Supreme Court: Sorry, Airlines, You Have to Tell the Whole Story
It seems that the Supreme Court is siding with the adage that my grandparents repeated to me over and over again as a child: Honesty is the best policy.
Earlier this week, the nation's highest court decided that it would not be hearing a case brought on by Southwest Airlines , Allegiant Air, and Spirit Airlines . At issue were certain aspects of the Airfare Advertising Rules put in place by the U.S. Department of Transportation back in early 2012. Specifically, the rules state that all government taxes need to be included in the advertised fares of air carriers.
Upon news of the Court's decision, shares of all three companies took a tumble, with Spirit's falling the most, at 3%.
Why challenge the ruling?
It seems a little odd that the airlines would oppose the rule, especially since the rest of the industry decided not to join these three, and because the rules allow for passengers to see what portion of a ticket's price comes from paying government taxes.
I'll take the three on one by one, as each airline has a cost structure somewhat different than traditional airlines. In Southwest's case, the complaint was based both on principle and logistics. Arguing that grocery stores could sell products for prices not including the taxes, it wondered why airlines should be any different. Furthermore, the company said that the cost for making changes to company websites and rewards programs would be steep.
Allegiant and Spirit, on the other hand, have made a living off lower-than-reality cost advertising. In fact, even after the Airfare Advertising Rules went into effect, Allegiant was fined $100,000 -- in part, for brazenly advertising that passengers could "Fly Free" to Las Vegas or Tampa Bay.
And Spirit, which I've made no secret about disliking, took things to an even weirder level. Personally, I think it's bad enough that passengers are charged for everything from printing a boarding pass, to carry-on luggage (as much as $45), and have to try to decipher it all on the company's confusing fares page; but according to SmartTravel.com, Spirit went so far as to create a webpage to show its displeasure.
Though I was unable to find an active link, Spirit advertised keepmyfareslow.org on its homepage in 2012. As SmartTravel noted back then:
The word "WARNING" is posted in bold capital letters that flash red, driving home a melodramatic point. Spirit invites flyers to contact their representatives to "help stop this injustice," adding, "If the government can hide taxes in your airfares, then they can carry out their hidden agenda and quietly increase their taxes."
Maybe I could take Spirit's message a little more seriously if the company wasn't so reliant on difficult-to-understand fees for so much of its revenue already. Talk about the pot calling the kettle black!
Either way, with the Supreme Court's decision, all airlines will have to post ticket prices in a uniform way now.
Look at the big picture
One of the reasons airlines have been such notoriously bad investments is because they are so reliant on copious amounts of gasoline to get passengers from one place to another. Instead of investing in airlines, why not focus on energy?
The Motley Fool's analysts have uncovered an under-the-radar energy company that's dominating its industry. This company currently accounts for about 7.5% of my real-life holdings. To get the name and detailed analysis of this company that will prosper for years to come, check out the special free report: "The Only Energy Stock You'll Ever Need." Don't miss out on this limited-time offer and your opportunity to discover this under-the-radar company before the market does. Click here to access your report -- it's totally free.
The article Supreme Court: Sorry, Airlines, You Have to Tell the Whole Story originally appeared on Fool.com.Fool contributor Brian Stoffel has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends Southwest Airlines. The Motley Fool owns shares of Spirit Airlines. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Copyright © 1995 - 2013 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.