Colorado is currently experiencing the most devastating fire in its history. Five hundred and two homes have been lost, approximately 14,198 acres have burned, two people have died, and the fire is still not out. But in the midst of this tragedy, many businesses have stepped up to help; Wild Fire Tees, a company started specifically because of last year's Waldo Canyon fire -- again located in Colorado -- is donating 100% of its profits to wildfire victims.
With the outpouring of support, and given the scope of the devastation, it might surprise you to learn that one company initially told a fire victim that he had to pay for the satellite-TV equipment that was burned during the fire. More importantly, this isn't the first time this company has taken such a stance. I'm talking about DIRECTV . Here's what you need to know.
You've got to be kidding me
Jeremy Beach's home is gone, burned to the ground by the Black Forest Fire. Luckily, he escaped with his wife -- who is 37 weeks pregnant with twins, his 5-year-old son, and two dogs. When he got the news his home had burned, Jeremy told the TheGazette that he started making calls to cancel his services, including cable, utilities, and trash. However, when he contacted DIRECTV, they told him he owes the company $400 for the burned satellite dish and receivers.
This news is shocking, but it's not unpredictable when it comes to DIRECTV. During the Waldo Canyon fire, which destroyed 347 homes, TheGazette reported that DIRECTV also charged fire victims for burned equipment. A spokeswoman for DIRECTV told the Gazette that they decided to charge customers because most people's insurance would cover the cost. While that may sound like a valid argument, to victims of the fire, and the surrounding community, the explanation left consumers angry.
It's pretty obvious that businesses shouldn't alienate the customers they rely on for profits. As such, DIRECTV's reported position could cause investors concern, as comments on TheGazette's article, and across social media, show that consumers in Colorado are irate, stating that they intend to cancel their subscriptions ASAP.
The negative backlash created such a stir that DIRECTV issued an apology to the fire victim and said it'd do everything it could to help. It also stated: "DIRECTV has a clear policy that fully supports its customers during natural disasters that includes replacement of damaged equipment at no charge, long-term suspensions of accounts for customers who must leave their home, and waiving cancellation fees for those who need to disconnect service."
Colorado may hate it, but is DIRECTV still a good investment?
DIRECTV's apology is a step in the right direction, but comments from consumers show that there's still widespread anger against DIRECTV dating back to the Waldo Canyon fire. More pointedly, Colorado residents aren't the only ones to show dissatisfaction with DIRECTV.
In 2012, DIRECTV was rated No. 14 in Business Insider's "15 Most Disliked Companies in America" list. True, that's not as bad as Cox Communications at No.7, Time Warner Cable at No. 6, or Comcast at No. 4, but it's not great, either.
However, DIRECTV has a few things going for it. One, it's definitely ahead of its competition when it comes to consumer satisfaction. According to the latest report from the American Consumer Satisfaction Index, DIRECTV improved its customer satisfaction rating by 5.9% from the previous year. Also, when it comes to cable providers, DIRECTV has an overall score of 72, which is second only to FiOS operator Verizon Communications' score of 73.
Two, DIRECTV has continued to have strong financials: Among other positive trends, according to its first-quarter 2013 results, DIRECTV grew net subscribers by 604,000 and revenue by 8%, and its average monthly subscriber churn stayed pretty much the same, going from 1.44% for the three months ended March 2012 to 1.45% for that same period in 2013.
What to watch for
DIRECTV's initial response to Colorado's wildfire victim is concerning and points to a need for improvement. It's especially concerning given that this is the second time DIRECTV has responded in such a fashion. Yes, DIRECTV is ahead of most cable providers right now, and it has strong financials, but if it continues to alienate customers, that could change. Consequently, investors would do well to continue monitoring customer satisfaction and subscription rates. If either takes a turn for the worse, that could be a bad sign for future investment profits.
The Motley Fool's chief investment officer has selected his No. 1 stock for the next year. Find out which stock it is in the special free report: "The Motley Fool's Top Stock for 2013." Just click here to access the report and find out the name of this under-the-radar company.
The article DIRECTV Comes Under Fire in Colorado originally appeared on Fool.com.
Fool contributor Katie Spence has no position in any stocks mentioned. Follow her on Twitter: @TMFKSpence. The Motley Fool recommends DIRECTV. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Copyright © 1995 - 2013 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.