One of the best aspects of earnings season is the opportunity to listen to conference calls hosted by companies you invest in. Doing so provides a rare glimpse into the temperament of the executives in charge and provides color to the otherwise monochromatic figures presented in a typical earnings release.
Over the last few days, two of the nation's best banks, Wells Fargo and US Bancorp , hosted their quarterly earnings calls. And while I've already covered the overarching details of their performances -- click here for an analysis of Wells Fargo's earnings and here for US Bancorp's -- I wanted to share one critical point that was stressed by the executives of both banks.
The importance of noninterest income
For many of you, saying that noninterest income is important is too obvious to warrant mention. Yet there's both a growing chorus of discontent outside the industry over overdraft fees and checking account fees, and a school of thought within banking itself that belittles their significance.
Over the last few years, a series of lawsuits and regulations have greatly restricted banks' abilities to charge for certain practices. In 2010, for example, Congress passed the Durbin Amendment to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, which caps interchange fees that lenders collect when debit card payments are processed. And at the end of 2011, Bank of Americaadded its name to a growing list of lenders that have settled legal actions brought over the way in which overdraft fees on checking accounts had been assessed.
It's not just those outside the industry who have minimized the importance of fees. Take Hudson City Bancorp as an example. Its business model was predicated on being fee-free. In the third quarter of last year, the New Jersey-based lender recorded $203 million in net interest income but only $3 million in noninterest income. As an important bookend to this story, Hudson City appears to have been effectively forced by regulators into selling itself to M&T Bank , a upstate New York-based regional lender that most assuredly doesn't ascribe to the same model. The reason? Hudson City couldn't make enough money to offset its souring mortgage portfolio.
The reality is, fees matter. And they matter for at least one reason: They serve as a hedge against declining interest rates. One of the main concerns of any bank investor is that banks' net interest incomes are a function of interest rates in the broader economy -- something individual institutions have absolutely no control over. As long-term rates go down, customers refinance at lower rates, and the bank's net interest margin (NIM), and thus profitability, decline as well.
We've seen this with increasing regularity these days on the heels of the Federal Reserve's third round of quantitative easing. The storyline for bank earnings these last two quarters has been all about falling NIMs. After Wells Fargo reported a 25-basis-point decline in its NIM for the third quarter of last year, investors sent its shares to the pillory. The same has been true for fourth quarter earnings, as both M&T and Wells Fargo reported outstanding fourth-quarter results but nevertheless saw their share prices decline -- click here to see my take on M&T's fourth-quarter earnings.
This, in turn, is the crux of my point -- that is, despite falling NIMs, both of these lenders reported record earnings. How could this be so? The answer, to get back to the reason fees matter, is because noninterest income effectively served as a hedge. As borrowers refinanced into lower yielding loans, the fees they paid to do so offset the deficit. There's revenue either way, in other words. The only difference is where it shows up on the income statement -- up top, as net interest income, or down below, as noninterest income.
With this in mind, one of the things you should always look for in a bank is if its revenue sources are evenly distributed between those that are positively affected by declining interest rates and those that are not. Wells Fargo fits this category, as does US Bancorp, as does New York Community Bank , which charges prepayment penalties to hedge its portfolio of multifamily mortgages. Indeed, this is one of the main reasons I'm such a huge fan of the latter, as it's effectively entrenched its operations from attacks from all directions.
Bank fees get a bad rap
At the end of the day, saying that bank fees are a good thing won't win you any friends. However, if you invest in banks, it's critical to understand their central importance to a bank's business model. Indeed, I would go so far as to say that you should never invest in a bank that doesn't generate roughly half of its revenue from noninterest dependent sources. That's a lesson you can take to the bank.
To see how fees effectively protect New York Community Bank against interest rate risk, download our new in-depth report on the lender by clicking here now.
The article 1 Critical Lesson from Wells Fargo and US Bancorp's Earnings originally appeared on Fool.com.
John Maxfield owns shares of Bank of America. The Motley Fool recommends Wells Fargo. The Motley Fool owns shares of Bank of America and Wells Fargo. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Copyright © 1995 - 2013 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.