Why the Dow Should Have Ended Higher Than It Did Last Week

Last week the Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 99.53 points, or 0.64%. The index set new all-time record highs during a number of the days last week and currently sits at a new high at 15,658.36. But the Dow should have ended the week much higher than it did. Only seven of the 30 components ended the session lower, while the other 23 moved higher. Of those 23, 12 climbed by more than 1% -- and eight of those 12 increased more than 2%. Among those seven losers, six moved lower by more than 1%, and only two dropped more than 2%.

So what happened? The problem was that some of the Dow's most heavily weighted stocks were the big decliners, while some of the more lightly weighted ones were the top winners. Chevron , ExxonMobil , and Verizon, the Dow's biggest losers last week, fell by a respective 2.04%, 2.99%, and 1.5% -- and combined, those stocks carry 13.1% of the Dow's total weight.

Meanwhile, the index's top three winners -- DuPont, Cisco, and Hewlett-Packard -- rose a respective 3.92%, 2.7%, and 3.88%, but together they account for just 5.54% of the index.

Furthermore, the Dow's most heavily weighted stock, IBM , lost 1.11% this week. Combine that with all the Dow's losers this past week (the others were Alcoa, Intel, and Coca-Cola), and you get an index weighting of 26.17%. But with no weighting, seven stocks out of 30 would account for just 23.33% of the index.

In short, the Dow's weighting system kept it from reaching even greater all-time highs.

Many of my colleagues have spoken on the subject of trying to find a better alternative to the Dow's weighting system. Many would argue that the S&P 500's system -- which goes by each stock's market capitalization -- is better than the Dow's system, which assigns weighting by stock price alone. The problem is that even the S&P 500 misses out on the dividends investors receive and how those payments affect the overall return of a stock or the market in general.

One thing investors can do if they want dividends added into their calculations for market growth is to follow the Standard & Poor's Total Return Index, which takes those quarterly payments into account.

In the end, all weighting systems have their problems, but understanding their limitations can at least help you see why indexes like the Dow don't always perform the way you might expect them to. But these systems are the best we have, and for better or worse, we're probably stuck with them.

More Foolish insight
Are you part of the 99%? The Motley Fool's new free report highlights three less-than-luxurious stocks the 1% may be overlooking. Just click here to read it now.

The article Why the Dow Should Have Ended Higher Than It Did Last Week originally appeared on Fool.com.

Fool contributor Matt Thalman has no position in any stocks mentioned. Check back Monday through Friday as Matt explains what caused the Dow's winners and losers of the day, and every Saturday for a weekly recap. Follow Matt on Twitter: @mthalman5513. The Motley Fool recommends Chevron, Cisco Systems, Coca-Cola, and Intel and owns shares of Intel and IBM. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Copyright © 1995 - 2013 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.