Iconic tablets have been getting cheaper this summer.
Amazon.com cut the price of its Kindle Fire HD by $40 last week. The 20% haircut lowers the price to a mere $159. Earlier this month, Microsoft gave its high-end Surface Pro tablet a $100 markdown. The move came three weeks after slashing the price of its Surface RT by as much as 30% to start at $349.
The moves are likely taking place for entirely different reasons. The Surface RT isn't selling, so this could be Microsoft's last-ditch effort to make it work before shelving the whole Windows RT experiment. The Surface Pro isn't going anywhere. It's based on Windows 8, and Microsoft has everything riding on its flagship operating system. The Surface Pro was just too expensive, and this helps make it a more compelling purchase. The Kindle Fire HD price cut -- which is being billed as a "limited time" price break -- is probably Amazon's way to clear out its inventory ahead of an update in the coming weeks or months.
Then we get to Apple . Apple has never budged from its $499 price on its its current generation iPad. It has been willing to compromise, though. We got the cheaper bite-sized iPad Mini. Apple does keep older models around at lower price points.
Judging by its pricing, one would think that Apple is immune to the price wars that are taking place around it. Reality paints another picture. Apple's share of the tablet market, according to industry tracker IDC, fell to 32% during the this past quarter from 60% a year earlier. That's not very encouraging, and the quarter ended just before Microsoft and Amazon began making their devices even cheaper.
Are iPad price cuts coming? Will next month's reported iPhone event also serve as a platform to aggressively price the tablet that defined the market before succumbing to the Android invasion?
Why not? Apple is already suffering through the symptoms of a company slashing prices. Margins have been contracting in recent quarters, and average selling prices of its tablets have been heading lower since the iPad Mini release and Apple's decision to keep older models around at more accessible prices.
Anchoring the new iPads at $499 is a moral victory at this point, but it's not a real one.
A price cut didn't seem necessary when Android tablets began hitting the market at prices that cost less than half as much as the iPad. No one wanting to buy an iPad would settle for the Android ecosystem. However, that line has been blurring. That's an opinion, but it's backed by the fact that Apple was commanding two-thirds of the market at the beginning of last year, and now it's accounting for less than a third of the world's tablet shipments.
Everyone may have different reasons for moving their prices lower, but Apple can't afford to ignore the situation. The last thing investors want is to see a fiscal coroner report in a few years that the iPad suffered a death by a thousand cuts -- and none of them self-inflicted.
The tech world has been thrown into chaos as the biggest titans -- including Microsoft and Apple -- invade one another's turf. At stake is the future of a trillion-dollar revolution: mobile. To find out which of these giants is set to dominate the next decade, we've created a free report called "Who Will Win the War Between the 5 Biggest Tech Stocks?" Inside, you'll find out which companies are set to dominate and give in-the-know investors an edge. To grab a copy of this report, simply click here -- it's free!
The article Will Apple Pay for Amazon and Microsoft's Price Cuts? originally appeared on Fool.com.
Longtime Fool contributor Rick Munarriz has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends Amazon.com and Apple. The Motley Fool owns shares of Amazon.com, Apple, and Microsoft. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Copyright © 1995 - 2013 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.