3 Biotech Companies You Should Have Bought This Year
Biotech companies can make you rich if you buy the right ones at the right time. They can also make you poor; but let's not dwell on the negative.
If you'd owned these three biotech companies at the beginning of the year, you're sitting on around a triple compared to a relatively smaller-but-still-impressive 34% increase in the Nasdaq Biotechnology Index.
Let's take a look at what's driven the biotech companies to increase in price and whether they're still a buy at the new price.
This isn't crazy
ACADIA Pharmaceuticals spiked in April after the Food and Drug Administration threw the biotech company a bone and said ACADIA wouldn't have to run a second phase 3 trial for pimavanserin in patients with Parkinson's disease psychosis.
The move was a double bonus because it reduced the time it'll take to get pimavanserin on the market and eliminated the chance of a failure in the second phase 3 trial. While the drug passed its most recent phase 3 trial just fine, the symptoms of Parkinson's disease psychosis are somewhat subjective. Knowing that the drug worked in a phase 3 trial already could increase the placebo effect, making it hard to repeat the results. Now ACADIA doesn't have to.
We've got a blockbuster
Aegerion Pharmaceuticals' big spike in mid-May came after management said at a Bank of America Merrill Lynch health-care conference that its cholesterol-lowering drug Juxtapid could have a $1 billion market for the genetic disease it treats. Analysts quickly regurgitated the biotech company's assertions, increasing their price targets accordingly.
Claiming blockbuster potential isn't exactly a revolutionary thing for a biotech company to say. It seems like almost every orphan-drug maker arrives at the annual price of its drug by dividing $1 billion by the number of patients it thinks exist.
And Aegerion has to compete with Sanofi and Isis Pharmaceuticals' Kynamro, which is approved for the same genetic disorder. Juxtapid is arguably a better drug with a better side-effect profile. It can also be taken orally, while Kynamro needs to be injected. Still, I think it's unreasonable to expect Aegerion to capture the entire market.
MannKind's rise doesn't appear to be due to anything that the biotech company has done, but what investors expect the company will do in the future. Specifically, investors are anticipating the release of data this summer for its phase 3 trials testing inhaled insulin Afrezza.
The FDA made the company run new trials after it improved the device that delivers the insulin, but since the underlying drug hasn't changed, it seems extremely likely that the drug will meet its clinical endpoints.
The bigger risk is whether doctors will prescribe Afrezza and whether MannKind can find a big pharma partner to help the biotech company change the paradigm of diabetes treatment. An uphill battle for sure.
Aegerion and MannKind looked like much better deals before their run-ups this year. I don't see how their respective news -- or lack thereof -- makes the biotech companies worth nearly triple what they were valued at the beginning of the year.
ACADIA is arguably worth more since it's less risky and should be profitable sooner, but an FDA approval is still two years away, so there doesn't seem to be any rush to jump into the biotech company anytime soon.
The future of MannKind?
Will MannKind's disruptive technology revolutionize the way diabetes is treated around the world -- or will the FDA put the kibosh on this product before it even hits the market? In a new premium research report on MannKind, these complex issues are made crystal clear, in addition to showing you why to buy or sell the stock today. To find out more, click here to grab your copy today.
The article 3 Biotech Companies You Should Have Bought This Year originally appeared on Fool.com.Fool contributor Brian Orelli has no position in any stocks mentioned, and neither does The Motley Fool. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.