FDA Throws ACADIA a Juicy Bone


There goes the short-term bear thesis on ACADIA Pharmaceuticals .

I had recommended staying away from the company for now because it looked too risky with a long wait before the company could complete its second phase 3 trial for pimavanserin in patients with Parkinson's disease psychosis.

But after talking to the Food and Drug Administration, ACADIA said today that the agency has agreed that the current data is "sufficient to support the filing of a New Drug Application." That doesn't guarantee the FDA is going to approve the drug, but it's certainly a positive sign.

The FDA generally requires at least two successful phase 3 trials, but will accept a single trial in certain instances when there's an unmet need. There aren't any drugs approved to treat Parkinson's disease psychosis, although atypical antipsychotics such as Johnson & Johnson's Risperdal, Eli Lilly's Zyprexa, Bristol-Myers Squibb's Abilify, and Pfizer's Geodon are used off label to treat Parkinson's patients experiencing psychotic symptoms, which affects up to 60% of Parkinson's patients.

Shares of ACADIA are up more than 50% as I write this. That's well deserved.

Not having to do the study should speed things up a little -- ACADIA hadn't even started the second phase 3 trial -- but not by the full length of the trial. There are still drug-drug interaction studies and chemistry and manufacturing tests that need to be completed; the company doesn't expect to file the marketing application until near the end of next year.

So, why are shares up so much? Not having to run a confirmatory trial reduces the risk substantially.

Pimavanserin produced solid data in its most recent trial. Patients taking the drug saw their SAPS-PD score, a measurement of hallucinations and delusions, drop by 5.79 points while scores for placebo patients only dropped 2.73 points. The difference was statistically significant.

But this wasn't the first trial testing pimavanserin, or even the second. ACADIA ran two previous trials, which both saw patients in the placebo group improve substantially based on the assessment scale. For the latest successful trial, the company modified the scale -- that's the PD in SAPS-PD -- to include the nine items most relevant to patients with psychosis associated with Parkinson's disease.

The modification clearly worked, but there are no guarantees that it could be repeated. Patients entering the confirmatory trial would know that the drug had succeeded, which could boost the scores of the placebo patients.

So, is ACADIA a buy now? With the risk removed, it's more appealing, but you have to be willing to wait. We're still a year and a half away from filing the application, and then there's another eight to 12 months before pimavanserin will be approved.

With a market cap of $950 million, there's some room to run once the drug hits the market in 2015. Pimavanserin shouldn't have too much trouble taking away sales from Risperdal, Zyprexa, Abilify, Geodon, and the like since it'll be approved for the indication and the others aren't. More importantly, pimavanserin doesn't seem to affect motor skills of Parkinson's patients as much as the atypical antipsychotics do.

The bear thesis may be gone, but unfortunately, it's going to take a long time to prove the bull thesis correct.

Another biotech looking for an FDA approval
Will MannKind's disruptive technology revolutionize the way diabetes is treated around the world -- or will the FDA put the kibosh on this product before it even hits the market? In a new premium research report on MannKind, these complex issues are made crystal clear, in addition to showing you why to buy or sell the stock today. To find out more click here to grab your copy today.

The article FDA Throws ACADIA a Juicy Bone originally appeared on Fool.com.

Fool contributor Brian Orelli has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends Johnson & Johnson. The Motley Fool owns shares of Johnson & Johnson. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Copyright © 1995 - 2013 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.