Who's Not Happy With One Microsoft?

Who's Not Happy With One Microsoft?

On the heels of a sweeping internal restructuring, Microsoft has rallied to new 52-week highs on investor confidence in the new organizational hierarchy that may help combat the overarching bureaucracy that's held back the software giant for years. Steve Ballmer outlined his vision of "One Microsoft," one that would be unified.

Investors may be impressed, but there's another important group of stakeholders that's decidedly not: channel partners.

The changes were announced on the last day of Microsoft's Worldwide Partner Conference, or WPC, its annual gathering of business partners, resellers, systems integrators, and channel distributors. CRN details the backlash among a wide range of these partners, who are none too pleased about some aspects of Microsoft's new strategic direction. These channel partners are incredibly important to Microsoft's sales into the IT departments in the small and medium business, or SMB, market.

The dominant theme behind the restructuring is Microsoft's ambitions of becoming an integrated devices-and-services company, which inevitably puts it in direct competition with its partners on a number of fronts. Some believe that Microsoft is becoming too focused on what Apple and Google are doing, and that all of the company's products are now mere competitive responses.

For instance, COO Kevin Turner encouraged partners to bring their clients into Microsoft's own retail stores where they could buy Surface tablets directly from Microsoft. That's like asking middlemen to actively cut themselves out of the equation.

The vast majority of these resellers aren't allowed to sell Surface, either, as Microsoft recently detailed its plans to expand Surface distribution. The problem is that the company is allowing only 10 of its large account resellers, or LARs, to offer the device. That's just 0.01% of its total partner base in North America. That inevitably leads to a situation where some resellers may be forced to buy Surface units from larger competitors if they want to offer the tablet. Some of these channel partners have instead simply decided to offer competing tablets from Apple, Samsung, Hewlett-Packard, or Dell.

Microsoft's new distribution strategy is to emphasize its own first-party retail network to sell to consumers, while leveraging its LARs for the big enterprise wins. The SMB segment is getting left out in the cold. One reseller exec even said he "went ballistic" after reading Ballmer's memo.

Unfortunately, many of these systems integrators have little choice but to play ball. Microsoft is the only meaningful platform that they can sell into the enterprise. Still, that doesn't mean that Microsoft should leverage its domineering position and drag its partners along, kicking and screaming. Nothing good will come of that.

It's incredible to think just how much of our digital and technological lives are almost entirely shaped and molded by just a handful of companies like Microsoft. Find out "Who Will Win the War Between the 5 Biggest Tech Stocks?" in The Motley Fool's latest free report, which details the knock-down, drag-out battle being waged by the five kings of tech. Click here to keep reading.

The article Who's Not Happy With One Microsoft? originally appeared on Fool.com.

Fool contributor Evan Niu, CFA, owns shares of Apple. The Motley Fool recommends Apple and Google. The Motley Fool owns shares of Apple, Google, and Microsoft. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Copyright © 1995 - 2013 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.