Though I am definitely a value investing advocate, there are simply times when basic value concepts like fair value and margin of safety fail to provide useful conclusions in analysis. Case in point: the valuation of a fast-growing business like LinkedIn . To illustrate, I'll attempt to find LinkedIn's fair value and its margin of safety.
Meteoric growth is hard to estimate
LinkedIn's first-quarter revenue increased by 72% from the year-ago quarter. That's impressive. Yet it presents a serious problem for value investors.
Value investors, of course, seek out the intrinsic value of a business. And forecasting growth rates for the business going forward is central to any valuation of an ongoing business. But LinkedIn's current high growth rates make forecasting the next several years very difficult. High growth rates present investors with extremely high levels of uncertainty. Difficult questions arise: When will the decline in growth rates begin? To what degree will it unfold? The answers to these two questions will drastically affect valuation.
Sure, year-over-year revenue growth rates have topped 85% in each of the past three years, making LinkedIn's high growth rates pretty consistent. But this doesn't mean we can expect revenue to grow by exceptional rates over the next several years, or even next year for that matter.
For instance, in each of the last three years, Apple's revenue and EPS year-over-year growth rates topped 44%. But in the trailing 12 months, EPS is up only 1.8% from the year before. Who could have seen that coming? Apple shares have fallen right along with growth rates, trading more than 40% lower than they were about nine months ago. Apple is no longer a growth stock. In fact, at today's prices, it could make an excellent value investing candidate or even be considered a worthy dividend stock.
What is LinkedIn worth?
Ignoring the notion that growth stocks are tough to value, let's give LinkedIn a proper shot at a valuation.
Consider two different scenarios. In Scenario A, LinkedIn manages to increase free cash flow by 50% next year, followed by growth rates that decelerate by about 10% annually for the next nine years.
Given these assumptions, a discounted cash flow valuation yields a fair value of about $197 for LinkedIn shares, giving shares about an 11% margin of safety at today's price around $177.
But in Scenario B, things don't go quite as well. Free cash flow growth rates decelerate by 15% every year.
This scenario also seems realistic. Yet now investors face a conundrum. If a scenario like this unfolds, a better estimate of the fair value of LinkedIn's shares is $132, based on a discounted cash flow valuation. In other words, shares would be about 33% overvalued at today's price.
We could also explore a Scenario C, in which growth rates in excess of 40% are sustained for more than five years. In this case, LinkedIn shares would be grossly undervalued.
Herein lies the problem with applying the concepts of value investing to stocks like LinkedIn. Slight changes in estimated growth rates for these fast-growing companies present an uncomfortably wide range of fair value estimates, leaving value investors with nothing more than a headache.
So does this mean stocks like LinkedIn do not make the grade as an investment? Not necessarily. Another way to add some context to the stock is to look at the company's addressable market.
LinkedIn's largest operating segment, recruiting, accounts for about 57% of revenue. And fortunately for investors, the segment is plush with opportunity. There's an estimated field of 200,000 corporate clients, and only about 18,000 use LinkedIn. Its recruiting segment already appears to be on a path of massive market share gains, with the segment's revenue up 80% in the first quarter of 2013 from the year-ago quarter.
In other words, LinkedIn's addressable market is huge.
Does LinkedIn's huge addressable market imply the stock is undervalued? No, but it does present a new way to look at its opportunities.
We have to face the fact that there's just no excellent way to find the fair value of the shares of fast growing companies like LinkedIn. Investors brave enough to put their money in these stocks should do so only with a very strong conviction of the company's competitive advantage and its addressable market. A plan to hold for a very long time is essential because the astronomic valuations pinned to stocks like these will most likely be accompanied by very volatile price swings.
Typical value investing methods may not always work. Even when they don't, there's no reason to turn a cold shoulder on a stock. Instead, change your approach and tread carefully.
This incredible tech stock is growing twice as fast as Google and Facebook, and more than three times as fast as Amazon.com and Apple. Watch our jaw-dropping investor alert video today to find out why The Motley Fool's chief technology officer is putting $117,238 of his own money on the table -- and why he's so confident this will be a huge winner in 2013 and beyond. Just click here to watch!
The article When Value Investing Fails originally appeared on Fool.com.
Fool contributor Daniel Sparks has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Amazon.com, Apple, Facebook, Google, and LinkedIn. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Copyright © 1995 - 2013 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.