Alcoa a Bellwether ... for China?

Alcoa a Bellwether ... for China?

The official unofficial beginning of earnings season has long been considered the report from Alcoa , with the news setting the early tone for the broader market. As the company's market capitalization has fallen, and with it its influence, many have begun to wonder if the aluminum maker's earnings release is still a meaningful event in the larger context. With commodities having skidded for the first half of the year already, this perception is as prevalent as ever.

While the importance of Alcoa's numbers may have been called into question for setting the outlook for the U.S. -- although there is an argument that the aluminum market is a solid indicator for the automotive sector -- the impact of the results as a leading indicator for China may be on the rise. The country represents the largest driver of growth for Alcoa across a number of critical sectors. With the Chinese consumer price index rising more than expected, some have speculated that government stimulus may contract -- strong growth projections from the company suggest that the Chinese economy is on solid footing.

The numbers
Excluding one-time events, Alcoa reported earnings of $0.07 per share, beating expectations of $0.06 per share. Revenues also narrowly beat consensus estimates of $5.83 billion, coming in at $5.85 billion. Perhaps most notable was the company's forecasts on demand for the rest of the year. While automotive demand is expected to rise between 1% and 4%, U.S. demand was raised slightly higher at 2% to 5%. Aerospace demand is expected to rise 9% to 10% and construction demand by 4% to 5%. Overall, Alcoa sees an uptick in global demand of 7%, which should have some offsetting effect on the continued weak prices in the sector.

To put these numbers in perspective relative to China, CEO Klaus Kleinfeld explained during the earnings call that demand in China is a critical element across sectors. Forecast demand growth for the automotive sector is 7% to 10%, while it's 12% to 16% for the aerospace segment, and between 8% and 10% for commercial building and construction. The company also pointed out that Chinese aluminum stocks are down 99,000 metric tons since the end of the first quarter and that consumption has driven non-strategic reserves down by 399,000 metric tons. With demand numbers remaining high, the outlook for China seems to remain in place. It's important to remember that a significant portion of infrastructure spending in China is government-backed.

The takeaway
While the numbers from Alcoa were better than expected, they aren't the stuff investors' dreams are made from. Like many commodities-backed concerns, the stock and the company have come under pressure. Alcoa appears to be improving its outlook, but it still has a fair way to go. Relative to diversified plays such as BHP Billiton or Vale , it's hard to see a great argument for Alcoa. Both BHP and Vale trade at a lower price-to-earnings multiple than Alcoa -- 16.2 and 14.6, relative to 34.5. BHP has an operating margin of 30%, Vale operates at 29%, and Alcoa is at 3%. Finally, with Alcoa offering a dividend yield of 1.5% relative to 5.9% for BHP and 4.5% for Vale, the income argument is also against Alcoa.

Ultimately, Alcoa provides some valuable insights into the position and health of China, but it hasn't sufficiently turned the corner to warrant a major allocation in most portfolios. If the company can continue to improve, it may become a core name again, but that's probably several quarters away.

The article Alcoa a Bellwether ... for China? originally appeared on

Fool contributor Doug Ehrman has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool owns shares of Vale. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Copyright © 1995 - 2013 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.