Whether you're in a personal relationship or a business relationship, no one likes mixed signals. But that's exactly what Citigroup is sending to its investors regarding plans for handling cash reserves set aside for the bank's troubled mortgages.
Bad banks for bad mortgages
Reuters is reporting that John Gerspach, Citigroup's Chief Financial Officer, told investors at a conference this past Tuesday that the bank would begin releasing these reserve funds "sooner rather than later." The bad mortgages, a leftover from the financial crisis, were spun off from Citigroup into another entity called Citi Holdings, which lost $3.7 billion last year.
But not even one month ago, Gerspach told investors on the bank's fourth-quarter earnings call that Citigroup was hesitant to release these reserves until the country had more completely resolved the fiscal cliff -- that the way it had been settled was a case of "kicking the can down the road."
If you build it, they will come
But since nothing has changed from a political perspective regarding the fiscal cliff in the past month, why the sudden change of heart regarding Citigroup's cash reserves? Has something else of significance changed? Or is Gerspach just trying to make investors hopeful and happy, with no reality-based reason for doing so?
Gerspach did hint that perhaps by settling ongoing claims with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, Citi Holdings might be able to break even sooner rather than later, but he gave no specific indication how or whether this might happen. Bank of America made a $10 billion-plus settlement with Fannie Mae just last month, and many of that bank's investors are hopeful that this might exorcise the last crisis-related demons B of A has to deal with.
So maybe Citigroup has some similar deal in the works, and this is a roundabout way of leaking that info to investors. The bank's stock did finish the day 2.78% higher yesterday, so if boosting investor confidence and share price was the plan behind Gerspach's comments, it worked.
But speaking as someone who has yet to put any money into B of A, because I don't believe the bank has exorcised the last of its crisis-related demons, I have to say that Gerspach's comments don't fill me with the sort of confidence I need to dial up my broker and tell him to buy Citi. In fact, these mixed signals the bank is sending make me even more wary of this obviously still-troubled bank.
Straighten out Citigroup's books once and for all, Mr. Gerspach, and the investment dollars will follow. That's about as simple and straightforward a message as I can send.
But don't let this Fool have the last word when it comes to Citigroup. In our new premium report, Matt Koppenheffer, The Motley Fool's senior baking analyst, will fill you in on both reasons to buy and reasons to sell Citigroup, and what areas that the bank's investors need to watch going forward. For instant access to Andy's personal take on Citi, simply click here now.
The article Why Citigroup Is Making Me Nervous originally appeared on Fool.com.
Fool contributor John Grgurich has no positions in any of the stocks mentioned. Follow John's dispatches from the bleeding heart of capitalism on Twitter @TMFGrgurich. The Motley Fool owns shares of Bank of America and Citigroup. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.