Dell has offered its three suitors millions to cover bid expenses, but with caveats. For activist investor Carl Icahn, who is the last suitor and holds the highest bid of more than $15.60 per share, this means he has to be very un-Carl Icahn-like in his proposal. Clearly, the Dell special committee wants this process to go down smoothly, without proxy battles and costly litigation. Where are we with the Dell takeover, and should investors believe Icahn's estimate that comes in north of $20 per share for the company?
As has been widely reported by now, the Dell sale has attracted three bids in its "go shop" period, which concluded at the end of last month. The first player is founder and current CEO Michael Dell, who has partnered with private-equity firm Silver Lake Partners to offer $13.65 per share -- valuing the company at $24.4 billion. The stock trades over $14 today.
The second suitor is private-equity group Blackstone. As mentioned in a prior article, Blackstone stepped into the ring with an interesting card -- former Hewlett-Packard executive Mark Hurd. The firm believes Hurd, not Dell (the human), could bring Dell (the company) back to relevance as he did with his former employer. Blackstone's offer came in higher than Michael Dell's at $14.25 per share.
The third and final suitor, as mentioned, is Icahn and his holding company, Icahn Enterprises . As usual, Icahn is the wild card in the bunch, vowing to take the company on via proxy fights and lawsuits if he doesn't get what he wants. Icahn Enterprises currently owns roughly 100 million shares -- or more than $1.4 billion worth of Dell stock. He also leads the pack with a bid of $15.65 per share. Before his bid, the investor publicly expressed his opinion that the company is worth more than $22 per share.
What's a special committee to do?
Pay for play
Dell's committee is paying all three parties millions of dollars to cover their due diligence -- which may seem a little odd, but it sounds to me like they just don't want to beleaguer the issue. It's apparently a very peaceful, generous committee.
For Carl Icahn and Icahn Enterprises, the gift package comes in at $25 million. This good gesture came with a note, and one that I can't imagine reads well on Icahn's desk.
Specifically, the committee chastised Icahn as having "threatened the Company's directors with 'years of litigation' and a proxy fight if they do not conduct the transaction process in the manner" he prefers. Basically, if Carl Icahn acts like Carl Icahn during this process, he will not be gifted the $25 million, and the committee will be very upset.
Sounds like cannon fodder for the king of corporate raiding.
Looking at the market price, which hovers above Michael Dell's offer and below those of the other two, investors and analysts seem to take everyone's offer lightly. Is Michael Dell selling his shareholders short with the offer? According to the market, other offers, and Icahn's original valuation of $22.81, the answer appears to be yes.
We don't know which way the committee will sway, or what will happen once it does. As has been the case for years now, investors are wise to stay away from Dell.
More from The Motley Fool
To learn about two retailers with especially good prospects, take a look at The Motley Fool's special free report: "The Death of Wal-Mart: The Real Cash Kings Changing the Face of Retail." In it, you'll see how these two cash kings are able to consistently outperform and how they're planning to ride the waves of retail's changing tide. You can access it by clicking here.
The article Dell Tries to Pacify a Hungry Icahn originally appeared on Fool.com.
Fool contributor Michael Lewis and The Motley Fool have no position in any of the stocks mentioned. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Copyright © 1995 - 2013 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.