The patent cliff has been dealing a slow but painful blow to big pharma over the last several years. It will hit especially hard for Merck this year as it loses major protection for its former mega-blockbuster Singulair in markets across the globe. That raises the stakes for the company's current product lineup and pending pipeline.
The type 2 diabetes franchise Januvia/Janumet will take over the top spot for Merck in 2013, but growth from those therapies alone won't be enough to make up for Singulair's fall. What other top drugs do investors need to watch? Isentress, a first-in-class HIV drug, and Gardasil, the leading HPV vaccine on the market, are two good places to start. However, they may be headed in opposite directions.
Does Isentress have a shot in HIV?
Let's be honest here. Gilead Sciences is the unquestioned leader in HIV and AIDS therapies, which is backed up by its $8 billion in segment sales last year. The company's Atripla and Truvada brought in $3.5 billion and $3.2 billion, respectively, in 2012 and are the top two drugs on the market.
The news gets worse for competitors such as Merck. Gilead had Stribild, a four-in-one pill, approved in late August. Sales for the new drug tallied $57.5 million in its first four months on the market, and some analysts think that figure will eventually reach $4.7 billion annually. While sales from Stribild will offset generic competition for its top therapies beginning in 2018, it also offers one huge advantage: convenience. That's a big, big deal for patients.
Whereas Merck's Isentress requires two pills daily, Stribild requires patients to take only one, albeit twice the size. A study evaluating once-daily use of Isentress failed to prove the regimen as effective as the standard twice-daily dosage, effectively dousing hopes for expanded use. Failure aside, the drug is the third best-selling HIV drug behind Gilead's relentless attack.
The verdict: Since 2010, Isentress has grown sales nearly 50% to $1.5 billion, which represents the peak sales originally expected when the drug launched. The drug hit the mark earlier than expected, so there may be more room to run, but it will never reach the swagger of Gilead's top products. Unfortunately for investors, the drug's best years are likely behind it.
Does anyone know how to gauge this market?
The market for HPV consists of just two therapies: Gardasil from Merck and Cervarix from GlaxoSmithKline . Although it was once hailed as a major competitor to Gardasil, Cervarix netted just $350.54 million in sales in 2012. That is well below Gardasil's $1.63 billion last year and down markedly from $657 million in 2011. How were early expectations for a neck-and-neck race so off?
Several reasons. First, Gardasil has been shown to protect (primarily) against HPV types 6, 11, 16, and 18 whereas its competitor protects against only the latter two. The difference is in disease progression. For instance, HPV types 6 and 11 lead to 90% of genital warts cases, and types 16 and 18 lead to 70% of cervical cancers. The broader ring of protection has made Merck's therapy an easy choice for doctors.
Second, few industry analysts gave either vaccine much of chance in the wake of a growing consumer disdain for vaccines. Despite an avalanche of data showing absolutely no connection between common vaccines and autism or mental retardation, more and more parents are choosing to forgo inoculating their children. Presidential hopeful Michele Bachmann fueled the dangerous misconceptions further in 2011 as she attacked Rick Perry for mandating HPV vaccinations in Texas. Somehow, Gardasil escaped election season unscathed on route to its best year ever.
Gardasil was feared to have peaked at $1.5 billion in sales in 2007 after tumbling down to just over $1 billion in 2010. Merck surprised nearly everyone last year by announcing 2012 sales of $1.63 billion worth of its life-saving vaccine. The reawakening demonstrates that fear and politics can be tough variables to account for in the complex pharmaceutical industry.
The verdict: I would be wary of following analyst forecasts for either Gardasil or Cervarix in the future, although the former does appear to be back on track for tremendous growth. The therapy's broad coverage is a significant advantage to its only competitor. In fact, the United Kingdom announced that it was switching from Cervarix to Gardasil at the end of 2011 for just that reason.
Can Merck beat the patent cliff?
So, it looks as if Isentress is flat-lining while Gardasil still has plenty of room to run. Investors will need to continue to keep an eye on new developments in the market and in Merck's pipeline, as the company has stumbled into 2013 and continues to battle patent expirations and pipeline problems. Is Merck still a solid dividend play, or should investors be looking elsewhere? In a new premium research report on Merck, The Fool tackles all of the company's moving parts, its major market opportunities, and reasons to both buy and sell. To find out more click here to claim your copy today.
The article These Blockbusters Have Different Futures for Merck originally appeared on Fool.com.
Fool contributor Maxx Chatsko has no position in any stocks mentioned. Check out his personal portfolio, his CAPS page, or follow him on Twitter @BlacknGoldFool to keep up with his writing on energy, bioprocessing, and emerging technologies.The Motley Fool recommends Gilead Sciences. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Copyright © 1995 - 2013 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.