Will Hedging Mean Ruin for This Natural Gas Company?


Don't be ashamed if you're still scratching your head trying to figure out the deal Exco Resources just completed. The moving parts for that deal involved a multitude of exploration and production companies, investment banks, and private equity firms. Now that it's complete, though, there is one aspect that could prove to be very troublesome going forward: Exco's forced hedging policy. Let's take a look at this policy and how it could be a problem for the company.

Source: WPX Energy investor relations.

For those who missed Exco's deal with Chesapeake Energy earlier this year, the company acquired net 55,000 acres in the Eagle Ford and 9,600 acres in the Haynesville shale for about $1 billion. As a company that, at the time, had only $1.6 billion in total assets, there were lots of financial wrangling to make the deal happen. Most notably, it turned around and sold half of its equity stake in the undeveloped acreage of the Eagle Ford to Kohlberg Kravis Roberts on the condition that Exco would buy the stake back at fair market value once wells have been completed and flowing for one year.

Another aspect of the deal that was stipulated by Exco's lenders is that the company hedge 80% of its production every year until 2015. Much like the farming out of the developing of unproved assets in the Eagle Ford, this was done as a way to assure the financial backers of this deal that the company would be able to meet its obligations. By locking in pricing for its gas and oil, the revenue stream should be more predictable. The combination of the KKR well pledge and the hedging contract, though, could prove troublesome for the company

Getting pulled in separate directions
Exco is contractually obligated to purchase any well from KKR at its 10-year net present value starting in the summer of 2014. This valuation will be based on spot prices for benchmark crudes such as West Texas Intermediate or Light Louisiana Sweet. At the same time, the price for a majority of its production is already locked in to 2015. With the purchase price floating and the selling price fixed over this time period, it is very possible that high oil prices would mean the company is buying back its share of the KKR wells at a premium while it is selling at less than market value because of the forced hedge position for as long as 18 months.

On the flip side of the coin, KKR actually reserves the right to keep the wells if it so desires. This event would probably occur if oil prices are low and KKR believes that it can get a better price down the road for those assets. So despite the fact that the company could be enjoying a premium on its products thanks to this long hedging strategy, it would not be able to get back its wells at a discounted price.

Of the two scenarios, rising oil prices is a greater threat to Exco. Oil and gas companies will want to hedge large portions of its production in an declining price environment. Where they believe the price will be greater than what they can write a futures contract for, though, companies try to keep an "open" position to take advantage of those higher spot prices down the road.

Based on the moves of some of Exco's peers, this is more likely to happen. During Ultra Petroleum's most recent conference call, management stated that it is keeping much of its gas production open because it sees greater upside potential to gas prices. Also, WPX Energy has only hedged 19% and 46% of its anticipated 2014 natural gas and oil production, respectively. With its peers going in the opposite direction of Exco, it is not far-fetched to question how the next few months will turn out for the company.

What a Fool believes
While there are certainly some concerns regarding how this deal will shake out and how Exco will handle the debt it took on to make it happen, there are some very good things to like about this deal. It netted the company a strong, oil-heavy acreage position in one of the fastest-growing shale plays in the U.S., and it helped to add some balance to its previously gas-heavy production mix. As next summer rolls around, though, keep an eye on oil prices and how they relate to the company's hedging position as it will be a big determinant on its bottom line.

Companies all across the energy space are affected by the price of oil in a different way. To help you unravel the complexities of the energy space, our top analysts have put together a special report that reveals the dynamics of the price of oil and three companies that are best suited for today's prices. Simply click here and we'll give you free access to this valuable report.

The article Will Hedging Mean Ruin for This Natural Gas Company? originally appeared on Fool.com.

Fool contributor Tyler Crowe has no position in any stocks mentioned. You can follow him at Fool.com under the handle TMFDirtyBird, on Google +, or on Twitter, @TylerCroweFool.The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Ultra Petroleum and has the following options: long January 2014 $30 calls on Chesapeake Energy, long January 2014 $30 calls on Ultra Petroleum, long January 2014 $40 calls on Ultra Petroleum, and long January 2014 $50 calls on Ultra Petroleum. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Copyright © 1995 - 2013 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Originally published