalo Wild Wings .

One of the biggest issues with the BJ's story is the company's margins are significantly lower than their competition, and they are falling on a year-over-year basis. Among their peers, Brinker leads the way with a recent operating margin of 10.68%. Darden's established network of restaurants performed well with a margin of 8.4%, and even Buffalo Wild Wings managed a margin of 7.88%.

By comparison, BJ's was only able to post a margin of 5.9% in the current quarter. To make matters worse, this was down from a 6.8% margin last year. The main culprit was the company's occupancy, and operating expenses increased from 20.5% of total sales last year to 21.6% of total sales this year. This increase could mean that BJ's is paying too much for its new locations, or that the company isn't being aggressive enough in negotiating better terms for its current leases. In either case, BJ's margin woes are a red flag for the chain.

Lower margins = lower cash flow
It's pretty simple to understand that a business with lower margins will more often than not produce lower free cash flow than a competitor with better margins. It should come as no surprise that BJ's lower margins meant a significantly worse cash flow profile than their peers.

To compare companies' cash flow statements, using core free cash flow per dollar of sales gives us a good apples-to-apples comparison. Core free cash flow strips away some of the accounting changes and uses just net income, plus depreciation, minus capital expenditures. By comparing core free cash flow to sales, we can see how efficiently the company turns sales into cash that can be used by the business.

Using this metric, we find again that Brinker International sits on top of the hill with $0.22 of free cash flow per dollar of sales. Buffalo Wild Wings generates about $0.03 of free cash flow, but Darden's heavy debt load hurts the company's performance, and they generate just $0.01 of free cash flow per dollar of sales. Unfortunately for BJ's investors, the company not only was core free cash flow negative in the current quarter, but the company has been negative on average over the last four quarters.

Terrible performance and overvalued at the same time
It's one thing if a company struggles with low margins and negative cash flow yet sells at a discount to its peers. However, in BJ's Restaurants' case the stock sells for a significant premium to their competition.

If we use the PEG+Y ratio, we can compare these companies' valuations including their dividend yields. PEG+Y simply takes the P/E ratio and divides it by the combination of the company's yield and expected growth rate.

Using this measure, Brinker seems like the best value with a PEG+Y of 0.92, due to the company's 2.36% yield and 13.6% growth rate compared to a forward P/E of 14.75. Darden seems a bit expensive with a PEG+Y of 1.44, and its 4.7% yield isn't enough to offset the 15.4 P/E ratio and lackluster 6% expected growth. Buffalo Wild Wings carries a PEG+Y of 1.6, but the company's growth recently has been very strong.

BJ's investors are currently paying a PEG+Y of 1.8, which doesn't seem warranted based on the company's results. Just because this could be a great growth story, doesn't mean the stock warrants a forward P/E north of 31. This growth story isn't delivering piping hot earnings, but investors who aren't paying attention could end up getting burned.

Profiting from our increasingly global economy can be as easy as investing in your own backyard. The Motley Fool's free report "3 American Companies Set to Dominate the World" shows you how. Click here to get your free copy before it's gone.

The article Paying a Premium for Terrible Performance? originally appeared on

Chad Henage has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends BJ's Restaurants and Buffalo Wild Wings. The Motley Fool owns shares of BJ's Restaurants, Buffalo Wild Wings, and Darden Restaurants. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Copyright © 1995 - 2013 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.