We may not be better off than we were five years ago, but the investors don't seem to care as the market continues to march higher. For skeptics like me, that's an opportunity to see whether companies have earned their current valuations.
Keep in mind that some companies deserve their current valuations. ARM Holdings , for example, appears well-deserving of a new 52-week high after posting a 19% increase in sales and a 28% increase in year-over-year profits for the fourth-quarter. Furthermore, ARM's first-quarter forecast was ahead of Wall Street's expectations and management also proposed a 35% dividend increase. Game-set-match, ARM!
Still, other companies might deserve a kick in the pants. Here's a look at three companies that could be worth selling.
I freely admit there are a few retailers I've never come around to -- Pier 1 Imports is one of those retailers. Pier 1 has been a big beneficiary from the recent surge in new home sales as new homeowners are turning to the discount store for good deals on home furnishings and accessories. However, I have my own reasons to believe that investors may be getting way ahead of themselves here.
To start with, the housing rebound is really only a few months old, so to assume that it can continue at such a rapid pace with the payroll tax taking around $1,000 out of the average taxpayer's pockets per year is a foolish assumption. Second, same-store sales growth of 8.2% in December, while definitely commendable, is going to be extremely difficult to duplicate or beat next year. There are fewer great deals to be had in the housing market and disposable incomes are shrinking because of higher taxes for many Americans. Finally, Pier 1 is valued at a lofty 22 times cash flow, a level it hasn't seen regularly since 2005, the same year its stock began its multi-year descent from $20 to just $0.11 a few years later.
Unlike in 2009, I'd definitely say the worst is behind Pier 1, but I have a hard time recommending it as a buy anywhere above $15 with so many uncertainties still evident.
Cue the little elephants
I'll give office supply chain OfficeMax credit for some very entertaining commercials depicting small rhinos and elephants, but that won't be enough to distract me from the fact that it's a poor choice for an investment.
OfficeMax has doubled since it announced the extinguishment of $871.5 million in non-recourse debt related to notes backed by Lehman Brothers, which became null and void when Lehman went bankrupt. The result was a far less indebted OfficeMax that glimmered with a one-time profit on its books. But, I'd advise those who've been lucky enough to enjoy the ride to come down from the perch quickly. OfficeMax's sales are projected to contract 2% this year and be flat next year as it closes underperforming stores and attempts to realign its focus toward traffic-driving mobile devices.
The problem with this plan is that Staples , my clear favorite in the office supply sector, beat OfficeMax to the punch by a good year. Staples made plans to reduce its square footage and focus on mobile long before OfficeMax, giving it a better chance at capturing traffic in a highly competitive market. Staples also offers investors much better overall value at just 9.5 times forward earnings and with a yield of 3.3%. OfficeMax shareholders will pay more than 13 times forward earnings for essentially flat growth with a yield of just 0.7%. Thanks, but no thanks, OfficeMax -- you can keep your mini elephants!
Where's the beef?
My kudos and congratulations to staffing company Kforce for trouncing Wall Street's expectations in the fourth-quarter, but where's the beef behind these numbers?
For the quarter, Kforce reported $269.8 million in revenue and a profit of $0.24. Expectations had only called for the company to earn $0.22 on $267.6 million in revenue. However, revenue fell by 5.5% year-over-year and adjusted GAAP earnings sank by 15% -- hardly a reason for the share price to explode higher by double-digits as my Foolish colleague Travis Hoium so astutely pointed out. Even Kforce's first-quarter forecast of $268 million to $274 million in revenue and a profit of $0.09-$0.12 failed to meet the current consensus of $275.5 million in revenue and $0.14 in EPS.
Staffing companies have been basically battening down the hatches and utilizing share repurchases and cost-cutting tools to artificially boost EPS, and Kforce is no different. On one hand, it is doing what it can to enhance shareholder value through buybacks and a special dividend, but all it's really doing is masking the fact that enterprises aren't hiring much, if at all, and that's bad news for staffing companies like Kforce with shrinking prospects. The risks simply outweigh the rewards with this company.
This week it's all about innovation and differentiation -- something I'm inferring none of these three companies possess. Pier 1's close ties to the housing sector and economy, as well as OfficeMax and Kforce's lack of sales growth, make these three stocks portfolio liabilities with far too much risk for my own taste.
Let our top analysts introduce you to the true kings of the retail world
The retail space is in the midst of the biggest paradigm shift since mail order took off at the turn of last century. Only those most forward-looking and capable companies will survive, and they'll handsomely reward those investors who understand the landscape. You can read about the 3 Companies Ready to Rule Retail in our special report. Uncovering these top picks is free today; just click here to read more.
The article 3 Stocks Near 52-Week Highs Worth Selling originally appeared on Fool.com.
Fool contributor Sean Williams has no material interest in any companies mentioned in this article. You can follow him on CAPS under the screen name TMFUltraLong, track every pick he makes under the screen name TrackUltraLong, and check him out on Twitter, where he goes by the handle @TMFUltraLong.The Motley Fool owns shares of Staples. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Copyright © 1995 - 2013 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.